Because the basis you are suggesting I kill them is that they cant change that about themselves
Black Preacher destroys the "Gay is the New Black" argument
- Thread starter blackslash
- Start date
Its not double speak and that free speech analogy doesnt work because
Marriage is a defined that concept and homosexual individuals can marry
Again
Homosexual individuals can marry
What they want is to redefine it but thats not a civil issue
Cuz homosexuals were never prevented from getting married they just dnt like what marriage is
You didn't answer the question.
What should we do with gays in society?
They're gay. They're not going to change. What do you do?
Whether or not they're born that way.
What
Do
You
Do?
If you're not in favor of killing them, then shut the fukk up.
I don't see whats wrong with expanding marriage to gays.
You're being intellectually dishonest
The laws for "voting" used to be restricted as well. Let me see you dodge on that one.
Im not in favor of killing alot of people that do wrong so I dnt see the logic here
Jus cuz I dnt wanna kill em means I cant debate this topic??
did i ever say that? No
they are human beings
suffering from a pathology
that we are all responsible for
our lust for sex and violence
has created a hybrid of sorts
but the human race will eventually
kill itself off maybee humanity
wants to kill itself off....
and the "winter soldier"
or "assassin" if you will ...
will be Homosexuality...
because homosexuals can not advance
our species.....
soon it will be...
NITE NITE
But "voting" within its standalone definition is not a restrictive term
So what do you do with gay people?Im not in favor of killing alot of people that do wrong so I dnt see the logic here
Jus cuz I dnt wanna kill em means I cant debate this topic??
And why do you just stop at giving gay monogamous couples legal benefits?
They're ALREADY gay.
NOW thats the case. Until 1960s, that was not so.
White men couldn't even vote without owning land.
You're not answering anything.
Gays...are ALREADY gay.
You can't fukking just pretend that them getting married changes anything.
Why are u so insistent on excluding the possibility of reformation in your questions
nikka, speak english and stop running your responses through a thesaurusWhy are u so insistent on excluding the possibility of reformation in your questions
wtf are you even saying
No u didnt get my answer..NOW thats the case. Until 1960s, that was not so.
White men couldn't even vote without owning land.
Im saying that "voting", without the outside terms of surrounding contexts is not a restrictive term
Those laws werent laws based on the definition of voting but rather who they chose to prescribe the right to vote to
And as I said this is not the same case as what we're discussing here
The Gay agenda has you working overtime today homie...hope you gettin paid time and a half...what they pay you to get on the coli and fight their agenda?
$10.10 an hour?
I amnikka, speak english and stop running your responses through a thesaurus
wtf are you even saying
Im saying your questions are excluding the possibility that people can stop being "gay"