Black Preacher destroys the "Gay is the New Black" argument
- Thread starter blackslash
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,840
- Daps
- 152,086
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
What are you, an economist? Consenting adults should be able to do whatever the fukk they want behind closed doors. Furthermore, how does gay marriage make economic sense? If more homosexual unions occur, childbirth rates will definitely fall. This will also negatively affect the economy If overall population numbers fall. So, therefore we are in agreement that gay marriage is bad for society due to its potential negative economic impact it would have on society in the long run?
This already makes no sense.
heterosexuals don't stop fukking whether or not they get married, nor do kids stop being made if people don't get married.
That makes NO sense.
They're ALREADY gay.
and as history can easily show, if we prevent gay marriage, gays will have no choice but to go have straight lives and have children?
I'm done:zfg:
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,840
- Daps
- 152,086
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
You've said that thousands of time. So using this logic pedophiles also wont stop being pedophiles despite the illegality of it. We should therefore legalize pedophilia no?
People in polygamous relationships likely enjoy being in such relationships, despite your liberal musings. Should we therefore legalize polygamy?
Your circular arguments don't really answer the real questions here breh.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,840
- Daps
- 152,086
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
Bye
and as history can easily show, if we prevent gay marriage, gays will have no choice but to go have straight lives and have children?
I'm done:zfg:
Doesn't matter.
Societies make the rules societies want to rule themselves by. Youths are not able to make accurate decisions about being able to engage in sex and therefore should not be legally allowed to...nor do i want to allow that.
I thnk gays should be allowed to get married in monogamous relationships.
They don't become LESS gay by not getting married. In the same way heterosexuals don't become LESS heterosexual by not being allowed to get married.
POLYGAMY is not the same as POLYAMORY
Polygamy is the institution, polyamory is the act.
If theres gay or straight polygamy theres fewer gay or straight mates to find.
thats what happens. Everyone loses in that end.
I'm just waiting until you start pulling out the bible to start justifying shyt like you always do. Its coming...
i dont really understand this shyt.
i don't give a fukk, long as it is between consenting adults
dudes stay making the dumbest arguments on this...it never fails.
1. all gays aren't pedophiles (notice they're never compared to necrophiles or something silly)
2. gay people don't STOP being gay if they can't get married. Its not like marriage is some magic fukking event
3. gay marriage LITERALLY changes nothing for straight people. LITERALLY nothing.
http://www.advocate.com/news/2008/11/16/gay-new-black?page=full
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/monique-ruffin/gay-civil-rights_b_1168897.html
From a male perspective it is a sanitary issue. For one it causes health problems. You shouldn't need to perform self enemas to have sex, but they do. It can lead to hospitalizations that requires surgery of the colon prolapse, ileus, torn rectums that can lead to hemorrhage. Also it can lead to the transfer of bacteria because you are dealing with an area designed to excrete waste....such as MRSA, VRE and of course AIDS.
From a female perspective I just don't quite understand what they are doing. The woman still needs penetration in order to feel sexually satisfied (whether its a finger or a penis) so she might as well have a man. There is a mental issue there that they are dealing with. The oral sex they perform on each other shouldn't cause any health issues.
Im not in favor of killing alot of people that do wrong so I dnt see the logic here
Jus cuz I dnt wanna kill em means I cant debate this topic??
@Napoleon is outright insane. The guy is really on here just jumping all the way to killing innocent people because you disagree with their lifestyle choice.
Another problem that Gay Marriage has is that we already see the power and wealth that these folks have. This will cause more economic problems once the two partners can combine their wealth and get tax breaks etc. You will see plenty of fraud and abuse once men start marrying other men simply to get tax breaks etc. Since there is no way to prove that you are gay...they can simply proclaim gayness, marry, and then proceed to exploit government loopholes for bigger tax breaks. They can simply live their real hetero sexual lifestyle behind the scenes. I haven't even touched on the abuse of 'spousal privilege' in criminal cases once dudes start corporate/criminal organizations.
It will literally undermine the fabric of our society.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,840
- Daps
- 152,086
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
Stop explaining shyt no one asked you to. I'm very clear on the difference between polyamory and polygamy. What I'm waiting for you to do is to explain why your against polygamy, despite it fitting all the liberal arguments you're using to defend homosexuality. You can't be on staunch support of a certain form of sexual deviancy but present vague bullshyt arguments as to why you're against another. Capitalizing words and demanding people explain why they don't want to kill gays because their against the redefinition of marriage isn't a suitable argument Breh.
Perhap you should pose the question to your liberal overlords at the Huffington Post and ask them, since you seem to not have the answers Breh
Poppa_Dock
:gladlebron:
napoleon why are you so threatened by polygamy?
The elephant in the room these days is the fact that once you start judging things in terms of "consenting adults" and "as long as nobody is hurt" you open the floodgates for a a bunch of things that progressively start chipping away at shyt people once found disturbing, and then you can't go back because you have opened the gates.
The same for discrimination, if you going to be all we all the world then you have to respect the anti gay person you can't be wanting dudes fired because they hate gays the same way you can't fire a gay person because he is gay, but just like stupid human being usually do, people really just want the tables turned, it's not really about non discrimination or accepting peoples lifestyles, it's still about putting your lifestyle or the group you belong to above others and it always will be that way.
The elephant in the room these days is the fact that once you start judging things in terms of "consenting adults" and "as long as nobody is hurt" you open the floodgates for a a bunch of things that progressively start chipping away at shyt people once found disturbing, and then you can't go back because you have opened the gates.
The same for discrimination, if you going to be all we all the world then you have to respect the anti gay person
you can't be wanting dudes fired because they hate gays the same way you can't fire a gay person because he is gay, but just like stupid human being usually do, people really just want the tables turned, it's not really about non discrimination or accepting peoples lifestyles, it's still about putting your lifestyle or the group you belong to above others and it always will be that way.1. I don't describe it as sexual deviancy. Merely that inheritance, property claims, and tax benefits get complicated when more parties are involved. Have as many partners as you want, but not legally more than one. It creates a skewed distribution towards inequality and zaps up viable mates for others.
2. I can definitely be for one thing and against another.
napoleon why are you so threatened by polygamy?
The elephant in the room these days is the fact that once you start judging things in terms of "consenting adults" and "as long as nobody is hurt" you open the floodgates for a a bunch of things that progressively start chipping away at shyt people once found disturbing, and then you can't go back because you have opened the gates.
The same for discrimination, if you going to be all we all the world then you have to respect the anti gay person
Because monogamy and polygamy are different arguments.
I fail to see what you can't stay on one topic at a time.
Poppa_Dock
:gladlebron:
i fail to see how your argument makes sense. You are bringing up a fantasy that a bunch of shyt will go out of wack with taxes, property claims etc. because somebody would have multiple wives/husbands. The main point is that you fail to see how you are a hypocrite for talking all this consenting adult shyt and anybody should be able to do what they want but yet you would be against polygamy, that doesn't make sense. The shyt you are bringing up is in the same realm as somebody saying if gay marriage is allowed then dudes will be swinging dildos in churches. What if 3 gay guys wanted to marry eachother?
