well when u get that ontological proof holla at me
Black Preacher destroys the "Gay is the New Black" argument
- Thread starter blackslash
- Start date
nikka..they arent prevented from getting married..as that legal document laid out..its not that they cant get married, rather..they want to redefine what marriage means, which makes it not a civil rights issue
I'm saying.
If they just cut the bullshyt and said "I hate fakkit queers who suck dikk and fukk each other in the ass because it makes me feel weird about myself" i'd feel A LOT better.
But no.............we gotta play wack-a-mole with the selective bible reading, misreading of court cases, and armchair level philosophy about how legal systems work in favor of minorities.
do you have any idea what ontological means?well when u get that ontological proof holla at me
OK. And? Let them redefine it! It doesn't fukking matter!
And for the record, I don't support legal polygamy. Polyamory, do you. Polygamy? No.
What if they feel its inherently wrong
You know...like any other thing that isnt really inherently wrong in the constructs of ur worldview
What if they feel its inherently wrong
You know...like any other thing that isnt really inherently wrong in the constructs of ur worldview
This doesn't make any sense.
I don't LIKE the idea of dudes fukking cause it doesn't appeal to me, in the same manner i don't like fat people wasting social services...but I see NO NEED to limit their ability to enter legal unions defined as marriage.
But that no longer makes it a civil rights issue...do u not get it???
Gays could always get married dude..they were never prevented from getting married....the problem is they are saying they have been prevented from getting married but no they never were...so its not a civil rights issue
Within the constructs of nihilism no reason is sufficient to condemn any action
inherently
Yes
It
Is.
Before gay marriage, gays couldn't even BE GAY you fukking dolt.
GAYS COULD NOT GET MARRIED...unless they married people of the OTHER sex.
dawg there are politicians TRYING TO ACTIVELY remove the ability of gays to get married...and you're sitting here saying this dumb shyt.
nikka, keep up already.
This is proof you're losing the argument.Within the constructs of nihilism no reason is sufficient to condemn any action
inherently
I'm a goddamn existential-nihilist. Deal with it.
Now, if we can stay on topic.
What does this have to do with why you're so concerned with gays existing?
If you're against gay marriage, why aren't you in favor of killing gays?
Do all straight black males have to be against gay rights?homo riders are out in full force on this one
Yes
It
Is.
Before gay marriage, gays couldn't even BE GAY you fukking dolt.
GAYS COULD NOT GET MARRIED...unless they married people of the OTHER sex.
dawg there are politicians TRYING TO ACTIVELY remove the ability of gays to get married...and you're sitting here saying this dumb shyt.
nikka, keep up already.
Exactly nikka
People who indentified themselves as homosexual could always get married...always..
You're not reading what Im saying..
"Gays" could always get married...but because marriage doesnt institute the type of union their looking for they cry "Civil rights issue"
No...gays could always marry...but the problem for them in that term's definiton is required the union of man and woman
Lemme reiterate what I am saying
A homosexual man could always get married in this country..
