Black men, this is what society looks like as a Black Matriarchy

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,679
Reputation
365
Daps
18,023
Reppin
Hell

Shorty K

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
3,480
Reputation
225
Daps
12,365
You're the one arguing with emotions and projecting that on everybody else.


Systemic means system.

In order to have systemic power, you have to have the power to change/direct/influence the system.

You can benefit from someone else's systemic power, but that doesn't mean you have the power yourself.

And again there is no favarable treatment in the courtroom based of gender. That's a myth that doesn't hold up to the actual laws or the results from those laws.

I added the piece about nobody attacking black women by acknowledging that we have been systemically turned into a matriarchy because I think that's the root of your feelings on this topic. You're yacking mostly nonsense because you feel as if I'm trying to denigrate black women by acknowledging the reality of black women being given more systemic control over the household than black men. Even women admit and understand that the court SYSTEM shows a bias towards them on the basis of their gender over black men. Stop denying reality to irrationally defend black women from a perceived attack. It's one of the biggest problems we have in our community, feelings are more important than facts. A bi product of being overly matriarchal.
 

Larry Lambo

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
8,814
Reputation
1,700
Daps
30,663
Are u fukking serious:hhh:


What do you think the job prospects were during the civil rights era

Brah go kill yaself

U must be white:hhh:


Nope, what I was getting at is that it's deeper than just kicking the father out of the house. It's having a system that forced people to depend on assistance instead of providing the educational/job/business opportunities needed for self sufficiency.

I think we all can agree that a man shouldn't be depending on public assistance to provide for his family. That's the bigger issue. But yes having said that, if we are at the point where that is necessary, then kicking him out of the house only makes things worse and ripe for generational poverty.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,039
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,819
Reppin
Tha Land
Ironically the results from court proceedings that seemingly skew toward women are the direct result of this being a patriarchal nation.

All of you in here would say they women should be the main child rearers, and homemakers.

Then you want to cry foul when the court agrees and gives the woman the children and the home. :mjlol:
 

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum,
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
79,977
Reputation
23,330
Daps
289,797
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
Nope, what I was getting at is that it's deeper than just kicking the father out of the house. It's having a system that forced people to depend on assistance instead of providing the educational/job/business opportunities needed for self sufficiency.

I think we all can agree that a man shouldn't be depending on public assistance to provide for his family. That's the bigger issue. But yes having said that, if we are at the point where that is necessary, then kicking him out of the house only makes things worse and ripe for generational poverty.
Nope, what I was getting at is that it's deeper than just kicking the father out of the house. It's having a system that forced people to depend on assistance instead of providing the educational/job/business opportunities needed for self sufficiency.

I think we all can agree that a man shouldn't be depending on public assistance to provide for his family. That's the bigger issue. But yes having said that, if we are at the point where that is necessary, then kicking him out of the house only makes things worse and ripe for generational poverty.
So basically u agreeing with me:dwillhuh:
 

Shorty K

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
3,480
Reputation
225
Daps
12,365
Ironically the results from court proceedings that seemingly skew toward women are the direct result of this being a patriarchal nation.

All of you in here would say they women should be the main child rearers, and homemakers.

Then you want to cry foul when the court agrees and gives the woman the children and the home. :mjlol:

At least you're not denying that black women have been given systemic control over the black household anymore.

Now let's get you to admit that systemic power over the household = matriarchy. Can you do that? Or do you feel like that is somehow me attacking women and will refuse on that basis?
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,039
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,819
Reppin
Tha Land
I added the piece about nobody attacking black women by acknowledging that we have been systemically turned into a matriarchy because I think that's the root of your feelings on this topic. You're yacking mostly nonsense because you feel as if I'm trying to denigrate black women by acknowledging the reality of black women being given more systemic control over the household than black men. Even women admit and understand that the court SYSTEM shows a bias towards them on the basis of their gender over black men. Stop denying reality to irrationally defend black women from a perceived attack. It's one of the biggest problems we have in our community, feelings are more important than facts. A bi product of being overly matriarchal.
And you keep repeating the same dumb ass shyt:smh:

Just cause you say something a whole bunch of times doesn't make it true.

Your facts are wrong.

Your understanding of what the terms you are using mean and what their implications are is off.

Your assumption about me are way off.

Literally nothing you've said these last couple posts has any merit.:francis:
 

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,679
Reputation
365
Daps
18,023
Reppin
Hell
The black community is neither a matriarchy nor patriarchy. It's two genders fighting for control of scraps. fukk all y'all, on tulips

That's a matriarch sir, man and women competing with each other, both having about the same net salary.

A patriarch mens MEN usually control the consumer spending that the WOMEN may tend to do, like the 60s when MEN had to APPROVE of their WIFES spending, stores called the husband to make sure he approved her purchase.

America became RICH off destroying the married black community, effects are still out there to this day.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,039
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,819
Reppin
Tha Land
At least you're not denying that black women have been given systemic control over the black household anymore.

Now let's get you to admit that systemic power over the household = matriarchy. Can you do that? Or do you feel like that is somehow me attacking women and will refuse on that basis?
That's not having systemic power over a household.

If two people are married and the agreement is that the woman will do most of raising the child and taking care of the home. That's viewed as patriarchy.

So when/if they divorce this same concept now turns into matriarchy??? How does that work in your mind??:dahell:
 

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,679
Reputation
365
Daps
18,023
Reppin
Hell
the stats show gender bias in criminal and custody court though.

Which would make plenty of sense as it adds to consumer spending. Hair weaves and beauty products are on the rise.

Black Buying Power To Reach $1.3 Trillion By 2017

It's really a bad argument for anyone to really blame black issues on black men, typically no matter how VIOLENT they make us, we're relatively harmless in the long term goal of things.

Men tend to be more conservative
men tend to vote more conservative

Alot of what we do we do solely for the affection of women, let's keep in real. nikkas buying 300 dollar shoes, not for they boys, but females...
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
Stats without context mean nothing.

Majority of marriages the woman is the one that deals with the child most. It would make sense that, that will continue into divorce.
so personal experience and our own eyes means nothing, and now, stats means nothing as well. so what matters?

lets try this another way. both genders commits the exact same crime, who is getting the harsher sentence on average?

and lets say both genders earn the same and spends the same amount of time with the kids, who is gaining custody on average?
 

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,679
Reputation
365
Daps
18,023
Reppin
Hell
That's not having systemic power over a household.

If two people are married and the agreement is that the woman will do most of raising the child and taking care of the home. That's viewed as patriarchy.

So when/if they divorce this same concept now turns into matriarchy??? How does that work in your mind??:dahell:

No it's not Patriarchy is more about finances... it ain't about kids that much. you can be in a patriarchy with no kids....

Europeans speak in terms of POWER, it all comes down to the money.


A patriarchy (from Greek: patria means family; archy means rule) is a family, government, or society controlled by senior men, especially by family patriarchs, i.e., male heads of extended families. For example, under patriarchy, if a man whose father (and whose father's father, etc.) has died, has two married sons and two married daughters and 15 grandchildren, then any money earned by either of his two sons belongs, not to the individual who earns the money, but to the family, and the patriarch of the family has authority to decide how the money is to be distributed among the family members. He has no similar authority over his married daughters, who are under the authority of the patriarchs of the families into which they have married.

The term is often used to mean societal control by men in general, although this is more properly termed andrarchy[?]. Many construe this to mean a gender hierarchy in which men dominate or exploit women, but that need not be the case.

Some feminist writers have considered patriarchy to be the basis on which most modern societies have been formed. They argue that it is necessary and desirable to get away from this model in order to achieve equality of the sexes. Some critics argue that these writers are oversimplifying the complexities of society, and/or that such gender roles are not necessarily harmful.

Patriarchy is distinct from patrilineality and patrilocality.
 
Top