Black man kicked off plane because he was allegric to a passenger's dog, sues airline

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

The fact they removed the paying first class human passenger to allow a dog makes me

 

[Deuterion]

Im not with the support animal shyt but it seems like he was offered seats in multiple parts of the plane afterward, including 1st class.

Bruh seems like he was just fishing to sue someone

...or how about move the fukking dog and its companion to fukking Main Cabin 5 or Basic Economy? There ain't shyt in First Class for a damn dog...unlimited bowls of Kibbles and Bits? Fiji Water straight from aquifer to dish? Nope.

 

[FluffyCorleone]

I don't get it:

"The crew offered to move the customer with the support animal to another seat in the first class cabin so Mr. Holcomb could remain in his seat. Mr. Holcomb wasn’t satisfied with that solution, so he was given the option of a seat further away from the service animal in the main cabin with a refund in the difference in fare, which he also declined," the airline said in a statement.

Re-seating the passenger with the support dog is the logical solution. Why wasn't he (Mr. Holcomb) satisfied with that? Then they offered to re-seat him and he declined that. Seems like they've made efforts to accommodate him but he was going to pursue a lawsuit regardless.

 

[Rekkapryde]

I don't get it:

"The crew offered to move the customer with the support animal to another seat in the first class cabin so Mr. Holcomb could remain in his seat. Mr. Holcomb wasn’t satisfied with that solution, so he was given the option of a seat further away from the service animal in the main cabin with a refund in the difference in fare, which he also declined," the airline said in a statement.

Re-seating the passenger with the support dog is the logical solution. Why wasn't he (Mr. Holcomb) satisfied with that? Then they offered to re-seat him and he declined that. Seems like they've made efforts to accommodate him but he was going to pursue a lawsuit regardless.

Maybe....













































But fukk all dat, if the owner of the pet now moves next to someone else who has an allergy then what?

That's why these airlines are idiots for starting this bullshyt of allowing animals in the main cabin because of "support" for their owner. fukk all that shyt. Cacs always going too damn far with shyt. Put those animals with the luggage like we used to. fukk outta here with your support pet.

 

[GhostBreh]

I don't get it:

"The crew offered to move the customer with the support animal to another seat in the first class cabin so Mr. Holcomb could remain in his seat. Mr. Holcomb wasn’t satisfied with that solution, so he was given the option of a seat further away from the service animal in the main cabin with a refund in the difference in fare, which he also declined," the airline said in a statement.

Re-seating the passenger with the support dog is the logical solution. Why wasn't he (Mr. Holcomb) satisfied with that? Then they offered to re-seat him and he declined that. Seems like they've made efforts to accommodate him but he was going to pursue a lawsuit regardless.

"to another seat in the first class cabin". First class cabins are quite small so it probably wouldn't have made a difference anyway.

Why didn't they offer to move him to another class like they tried to with Mr. Holcomb is the real question.

Fukk cacs and their love for dogs over black people. Imagine paying for first class and then having to put up with panting, barking and allergies triggered by a filthy beast that has no business being there in the first place.