Embarassing shytNikkas still trying to claim Olmecs and Mayans, the white man somehow erased everyone's memory in both America and Africa and put different memories in
Embarassing shytNikkas still trying to claim Olmecs and Mayans, the white man somehow erased everyone's memory in both America and Africa and put different memories in
These ABOS people basically want us to believe in social media pimp and dope sales talk. A complete scam and swindle.Hum who are you again
"Most of have some Native American genetics"Although most of us have some Native American genetics, we're mostly west and central African and western European.
In the very early British colonial days there was a lot of mixing going on.
I said some...1-2% Native DNA."Most of have some Native American genetics"
That has been proven to be false and false again. Blacks on a whole in the Americas rarely have any native genetics.
I said some...1-2% Native DNA.
Our ancestors probably had more percentage. Keep in mind, those ancestry tests (23andme, ancestry.com) are only accurate within the last 5 generations.
How can your ancestry have had more admixture, when you are dealing with the same population?I said some...1-2% Native DNA.
Our ancestors probably had more percentage. Keep in mind, those ancestry tests (23andme, ancestry.com) are only accurate within the last 5 generations.
Your ancestors from Africa had more Native American DNA?
Tell me I’m dreaming. Neggas really don’t wanna be Black. That is dead ass depressing and sad al l at the same time
5 generations is your 2 times great grandparents (you count yourself as a generation). For me, that's roughly 1870s-80s when they were born. By the 1880s Black Americans were already admixed. We were already in this land for 300 years by that time.How can your ancestry have had more admixture, when you are dealing with the same population?
Do you understand a genetic bottleneck occurrence and the founder effect population?
Difference Between Bottleneck Effect and Founder Effect
A bottleneck effect is when there is a very noticeable reduction in population size for a minimum of one generation time. A founder effect is when a few individuals move to a new region andwww.differencebetween.net
population bottleneck
A population bottleneck is an event that drastically reduces the size of a populationwww.nature.com
5 generations is your 2 times great grandparents (you count yourself as a generation). For me, that's roughly 1870s-80s when they were born. By the 1880s Black Americans were already admixed. We were already in this land for 300 years by that time.
As I said before, in early British colonial America there was plenty of mixing going on. Black Americans in the 1880s most likely had higher than 1 or 2 percent Native American DNA. When the racial integrity act of 1924 was implemented many Native American communities wanted to separate themselves from black communities.
That's essentially what I'm saying. Most of us have a little Native ancestry. One of those links pointed out 1-3% and that makes sense.I guess you mean to say that individuals like Crispus Attucks had more native American Indian heritage at the time? And this became dispersed over time over the larger Black population. If so you end up with the percentage you’ve mentioned.
It couldn’t have been the average Black American had native American Indian admixture, because that would mean the average Black American should have by far more native American Indian admixture now.
People like Crispus Attucks are the genetic founder affect for this admixture.
“Crispus Attucks, a sailor of mixed African and Indigenous ancestry…”
Crispus Attucks (U.S. National Park Service)
www.nps.gov
“Unusually tall for the era at six feet, two inches, Attucks was of mixed ancestry, the son of an African American man and an American Indian woman.”
Crispus Attucks (1723-1770) •
Crispus Attucks, the first martyr of the Boston Massacre in 1770, was probably born near Framingham, Massachusetts, a Christianized and multitribal town of Indians, whites, and blacks, in 1723. Unusually tall for the era at six feet, two inches, Attucks was of mixed ancestry, the … Read...www.blackpast.org
“We analyzed the patterns of Native American admixture seen for the three largest genetic ancestry groups in the US population: African descendants,”
[…]
Native American ancestry in the modern African descendant population does not coincide with local geography, instead forming a single group with origins in the southeastern US, consistent with the Great Migration of the early 20thcentury.”
[…]
“The post-Colombian settling of North America brought African, European, and Native American populations into close proximity for the first time. The inevitable admixture among these groups resulted a reservoir of Native American ancestry in modern US populations, outside of traditional Native American groups. Here we characterize that Native American ancestry in a geographically diverse set of African descendant, […] “
Native American admixture recapitulates population-specific migration and settlement of the continental United States
Author summary The post-Colombian settling of North America brought African, European, and Native American populations into close proximity for the first time. The inevitable admixture among these groups resulted a reservoir of Native American ancestry in modern US populations, outside of...journals.plos.org
Americans across three genetic cohort studies. Image courtesy: Baharian et al. (2016)
The Great Migration and African-American Genomic History
Over 45 million African-Americans share a recent common history largely shaped by “The Great Migration” (1910-1970) from out of the Southern United States. And yet, the admixture history of the Afr…www.molecularecologist.com
A continuum of admixture in the Western Hemisphere revealed by the African Diaspora genome - Nature Communications
The Consortium on Asthma among African-ancestry Populations in the Americas (CAAPA) aims to better understand population genetics of the African diaspora. Here, it uses deeply sequenced whole-genomes to describe the impact of admixture and potential disease burden of deleterious variants.www.nature.com
400-600k Africans were brought over as slaves...or about 5% of the entire transatlantic slave trade. The vast majority went to the Caribbean and South America.Since that one thread with a coli breh who said there weren't enough slave ships to ship slaves over from Africa and there were millions of black people in America before Columbus arrived, I try to avoid these topics. I have more coherent discussions with dementia patients.
This is a very cool story though
400-600k Africans were brought over as slaves...or about 5% of the entire transatlantic slave trade. The vast majority went to the Caribbean and South America.
“It can be facts” it is facts and been facts even before being “verified”. There are plenty of other historical facts and things that exist that have not been completely verified by so called professionals yet for many reasons. Sometimes because no one else who was alive was there, other times those looking to verify don’t know where to look or white people lied/tried to hide it. Yet when a white person writes it in a book without your idea of verification it is still taken as fact was my point. Prime example is majority of the sources you are using to support your arguments with other folks in here don’t have sources/verification other than a white person wrote it.It can be facts, but it needs to be reviewed and verified on its authenticity. That has nothing to do with white. It has to do with being able to use proper methodology and peer review a source. The fact you commented like this is evident that you aren’t academically educated.
This story has been reviewed and verified and is authentic. Hence “Researchers linked song to Mende tribe in West Africa.”.
“It can be facts” it is facts and been facts even before being “verified”. There are plenty of other historical facts and things that exist that have not been completely verified by so called professionals yet for many reasons. Sometimes because no one else who was alive was there, other times those looking to verify don’t know where to look or white people lied/tried to hide it. Yet when a white person writes it in a book without your idea of verification it is still taken as fact was my point. Prime example is majority of the sources you are using to support your arguments with other folks in here don’t have sources/verification other than a white person wrote it.
The fact that you ASSume someone isn’t “academically educated” because you partially disagreed is extremely telling. Trying to insult others, feigning intelligence when it’s evident that you’re not as smart as you want to appear and you just want to argue with people online. It’s also giving you are white washed or non Black American ethnically and don’t know much about American/Black American history.
Have fun arguing with yourself now
This is the reason why I can’t fukk with clowns who try to say “we’re not African, we’re indigenous to this land.”
You’re disrespecting your ancestors who suffered through shyt like this so that your ungrateful ass can be here today.
You don’t wanna identify with Africa? Cool. But don’t disown your ancestors.
Nikkas still trying to claim Olmecs and Mayans, the white man somehow erased everyone's memory in both America and Africa and put different memories in