'Juelzing' doesn't accurately describe this....
This was so bad. Those women made themselves and Billy look even worse.
Lord have mercy
'Juelzing' doesn't accurately describe this....
yes i do@MMS do you study other traditions
This thread is helping me to understand how so many posters here get taken in by charlatans like Tariq.
Some of the same people in this thread who criticized the "vote blue, no matter who" mentality do the same thing with these supposedly pro-Black hotep hucksters. ("Support Black, even if they're wack.") (...Sorry.) These nikkas are no better than the usual IG thot; they're just selling you a different kind of hollow entertainment.
You can't just follow everyone who tells you what you want to hear, or whoever strokes your ego. Trust but verify.
So, Billy has an axe to grind against Christianity, calls it false, and criticizes it all based on hoaxes/misinformation/lies which he disseminates to his subscribers/adherents as 'Hidden Truth'.
When confronted with facts disproving everything he's said on the subject, he catches feelings and lashes out.
He probably posts on this forum.
Billy was caught not actually doing the research on what he says he’s an expert on..
The guy caught Billy on a couple things that have very little impact on Billy's message.
He def has an axe to grind against not only Christianity but all dogmatic, narcissistic, religions.
Its debatable if his information is anymore misinformation or lies than the religions he call himself debunking.
As the religions require quite a bit of "faith" to accept their evidence.
His information concerning his main message actually has more evidence than any abrahamic religion.
The guy caught Billy on a couple things that have very little impact on Billy's message. And christians celebrating like they won a super bowl ring.
Billy was caught not actually doing the research on what he says he’s an expert on.
I don’t even believe in the Bible and other religious texts personally, but I won’t accept somebody speaking like an expert when they haven’t done their research just because they have the same viewpoint as me.
This is not about Christianity or religion. This thread is just about a person traveling around speaking like they know what they are talking about, and then completely folding when their words are fact checked..
Again… this has nothing to do with Christianity. This could be about cooking recipes and a chef gets called out because he doesn’t even know the ingredients in the recipe.
And that's where he falls apart. Christianity isn't dogmatic or narcissistic while some Christians are. The guy who started it was killed and his message was 'You ain't better than the next man.'
No, it isn't debatable. The information has been freely available for centuries.
No one comes to McDonald's with a chemistry set so religion isn't the ONLY thing that requires quite a bit of faith.
No, it doesn't as his information is false and/or hoaxes which have NO evidence other than 'Trust me, bro'. '
Billy's 'message' was found to be false so why shouldn't they be celebrating his demise any more than that of a 'prosperity preacher' or pedophile priest?
Why are people defending a LIAR????
Surah An-Nisa - 1-176 - Quran.com
Read and listen to Surah An-Nisa. The Surah was revealed in Medina, ordered 4 in the Quran. The Surah title means "The Women" in English and consists ...quran.com
Genesis 16:7-13
2 Corinthians 5:5-8
Does it not say that "Satan will appear as an angel of light"? And that he would take all from Job (reconciled combatant) that he had?
In old religions, sorceresses claimed to have powers over light....
Calypso (mythology) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Calypso
"Sister Rain has left, and Father Sun is home. Brother Wind comes blowing in to welcome home the gnome." ― Calypso's song[source] Calypso Washington[1] is a secondary character that has appeared in multiple episodes of Bluey. Calypso is a Blue Merle Australian Shepherd[2] with dark brown, grey...blueypedia.fandom.com
How can someone make claims about death when they also cannot make life? If you can't complete the circle you should not make assumptions.
No he couldn’t. Whether or not Jesus was crucified was not the actual topic.I feel you but Jesus and Christianity is not Carsons advertised expertise. Hes never claimed to be a biblical scholar.
And then the main thing they think they buried him on about Jesus not being crucified, is debated amongst true scholars too. Everything concerning Christianity is debatable.
If Billy wasn't such a narcissist and was an actual debater, he could've crucified Wes...no pun intended.
It has to do with slaveryThe issue with Jesus being able to die stems from questions regarding his divinity
For those who believe Jesus to be a “good man” or “just a prophet” and nothing more, him dying in the cross as a historical event shouldn’t be an issue worth exploring because it doesn’t pose any problems to or contradict whatever they believe.
They just have a problem with CHRISTIANS believe.
Attacking the faith of someone whose religion has nothing to do with your beliefs is pointless to me….. unless one simply wants to suppress the truth, or defend a lie they are selling.
No he couldn’t. Whether or not Jesus was crucified was not the actual topic.
The topic was did Billy actually know full details of the texts he quotes.
He didn’t know the content or history of the texts he quotes to prove his point.
This is not about whether Jesus is crucified. It’s about whether or not the texts that Billy names actually support his statements and whether or not Billy even knows the history of the texts he quotes.