The War Report
NewNewYork
Maher peaked during the Bush years.
Me and homie were having a Diff discussion about america vs other countries.. but to bills “point”…Everyone has clearly missed the point so let’s just go with the question Bill asked….
How can you be the leaders of social activism (Hollywood) and completely ignore the impact that over the top violence has on children?
That's not what anyone has said.We still got people denying the large influence of media on the masses. What a world. I get it, we just want to be entertained. But to deny how constantly seeing death and violence desensitizes people to the real shyt is a damn shame.
So I can’t think multiple people need to do better at the same time? Why must I be so single minded?No, you aren't.
You made a thread deciding we need to blame Hollywood for our gun culture. to agree that Hollywood needs to do better when the real issue is our elected leaders need to do better and stop catering to the gun industry.
Even in this clip--can't believe I watched this racist, unfunny scumbag doing his faux intellectual Joe Rogan impersonation--he doesn't address the relationship between the gun industry and Hollywood.
He is also going back to the goofy bully narrative and claiming that it leads to gun violence when there is no evidence.
Like I said, neither Maher nor you are serious people about gun violence.
No one says otherwise.I mean people can't deny the influence media has on people when you can look at characters in movies ceasing to smoke cigs in movies and the generally decline in it's use the past couple of decades compared to the 50s & 60s.
How many of us have watched friends & family fall to bullshyt they see on social media...how many idiots are roaming around this country because they mainly watch fox news? and you want to deny how media can influence world views.
I used to absolve movies, games, and music too but much like what's in a person's environment, media can absolutely play a role in how they think and act. Doesn't mean there isn't personal responsibility for their actions, however media is VERY influential in our daily lives.
Because changing our laws addresses most of our gun violence. Saying, "do something with the movies," doesn't address the problem. Maher decided to say, "do something Hollywood!" Especially since he didn't talk about the gun industry's influence on Hollywood.So I can’t think multiple people need to do better at the same time? Why must I be so single minded?
I understand your point bro and i agree with you 100,So I can’t think multiple people need to do better at the same time? Why must I be so single minded?
I made the thread because I watched the show and when he said that, I said “Well he does have a point. I wonder what the coli thinks.”
Everyone is digging so deep into it. And yes I get it’s bill and he’s problematic and this is his job. But I know I wanted a mac 11 cause I saw it in new Jack city. I know I wanted the 50 cal after seeing dudes with it in movies. I know I wanted my .308 even though I never hunted. Cause movies. That’s why I want the .50 cal. That’s why I wanted the gun from Scarface. That’s why I carry the 9. And have so many guns.
It ain’t JUST cause the law allows. I don’t argue…Yes, banning all guns would drop shootings. And No, banning all gun movies wouldn’t stop them from happening.
But the LOVE of guns and everyone thinking they just need to be a badass with a gun, comes directly from entertainment like movies and music, and that is a PART of our gun culture
And why y’all talking bout the chart and “he made it seem”. It came from the FBI on data from mass shooters lol. He didnt make it up
Nah I don't take discussion as any type of disrespect. Sometimes I don't see the full picture so it's good to get other angles.I can't believe this thread went 100 posts deep. No disrespect to you @The Devil's Advocate but the lazy, unoriginal take Maher is trying to repackage as an intellectual idea is so transparently false it shouldn't even require discussion. They've been pushing this bullshyt for years now, blaming video games and movies for mass shootings.
It's 2022, we shouldn't even acknowledge takes that can be disproven with a 5 second google search. Some of these things are common sense, we all know that Japan, Korea and China all consume more video games than US but they don't have these problems. We all know that Western media has a global reach and action films from foreign countries are even more violent than Hollywood stuff that tries to get a softer movie rating so it can reach broader public (it's a cause for celebration when a blockbuster gets an R rating).
Somehow right-wingers will consider everything except the most obvious reason for disparity in mass shootings between US and rest of the world ... guns.
So the only thing we should be discussing about Bill Maher is if blaming movies for gun violence makes him more stupid or more hypocritical. How can you in the same breath rail against cancel culture and also want to cancel violence in movies. How can you cry about 'woke culture' and 'feminization' but also cry about toxic masculinity of action heroes.
This is just so dumb on so many levels.
venge·ance - punishment inflicted or retribution exacted for an injury or wrong.No one says otherwise.
Lazy thinkers think that's why its happening in America when that is not close to reality. The ease of getting guns is why this shyt takes place.
Look at Maher's premise, he talks about vengeance. What vengeance was the monster who killed those babies in Uvalde exhibiting? What about the fukker in Buffalo? The guy who mowed down those people in Vegas?
Even in gun violence that doesn't get headline stories, it's not vengeance, it's stupid actions getting out of hand. What about our very high suicide rate from guns. Where is the vengeance in that?
It's lazy and doesn't address the real truth, which is the American way it seems. Look at everything else but the answer staring us in the face.
Everything you wrote here is of batshyt crazy people.venge·ance - punishment inflicted or retribution exacted for an injury or wrong.
Ehhhhhh most shootings are vengeance.. We as normal people, don't agree with the logic behind their "wrong".. But the shootings are definitely payback for what they felt they were wronged by... Lets take a look..
Uvalde.. Guy wanted payback for how he was teased for dressing like a woman.. The kids didn't tease him, but he wanted to hurt someone for the way he was "wrong" by being bullied.
Buffalo.. This man thought black people were actively eliminating his race from the planet with that white replacement bullshyt. So he was going to grab a gun, get armored up and get payback by killing us one by one. He wanted vengeance because his race was being "wronged" in his eyes
Vegas... We have no idea cause this guy didn't say shyt..
Columbine - bullied/wronged
Dylan Roof - said he wanted to kill blacks at that church "because black people rape white women every day"
Orlando Nightclub - Wrote he wanted vengeance (yes he used the word) for middle east bombings.. But others thought he was secretly gay and wanted to lash out after being rejected.. Both are vengeance
VA tech shooter - Wrote that the columbine shooters were martyrs. he wanted payback from the rich
2019 el paso shooter - another replacement theory shooter
I could go on but it's rare that a shooter is just batshyt crazy and shooting for no reason.. THEY usually have a reason made up and it's usually about revenge for wrong done