Biggest Scientific Discovery of the 21st Century? UPDATE: Simulations Support LK-99 as room temp Super Conductor

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,319
Reputation
627
Daps
16,866

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,200
Daps
620,150
Reppin
The Deep State
BUSTED
💥
👎
: LK-99 isn’t a superconductor — how science sleuths solved the mystery
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,838
Reputation
2,792
Daps
41,058
Reppin
Los Angeles
Pretty significant update regarding this. Everyone's eyes are on January 9th:




Meanwhile while we're busy arguing over DEI and interrupting schools like M.I.T, Harvard, etc. from doing what they're doing.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,838
Reputation
2,792
Daps
41,058
Reppin
Los Angeles
-10F. Much better than the normal range for most super conductors of current class, which is about -140C (-220F).

This one requires it to be about as cold as a fridge, which doesn't take as much energy consumption (at least not like our current class of superconductors that exist in the labs). If anything, would be highly operational through winter.

That said, we'll see what they have to say on the 9th. Not holding my breath, but great to know work is still being done to explore all possible routes on this material.
 
Last edited:

levitate

I love you, you know.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
39,707
Reputation
6,112
Daps
151,180
Reppin
The Multiverse
-10F. Much better than the normal range for most super conductors, which is about -140C (-220F).

This one requires it to be about as cold as a fridge, which doesn't take as much energy consumption (at least not like our current class of superconductors that exist in the labs). If anything, would be highly operational through winter.

That said, we'll see what they have to say on the 9th. Not holding my breath, but great to know work is still being done to explore all possible routes on this material.
Nevermind I was mathing wrong…

:snoop:

I put in 23C to F (and got about 73F) then just set it to negative (-73F)…

:snoop:
 

DatNkkaCutty

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
12,577
Reputation
4,619
Daps
82,528
Reppin
@ PA
For the slow folks....what does all this semi-conductor talk mean...and if VALID, what types of potential innovations, or inventions happen in the future?

How would life change, with this discovery? :patrice:
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
11,838
Reputation
2,792
Daps
41,058
Reppin
Los Angeles
For the slow folks....what does all this semi-conductor talk mean...and if VALID, what types of potential innovations, or inventions happen in the future?

How would life change, with this discovery? :patrice:
You know how you have an aerosol can and everything is bottled up? The compounds/chemicals in that can before they're dispersed have the potential to be put to use. However, once you spray that can you can't really take it back and put those compounds back into the can once again. Once it's out in the air and you didn't put the contents to use, that's basically potential put to waste.

That's kind of like the same principle with friction. The heat generated by the force of friction is basically waste.

You know how wires get hot? You can think of that as potential electric current traveling through those wires "dragging" through the material being lost to friction.

That is basically energy lost and not doing anything, meaning the energy generated by your batteries or power plants isn't fully making it to your homes/devices because it's getting lost in the wires as heat/friction. There is a large component of energy wasted due to internal resistance of the wires.

Now imagine all the source/transmission lines and all the devices around the world don't lose that kind of energy and it all makes it to devices 1:1 (and all the components that are inside these devices will not waste energy due to heat either). That's basically what a superconductor does: pure energy transfer, with, for the most part, no energy loss. Pure efficiency.

One of the downsides with superconductors and the practicality of it is they must be kept very cool (nearly 300 degrees below zero) in order to get this no loss of energy. It'd be a little difficult to have a transmission line be a superconductor because you'd have to find someway to keep it 300 degrees below zero for example. So the goal is to try and get these things to behave this way in room temperature or at a high enough temperature where it won't take much to cool it to get the superconductor effect.

That's basically what these people are getting close to here (hopefully): pure 1:1 energy transfer outside of the laboratory. That's just one thing. There's also implication when it comes to levitation and the like.

Further, given how common and potentially easy this synthesis is, it'll mean poor countries have all the resources to make this stuff. That's why this compound goes even above and beyond superconductors - it'd be highly inexpensive require materials we have in abundance (basically the ground).
 
Last edited:

DatNkkaCutty

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
12,577
Reputation
4,619
Daps
82,528
Reppin
@ PA
You know how you have an aerosol can and everything is bottled up? The compounds/chemicals in that can before they're dispersed have the potential to be put to use. However, once you spray that can you can't really take it back and put those compounds back into the can once again. Once it's out in the air and you didn't put the contents to use, that's basically potential put to waste.

That's kind of like the same principle with friction. The heat generated by the force of friction is basically waste.

You know how wires get hot? You can think of that as potential electric current traveling through those wires "dragging" through the material being lost to friction.

That is basically energy lost and not doing anything, meaning the energy generated by your batteries or power plants isn't fully making it to your homes/devices because it's getting lost in the wires as heat/friction. There is a large component of energy wasted due to internal resistance of the wires.

Now imagine all the source/transmission lines and all the devices around the world don't lose that kind of energy and it all makes it to devices 1:1 (and all the components that are inside these devices will not waste energy due to heat either). That's basically what a superconductor does: pure energy transfer, with, for the most part, no energy loss. Pure efficiency.

One of the downsides with superconductors and the practicality of it is they must be kept very cool (nearly 300 degrees below zero) in order to get this no loss of energy. It'd be a little difficult to have a transmission line be a superconductor because you'd have to find someway to keep it 300 degrees below zero for example. So the goal is to try and get these things to behave this way in room temperature or at a high enough temperature where it won't take much to cool it to get the superconductor effect.

That's basically what these people are getting close to here (hopefully): pure 1:1 energy transfer outside of the laboratory. That's just one thing. There's also implication when it comes to levitation and the like.

Further, given how common and potentially easy this synthesis is, it'll mean poor countries have all the resources to make this stuff. That's why this compound goes even above and beyond superconductors - it'd be highly inexpensive require materials we have in abundance (basically the ground).
:salute:
 
Top