Biden vs. The Supreme Court. Ready to propose term limits etc.....

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,053
Reputation
18,169
Daps
164,128
About time he need to executive push this shyt through
He can bully pulpit that shyt, but if Congress does not act, it goes nowhere.
Would be over ruled by the Supreme Court
Congress backs the bill, they can specifically carve out "Can not be ruled by the Supreme Court". Congress controls the Supreme Court in its scope and reach if it wants to.
I'd end judicial review if I were in power.
Ditto.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,101
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,140
Reppin
Above the fray.
you want supreme court judges determining the fate of the country for generations?

Why not? If we are in here arguing about if a Presidential candidate is "too old" to hold office then why would you want 80-year old out of touch judges on the court?
.
"Expanding the court" & "term limits" were ideas thrown around ahead of the 2016 election, by conservative radio and talking heads when it looked like Hillary was going to become president.
Hearing it said during Trump's term from talking heads on the other side of the table threw me off.

Elections have consequences. Sometimes dire consequences. Trying to overhaul parts of the SC membership rules because of the election results is not something that seems practical.

Competency/cognitive tests? Yes. Term limits? No
 

North of Death

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
4,286
Reputation
-526
Daps
11,818

He can bully pulpit that shyt, but if Congress does not act, it goes nowhere.

Congress backs the bill, they can specifically carve out "Can not be ruled by the Supreme Court". Congress controls the Supreme Court in its scope and reach if it wants to.

Ditto.
Supreme Court would over rule based on appeals...Have you not being paying attention to Edward Blum?
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,764
Reputation
3,015
Daps
131,781
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
If you’re not going to put a term limit on the House or Senate, then this move is just a waste of time. Revamp all of Congress and the leadership of this country and not just a select few.

Why would all the powers at be take power away from themselves?
 

DaHNIC82

Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
18,884
Reputation
5,041
Daps
81,993
Reppin
Off The Cuff Radio/ScrewballRadio/BudeBoyEnt
That's not how it works though. Look at since 2008. Democrats have won the General Election 3 out of the last 4 times and Conservatives still have a 6-3 majority.

It has nothing to do with "winning multiple elections"... it's about timing... We tried to tell everyone in 2016 how important that election was but some people ain't wanna listen.
Black people deal their part. Blame hector, Maria and the PAWGS for swinging that vote to Trump
 

DetroitEWarren

Superstar
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
18,721
Reputation
6,660
Daps
59,619
Reppin
Detroit You bytch Ass nikka
The only way Republicans can get anything passed is through the courts. The only way they get elected is through gerrymandering.

If gerrymandering is made illegal, term limits are in place, and it's easier to remove an unethical politician, you have effectively destroyed the modern conservative party. They will never win shyt again. They know it and they'll fight with any legal and illegal measures so they can keep scamming the public and tormenting minorities while pretending to care about America.
This post needs to be stickied. Real shyt. I been telling people this for years.

Dems have bad faith conversations like "if we pack the courts, Republicans will do the same", know that id they pack the courts and fix voting laws, Republicans will never get elected again until they put up somebody that actually cares about people. They can even be pro corporation, but 90% of the Republican party is anti people, that shyt would get deaded if they couldn't gerrymander districts.
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,053
Reputation
18,169
Daps
164,128
Supreme Court would over rule based on appeals...Have you not being paying attention to Edward Blum?
Im in the gym so I wont look that up just now but: Article III, Section 2, Clause 2, also known as the Exceptions Clause.

Google that. Congress can bush judicial review. In new legislation they can stop SC foolishness.
 

JamesJabdi

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,916
Reputation
766
Daps
22,803
too little too late....dudes had 4 years to put forward alot of shyt....but now wants to do something, when his time about to be up :martin:
 

ineedsleep212

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,104
Reputation
3,137
Daps
63,094
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
As good as all this is including the other proposals he mentioned today like capping rent increases,

charlie-brown-kick.gif


There's hardly a reason to believe they'd do anything.
 

North of Death

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
4,286
Reputation
-526
Daps
11,818
Im in the gym so I wont look that up just now but: Article III, Section 2, Clause 2, also known as the Exceptions Clause.

Google that. Congress can bush judicial review. In new legislation they can stop SC foolishness.
Why the fukk would Democrats and Republicans in Congress propose bushing Judicial review?
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,053
Reputation
18,169
Daps
164,128
Why the fukk would Democrats and Republicans in Congress propose bushing Judicial review?
See, now you being obtuse. You said
Would be over ruled by the Supreme Court
and I said they can carve that out. Its possible. That answers your first question. 2nd, PER LEGISLATION they can do it. They dont need to toss Judicial review entirely.
 
Top