Do you know why they're not getting the 4 billion initially but instead access to 3.1 billion?
Do you?
Stop shilling shyt Apu!
Do you know why they're not getting the 4 billion initially but instead access to 3.1 billion?
Do you?
You’re really too stupid to know what’s going on aren’t you?Stop shilling shyt Apu!
If I'm Black farmers, I'm pissed. Because now I have to share the pie with people with people it wasn't meant for. They could have at least made it $6B.
I wonder if they rewrote it to be lineage-based whether or not it would have passed the courts.
You pissed because white farmers found a way to block the original bill but the democrats found a way past that?
You act like I can't be pissed at both things.
But of course, no one addresses the issue of making it lineage-based and whether that would hold up in the courts.
The way the white folks got it blocked is because a court found it illegal to distribute the funds based on race.
So the whole lineage based thing has already been addressed.
You’re really too stupid to know what’s going on aren’t you?
Lineage and race are not the same. So no, it hasn't.
Ok while you have fun debating that shyt up the courts trying to be slick black farmers need help NOW and they are getting it.
Wrong.
This will always be a legal hurdle because the "black only" thing will never fly.
How do you know? They can it just like the Native Americans now. Magically, the Black apps fall to the bottom, or get delayed, while cacs and whoever else gobble up all the money. Same old play.Ok while you have fun debating that shyt up the courts trying to be slick black farmers need help NOW and they are getting it.
I don't need for you to tell me the why. I know the why. And its bullshyt.
Colorblind legislation to address the ills of black people is like taking Tylenol for an infection. It doesn't work.
Its not acceptable and neither should black people find it acceptable and should continue making it an issue every election until a compromise can be made.
Bullshyt that black people can't be mentioned by race when for 360 years we were specifically mentioned by race to be excluded from participation in American society. It's very convenient that they could exclude us by by race, but when it's time to make restitution, race can't be mentioned. That is just as racist in a race-centric country and its absurd that the Dems and everyone else has just accepted it as the rule.
then you have to establish lineage. This way is faster and critics would say its filibustering.You act like I can't be pissed at both things.
But of course, no one addresses the issue of making it lineage-based and whether that would hold up in the courts.
This is wrong.I don't need for you to tell me the why. I know the why. And its bullshyt.
Colorblind legislation to address the ills of black people is like taking Tylenol for an infection. It doesn't work.
Its not acceptable and neither should black people find it acceptable and should continue making it an issue every election until a compromise can be made.
Bullshyt that black people can't be mentioned by race when for 360 years we were specifically mentioned by race to be excluded from participation in American society. It's very convenient that they could exclude us by by race, but when it's time to make restitution, race can't be mentioned. That is just as racist in a race-centric country and its absurd that the Dems and everyone else has just accepted it as the rule.