So sons of Africa refers to Swedes and Russians as well?
Or wait, I know ... maybe you should read THE WHOLE ESSAY by Ben Franklin, where he talks about the superiority of hiring labor instead of importing more black Slaves.
Digital History
Funny how the meaning of an essay changes when you read the whole thing instead of an excerpt.
Source? Book title? Author? Again, you just keep posting pictures with zero context. Most of that hyperlink isn't even in English.
Moreover, I still don't understand what you're arguing.
You claim that the Holy Roman Empire wasn't entirely black. Okay. So what's your assertion?
That most of the nobility was black?
That some of the nobility might have been black?
That Charles V was black because of a tapestry in Peru, a place Charles V never went, when literally every portrait ever painted of him suggests otherwise?
Some speculate that nobles with the last name of MOORE or SCHWARTZ may have had black ancestry. But the Moor's head isn't limited to to those noblemen or their relatives, which suggests a completely alternate explanations. In this book for example:
Blacks in the Dutch World: The Evolution of Racial Imagery in a Modern Society - Allison Blakely - Google Books
The Moor's head could be seen in noblemen named Moore....but also in the crest of noblemen who sailed to the Cape of Good Hope in Africa. Moors are also associated with the spice trade, so the Moor's head could have been a sign of wealth.
I'd also like to point out that 99% of the shyt that comes up is from random blogs. Zero credibility.