Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha
Superstar
where is the GAY gene located?Lol ya ok. Str8 and gay people are born that way. It not a disorder
where is the GAY gene located?Lol ya ok. Str8 and gay people are born that way. It not a disorder
They eat their children because they aren't sure they are theirs IE they eat the children that came from their mates hoing around. No animal in the animal kingdom eats its own children just for the fukk of it.Either way Im not here to argue about Gay people and their life style, i have no beef with them, I just feel the "nature" argument is only used by idiots.
cats eat some of their children in nature, should humans do the same? Lol
where is the GAY gene located?
So humans should do the same? Or if a human does it should they get a pass?They eat their children because they aren't sure they are theirs IE they eat the children that came from their mates hoing around. No animal in the animal kingdom eats its own children just for the fukk of it.
Oh call out degeneracy for what it is and be called gay.
Tired tactic.
Do tell me genetically or biologically what makes a person (man or female) makes a conscious decision to act in the cultural pattern of the opposite sex? When you can get back to me, until then be quiet when grown folks are talking.
Sexual inhibition. There is no such thing as genetic homosexuality. The very concept is an oxy moron if you think about it. Boologically you can most likely break down the chemical reaction of sexual attraction and or stimulation. The body and brain both react in a cohesive method that induces the urge for sexual stimulation. As you think it the body reacts. For a heterosexual person that becomes aroused by the opposite sex thier body reacts to allow that process of sexual stimulation to take place. The same thing occurs in homosexual(both man and women) stimulation. A person whose mind nor body is not stimulated by sexual suggestions of the opposite or same sex of any kind can not choose thier sexual preference.
This is not only a grown outlook but also common fukking sense.
Sexual inhibition is why people choose to copy social cues of opposite sex? You realize that would actually support my stance of it not being a biological factor but purely mental or a matter of socilaization, ie choice right? There is no biological mandate to copy social cues at all, cultural/social norms typically have no biological mandate to be the way they are, take for instance women wearing dresses and makeup while mean wear pants and no make up. Neither is biologically imperative, same as female social cues of mannerisms such as twisting hips, verbage "oh girl", clothing, and etc. These are things gay males will typically emulate for no reason other than a mentally trying to associate with another sex, which is gender dysmorphia, same with lesbian women who do their best to emulate men in dressing in men clothes, trying to hold themselves as men, cutting their hair as men, and some even walking around with simulated male falluses. Its a mental illness.
The fact that there are noted people that have fluid sexual orientations and self-admittedly so, kills your argument that people can not choose who they are attracted to, compounded by the fact that there is no scientific research that proves a biological link to sexual orientation, it again leads more to socialization, ie choice, rather than being born a certain way and it being out of the person's control.
That said all life is driven by the need to survive and procreate, homosexuality itself is opposite of this normal living imperative and if a peson was born this way predispositiioned as such, they would be defective human being mentally, no different than being born retarded or on the autistic spectrum and we'd say they need help to normalize, not lift them on a pedestal and claim that they are just as normal as the rest of us and try to socialize kids to be like them.
Retardation and Autism are both conditions that show obvious signs of mental disabilty. Homosexuality does not as there is clear proof that sexual preference does not prohibit the mind from functioing properly. You could argue that point from the stance point of being heterosexul but thats pure speculation based on what people think is "normal". The true question is...is homosexuality "normal".
Based on several factors that we can use as evidence we can assume that it is. One main factor being the overwhelimng truth that same sex attraction occurs in almost all species across the board. Rather attraction is purely platonic or sexual does not matter.
Men are naturally attracted to other men and women the same. Notice I didnt say sexually. Most same sex freindships rely on attraction one way or the other. Not to skew definitions just add a realsitic insight.
Men who are sexually attracted to other men are no different. They just associate thier attractions with sexual orientation. Naturally they are attracted to cetain qualities that other person may have which again is what most same sex freindships rely on. Where it differs of cours is the want to engage in sexual relations with that person. Amd vice versa.
That want or inhibition may be a more extreme example of natural stimulation but it does offer truth in regards to natural attraction and what is deemed to be unnatural. The gay man is looked down upon in society because of the males desire to be dominant and a lover of woman.
We as a society have become so entranced with the idealism of manhood that too many of us honestly believe that getting p*ssy is ultimate requirement for manhood. Which is just not correct. Men and women who choose to identify as the opposite sex are a clear sign of this. A efeminine man may choose to act in a mannerism of a woman but still enjoy being with women. Ie; Prince...a Butch woman may dress like a man but still desrires vaginal penentration....the waters of what is defined as natural are far to muddy for anyone person to indicate what is natural or a mental condition.
Your belief is based on opinion. Not fact.Yet you hold it to be truthful based on your own feeble outlook on the world. To define mental retardation based on sexual orientation is just dumb man. To compare sexual preference to the likes of autism while insinuating its a choice is dumb as well. Like many you dont like gay men. Which is weird because the male black population loves the phrase my girl got a girlfriend. Many indulge in artist who talk about threesoms and women eating other women out. But mention gay rights...and its black power and fukk gays and all this. Which again nust comes down to the dislike of male homosexulity. Which comes down to the male ego. Which comes doqn to gender assignment. Which as I explained is quite a blurred line. This is also why many men hate butch lesbians but would give thier left nut to engage in a sexual encounter with feminine ones.....its all bullshyt breh....
I would argue homosexuality is just as much a disability as the inabiltiy to read social cues on the low end of the austic spectrum scale. They have an issue thinking as a normal human, they are damaged, your opinion on how much the disability matters is irrelevant to the notion that it is clearly leaves on in an abnormal state.
Same sex attraction occuring in species means very little in normalcy. Austism appears in other species as well as well as other forms of retardation, such as Down's Syndrome, so your argument has no weight at all, unless you want to say Down's Syndrome and Austism and other defects that occur in humans and animals are also "normal" and shouldn't be treated because they occur in other species as well.
Walking through the mental gymnastics that people go through have little to do with the issue being mental (my argument) and the fact that its still abnormal behavior. doesn't really matter how someone on the austistic spectrum sees things, when the fact is regardless of how they process events and stimuli they still fail at reading social cues, does it?
Gender dysmorphia isn't an opinion its a subset of general body dysmorphia, these are medically documented conditions. As for the homosexuality being abnormal, why wouldn't it be, again it is understood that the primary agency of all living entities is to survive their environment and procreate, homosexuality mentally stops those afflicted with it in procreating. this is basic logic, and I don't understand how acknowledging these facts leads to one being called feeble minded, but hey seems about right for you true believers.
Homosexuality is a choice because its a statement of sexual behavior.
That said the mental makeup that causes it is the malfunction like autism or other types of body dysmorphia
Again disease states lile Autism are clear mental disability...scientifically proven. Key word DISABILITY....homosexuality is not a disability breh. Could one argue it is a mental distortment...perhaps. But that disortment doesnt reside in the catagory of mental illness, retardation, nor chemical imbalance.
Further more there are countless actual gay people who have clearly documented that thier sexual orientation is not a choice.
Now your not gay, but you state it is...now in this scenario picture how you sound. Its as ridicolous as a paraplegic being told about the hardships being able to walk.
Yeah a mental disability like homosexuality, which have self explanatory in how it is a disability.
Homosexuality is not a disability? How is a person who is so mentally disturbed that they take actions against their biological imperative, how is that person healthy?
It is just as mentally distorted as those with OCD, those who body build and have body dismorphia, bulemics and anorexics.
I never said it was a chemical imbalance by the way.
There are numerous gays who say their sexual actions were indeed their choice, bisexuals who picked a sex, homosexuals who have switched, and etc. That is anecdotal though, what we can say is there is no biological/genetic evidence to suggest that the issue is anything but the result of a mental issue at worse, that still has to be acted on by whoever suffers from it, no different than kleptomaniacs still have the choice in whether they steal or not.
Paraplegics are physically unable to walk, that is something they can not link to homosexuality, ie a physical/biological defect that makes a person gay. Terrible analogy.