that shyt was truly the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard on here.
Mods, bush this thread
that shyt was truly the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard on here.
Mods, bush this thread
Either way Im not here to argue about Gay people and their life style, i have no beef with them, I just feel the "nature" argument is only used by idiots.Gay people have a fitness of zero naturally because they cannot reproduce. So nature will accordingly weed them out of the gene pool.
Life has no actual purpose. Human life has no actual purpose. The life that humans create has no actual purpose. The meanings/purposes that we, as human beings, assign to these natural occurrences are subjective. They are out of our own prejudice and desire to make sense of our own existence.propagation of the species is the core purpose for living beings
There are actually EvBio theories that accounts for homosexuality in nature, and points to its role in the propagation and survival of our species.You just said this: "Evolution, biology and/or nature has no goal"
That's horse shyt.
The goals are: propagation of the species, survival of the fittest, adaptation to the environment.
Now you're trying to use the same logic in terms of murder? No, we don't have organs for the specific purpose of committing murder....but we do for reproduction.
This is why sexual arousal is so strong, motherly instinct, it's why there's 7.5 billion people on this fukking planet....propagation of the species is the core purpose for living beings. You've clearly never studied biology.
Do you take any kind of medication? Serious question.
- Biology and sexual orientation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSome scholars[57] have suggested that homosexuality is adaptive in a non-obvious way. By way of analogy, the allele (a particular version of a gene) which causes sickle-cell anemia when two copies are present may also confer resistance to malaria with a lesser form of anemia when one copy is present (this is called heterozygous advantage).[58]
The so-called "gay uncle" hypothesis posits that people who themselves do not have children may nonetheless increase the prevalence of their family's genes in future generations by providing resources (food, supervision, defense, shelter, etc.) to the offspring of their closest relatives. This hypothesis is an extension of the theory of kin selection. Kin selection was originally developed to explain apparent altruistic acts which seemed to be maladaptive. The initial concept was suggested by J.B.S. Haldane in 1932 and later elaborated by many others including John Maynard Smith,W. D. Hamilton and Mary Jane West-Eberhard.[59] This concept was also used to explain the patterns of certain social insects where most of the members are non-reproductive.
Mental = the brain. Animals have brains and neural networks.animals don't have spirits...
There are actually EvBio theories that accounts for homosexuality in nature, and points to its role in the propagation and survival of our species.
People often conflate survival with propagation, but overpopulation is a factor that nature must account for.
- Biology and sexual orientation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Life has no actual purpose. Human life has no actual purpose. The life that humans create has no actual purpose. The meanings/purposes that we, as human beings, assign to these natural occurrences are subjective. They are out of our own prejudice and desire to make sense of our own existence.
Uhh, yes it has. It's not some fringe theory, it's pretty well known within the EvBio community. Kin Selection has been widely observed in the natural world, and is considered to be one of the most foundational beliefs in this field. Also, Richard Dawkins isn't "some dude", he's like the father or modern Evolutionary BiologyThat hasn't been peer reviewed or widely supported at all....that's just one dude suggesting something.
Did you even read the post or watch the video? The point is that homosexulity is consistent with self-preservation and propagation of the species. Imagine what kind of society we would be living in if everyone was virile and heterosexual. It's like saying death isn't consistent with self-preservation and propagation of the speciesThe fact that the vast majority of any species has self preservation and propagation of the species in mind....whatever negligible abnormalities(homosexuality) is just that...negligible.
Your assumption that procreation is done out of some desire or responsibility to preserve the human race rather than just a natural tendency is out of your own human desire to make sense of your own existence. No one is being disadvantaged in the subjective world of the human experience if a man doesn't reproduce. Its just something we humans do--reproduce. Theres a nuance there that I don't think you are understanding. To take a natural occurrence like reproduction, and to then proclaim that natural occurrence as the purpose of it all is out of your own prejudice. There are natural occurrences, and then there are the meanings we [human beings] attach to those natural occurrences.to the fact that propagation of the species and self preservation
They gonna create a pill that reverses homosexuality or something?
So there's hope for these fine lesbians to revert back.
No such thing as lesbians .. Give any girl alive some good dicc n she'll love it
Uhh, yes it has. It's not some fringe theory, it's pretty well known within the EvBio community. Kin Selection has been widely observed in the natural world, and is considered to be one of the most foundational beliefs in this field. Also, Richard Dawkins isn't "some dude", he's like the father or modern Evolutionary Biology
Sperm competition and the persistence of genes for male homosexuality. - PubMed - NCBI
Male Homosexuality Study: Gay Men Have Evolutionary Benefit For Their Families, New Research Suggests
How Gay Uncles Pass Down Genes
Did you even read the post or watch the video? The point is that homosexulity is consistent with self-preservation and propagation of the species. Imagine what kind of society we would be living in if everyone was virile and heterosexual. It's like saying death isn't consistent with self-preservation and propagation of the species
That hasn't been peer reviewed or widely supported at all....that's just one dude suggesting something.
The fact that the vast majority of any species has self preservation and propagation of the species in mind....whatever negligible abnormalities(homosexuality) is just that...negligible.