YOU NEED STRETCH 4'S IN THIS CURRENT LEAGUE, BRODIE.WHY DO U DO THIS?
HE SHOT 32.1% AND ALSO AVERAGED 16.4 POINTS WITH 9.3 BOARDS....HE'S A 6'9 FORWARD, NOT SPOSTA BE A KNOCK DOWN SHOOTER.
YOU NEED STRETCH 4'S IN THIS CURRENT LEAGUE, BRODIE.WHY DO U DO THIS?
HE SHOT 32.1% AND ALSO AVERAGED 16.4 POINTS WITH 9.3 BOARDS....HE'S A 6'9 FORWARD, NOT SPOSTA BE A KNOCK DOWN SHOOTER.
He's inconsistent like many young players not a reason to trade him imoD'Lo was a streaky shooter. Yeah he had those great games that you mentioned, but he'd also have a bunch of games where he couldn't hit open shots.
He's inconsistent like many young players not a reason to trade him imo
Stop man you were caping for dude hard. Russell performed much better than Ingram last year. You don't have to cape for this front office, they fukked up plain and simple.
Luke Walton didn't hate D'Lo not sure where you are getting that from. Dude is 21, young ppl are immatureMaybe I was caping for him because he was a Laker.
I hope Russell goes to the Nets and averages 20 ppg but to say he was a bright spot is not true. Sure he had his moments but he was inconsistent as fukk and from all accounts, he was cancerous to the culture. Byron Scott hates you AND Luke Walton?
He'll be way better on the Nets tho so I'm happy for him. He just seemed way into hollywood.
Russell and Randle both had better rookie years than Ingram.
I think Ingram is going to be dope moving forward, but his rookie season was terrible. He improved a lot as the season went on, but he was bad no matter how you slice it.
Brehs we need to give them some time to decide if this was a good trade not.. It's been said earlier that it feels like this trade was to set up another move... Be patientStop man you were caping for dude hard. Russell performed much better than Ingram last year. You don't have to cape for this front office, they fukked up plain and simple.
Luke Walton didn't hate D'Lo not sure where you are getting that from. Dude is 21, young ppl are immature
They had better seasons as far as numbers. sure. But MCW had a great rookie season numbers wise too. When they all played at their best, who did you look at and say I see it. Randle? Russell? Ingram? . Ingram showed way more his rookie season than both did. I don't caree about the numbers. Why else do you think BI is off limits? Because of numbers?
So why did Luke say Lonzo came in to improve the culture and everyone on twitter is acknowledging that it's a clear shot at DLO?
Bruh, Luke benched him when DLO was having his best run.
Randle will always be ass defensively. Ingram's potential is much higher than Randle's and at his best, he looked a lot better.Actually playing at their absolute best Randle looked the best, he was downright dominant in a few games. Ingram at his best looked really good but with him you also have a feeling that his ascension is inevitable. With Randle I get why a lot of people question if he can put it all together consistently.
Actually playing at their absolute best Randle looked the best, he was downright dominant in a few games. Ingram at his best looked really good but with him you also have a feeling that his ascension is inevitable. With Randle I get why a lot of people question if he can put it all together consistently.