Baddest Afro Descent Women: Day 58 - African-Americans!!!!!!

[K.Dot]

nikkas still believe that myth

 

[BmoreGorilla]

nikkas still believe that myth

We're not black enough according to them but they all up in our culture tho

 

[IllmaticDelta]

nikkas still believe that myth

it's odd to even question it considering the "afro" Dominicans, Brazilians, Ricans, Cape Verdeans etc..that were posted were probably on avg, genetically closer to 50/50

 

[IllmaticDelta]

..

.

 

[K.Dot]

We're not black enough according to them but they all up in our culture tho

it's odd to even question it considering the "afro" Dominicans, Brazilians, Ricans, Cape Verdeans etc..that were posted were probably on avg, genetically closer to 50/50

I don't even understand how someone can entertain that bs. Do they not live in the US? There is no way some macro scale race mixing is going on in this country of all places. It's BS, even with all the slave rape, 30%? Hell nah.

 

[Black Barbie]

(same person)

You should post some of her sister.

 

[IllmaticDelta]

(same)


.
.

(same)

 

[IllmaticDelta]

.





(same person)

.
.
.












(same person)

 

[Pineal Gland]

10

 

[TEH]

I wouldn't stand a chance

Damn right you wouldn't stand a chance with Mrs. TreeElecHuggica

 

[K.O.N.Y]

three more votes to go

EDIT-POST STATED WHEN WE WERE AT 97 VOTES

 

[im_sleep]

I don't even understand how someone can entertain that bs. Do they not live in the US? There is no way some macro scale race mixing is going on in this country of all places. It's BS, even with all the slave rape, 30%? Hell nah.

Right. Theres too many varying factors with these DNA tests that they don't disclose.

Where are they from? Where are there families from?
Do they have very recent white ancestry (parent, grandparent) while self identifying as Black?

This notion that African Americans are only 70% African on avg is laughable. But as you see, nikkas quick to either wanna use it against us, or celebrate it so they can claim being mixed or some dumb shyt.

 

[Mojo Jojo Morpheus]

I don't even understand how someone can entertain that bs. Do they not live in the US? There is no way some macro scale race mixing is going on in this country of all places. It's BS, even with all the slave rape, 30%? Hell nah.

Right. Theres too many varying factors with these DNA tests that they don't disclose.

Where are they from? Where are there families from?
Do they have very recent white ancestry (parent, grandparent) while self identifying as Black?

This notion that African Americans are only 70% African on avg is laughable. But as you see, nikkas quick to either wanna use it against us, or celebrate it so they can claim being mixed or some dumb shyt.

Edit:
Figured these stats in the quote below would provide insight to questions raised by this thread so I'm adding them here...​

The three southern African American populations
(New Orleans, Houston, and Charleston) show a wide
range of admixture values (11.6%–22.5%). The
Charleston population is of special interest because data
on admixture proportions in African Americans from
the former southern British colonies (South Carolina and
Georgia) have been used to postulate differences in gene
flow between the northern and southern African American
populations. The population of Charleston shows
the lowest m value (11.6%) of all the U.S. populations
analyzed in the present study, but it is not very different
from the estimates of one of the northern African American
populations—namely, Philadelphia. It would be
very interesting to have data on additional samples of
southern African American populations to confirm the
existence of a low European contribution in this particular
area and to study the extent of heterogeneity in the
admixture proportions at this geographical level.



In any case, our study shows that not all the southern
African American populations have as low a European
genetic contribution as that found in the Charleston sample.
The estimate forHouston (16.9%) is similar to other
values observed in northern urban populations (Detroit
and Baltimore), and New Orleans shows the highest m
value of the cities studied (22.5%), which deserves special
attention. The history of the Louisiana territory has
been quite different from the history of other southern
regions in the United States. This area was under French
rule for a substantial period, until it became part of the
Spanish territory in 1763 and, finally, of the United
States some decades later, in 1803. Both the geographic
origin of the slaves imported to Louisiana and their
status during the French domination have been distinct
from what happened in the southern British colonies
(e.g., South Carolina). There have been historical accounts
of more substantial intermixture in the New Orleans
area (Williamson 1995; Piersen 1996), so this
could partly explain the observed differences in ancestral
proportions between Charleston and New Orleans.


- Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
1998
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(07)61628-0?cc=y=

 

[Mojo Jojo Morpheus]

A bit of hyperbole but it got the point across.
And as of this post, there are more 10 votes for AAs than all other votes combined in other polls.
I don't feel bad at all

 

[K.Dot]

Breh no, that shyt is . Didn't the census from a while back disprove this?