Arabials on that MollyWatr? ...... 
AUSTRALIAN WOMAN ganged rape, she get jailed for 8 months for having sex (Sharia Law)
- Thread starter valet
- Start date
some women have fantasy's about being raped 
I've heard it before, and sohh has brethren @DreadHead P
I've heard it before, and sohh has brethren @DreadHead P
Last edited by a moderator:
Ridiculous. Your solutions are trash. For a married woman to avoid rape they should not deny their husbands sex. Thats not a problem i have because i kniw brazillian jiujitsu which makes me desireable 24 hrs a day. im glad you underatand how real the world is though. I hope ud advise women traveling to this nation to not drink with men. You seem stubborn though so youd probably give bad advice that would put her in danger
More "coulda shoulda woulda" talk from you. We don't live in a fantasy world where all men won't rape if their wives are perfect. Let's stay in the real world and stick with the facts and figures we have, which all indicate that your wife is less likely to be raped if she spends less time around you, since strangers are less likely to rape her than you are. The same is true for your seed. You do want them to be safe, don't you?
Black girls rejecting you in HS
Russian chicks aborting your seed without your consent. Tomato/Tomahto.
real good off this in two weeks: May 28th
malbaker86
Gators
Punishing the woman who was raped isn't from Sharia. The four witness bit is required to either lash the hell out of the guy or stone him to death. So these bedouin Arabs and dumb ass Pakistanis already 
there.
This is a common myth about Islamic criminal law. Rather, the four witness requirement applies only to the prescribed hadd punishment (which in the case of a married person could be death and for the non-married, 100 lashes). [Marghinani, Hidaya] This punishment is only applied in very rare cases, as is clear, and is meant to be a social deterrent, above all.
As the classical and contemporary jurists (such as Mufti Taqi Usmani) have made clear, a rapist can be convicted on lesser evidence (including scientific evidence, such as DNA tests and medical reports) for discretionary punishments. These discretionary punishments are left up to the legal system to determine.
However, it is a myth to say that Islam would in any way condone rape, or allow a rapist to go free for this terrible crime against an innocent human being and against society.
The female victim's testimony is sufficient to indicate a crime of rape when evidence contributes to this crime, such as bruises, scratches, etc.
There are numerous evidences of this when a woman reported a crime against her and the Prophet (saaw) detained, investigated, and so forth.
However whether the matter rises to zina` is another matter and discretionary punishment taazirat and mahr are deemed part of the lesser prosecution.
There are several degrees of 'rape', from mere coercion to hiraba- kidnapping, imprisonment, rape, beating, etc.
So if a perpetrator uses a weapon on a woman, beating her, shooting her, injuring her, kidnaps, imprisons and transports her elsewhere, rapes her, this could rise to the degree of hiraba which is the more severe crime, likely warranting a death sentence.
An event concerning rape had in fact led towards the Prophet Muhammad (P) punishing a rapist without demanding or even hinting for four witnesses:
Many Muslim scholars use this ayah for rape and other crimes. Rape constitutes fasaad.
“The recompense of those who wage war against Allaah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter”
[al-Maaidah 5:33]
Four witnesses is normally impossible so the judge should determine based on the evidence put forth to deter men from doing this crime. If I was the judge in this case, I would have ordered the man to be killed or lashed and the woman wouldn't have suffered the harassment here of being locked up.
there.This is a common myth about Islamic criminal law. Rather, the four witness requirement applies only to the prescribed hadd punishment (which in the case of a married person could be death and for the non-married, 100 lashes). [Marghinani, Hidaya] This punishment is only applied in very rare cases, as is clear, and is meant to be a social deterrent, above all.
As the classical and contemporary jurists (such as Mufti Taqi Usmani) have made clear, a rapist can be convicted on lesser evidence (including scientific evidence, such as DNA tests and medical reports) for discretionary punishments. These discretionary punishments are left up to the legal system to determine.
However, it is a myth to say that Islam would in any way condone rape, or allow a rapist to go free for this terrible crime against an innocent human being and against society.
The female victim's testimony is sufficient to indicate a crime of rape when evidence contributes to this crime, such as bruises, scratches, etc.
There are numerous evidences of this when a woman reported a crime against her and the Prophet (saaw) detained, investigated, and so forth.
However whether the matter rises to zina` is another matter and discretionary punishment taazirat and mahr are deemed part of the lesser prosecution.
There are several degrees of 'rape', from mere coercion to hiraba- kidnapping, imprisonment, rape, beating, etc.
So if a perpetrator uses a weapon on a woman, beating her, shooting her, injuring her, kidnaps, imprisons and transports her elsewhere, rapes her, this could rise to the degree of hiraba which is the more severe crime, likely warranting a death sentence.
An event concerning rape had in fact led towards the Prophet Muhammad (P) punishing a rapist without demanding or even hinting for four witnesses:
Many Muslim scholars use this ayah for rape and other crimes. Rape constitutes fasaad.
“The recompense of those who wage war against Allaah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter”
[al-Maaidah 5:33]
Four witnesses is normally impossible so the judge should determine based on the evidence put forth to deter men from doing this crime. If I was the judge in this case, I would have ordered the man to be killed or lashed and the woman wouldn't have suffered the harassment here of being locked up.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
"wrong place, wrong time"
mods really need to start going after some of the ignorant posters
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Punishing the woman who was raped isn't from Sharia. The four witness bit is required to either lash the hell out of the guy or stone him to death. So these bedouin Arabs and dumb ass Pakistanis already
This is a common myth about Islamic criminal law. Rather, the four witness requirement applies only to the prescribed hadd punishment (which in the case of a married person could be death and for the non-married, 100 lashes). [Marghinani, Hidaya] This punishment is only applied in very rare cases, as is clear, and is meant to be a social deterrent, above all.
As the classical and contemporary jurists (such as Mufti Taqi Usmani) have made clear, a rapist can be convicted on lesser evidence (including scientific evidence, such as DNA tests and medical reports) for discretionary punishments. These discretionary punishments are left up to the legal system to determine.
However, it is a myth to say that Islam would in any way condone rape, or allow a rapist to go free for this terrible crime against an innocent human being and against society.
The female victim's testimony is sufficient to indicate a crime of rape when evidence contributes to this crime, such as bruises, scratches, etc.
There are numerous evidences of this when a woman reported a crime against her and the Prophet (saaw) detained, investigated, and so forth.
However whether the matter rises to zina` is another matter and discretionary punishment taazirat and mahr are deemed part of the lesser prosecution.
There are several degrees of 'rape', from mere coercion to hiraba- kidnapping, imprisonment, rape, beating, etc.
So if a perpetrator uses a weapon on a woman, beating her, shooting her, injuring her, kidnaps, imprisons and transports her elsewhere, rapes her, this could rise to the degree of hiraba which is the more severe crime, likely warranting a death sentence.
An event concerning rape had in fact led towards the Prophet Muhammad (P) punishing a rapist without demanding or even hinting for four witnesses:
Many Muslim scholars use this ayah for rape and other crimes. Rape constitutes fasaad.
The recompense of those who wage war against Allaah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off from opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter
[al-Maaidah 5:33]
Four witnesses is normally impossible so the judge should determine based on the evidence put forth to deter men from doing this crime. If I was the judge in this case, I would have ordered the man to be killed or lashed and the woman wouldn't have suffered the harassment here of being locked up.
that's all fine and dandy FAH but the reality of current situations is far far different
