Atheism is destroying black minds.

[the cac mamba]

having faith in a false idol in the sky that has your back, when that thing doesnt exist and doesnt have your back, has never helped anyone in any tangible sense

yea belief and all that, but dont pretend like any religion can claim tangible support from god. you're all just talking to the air

in the meantime, horrific things happen on earth and 'god' is nowhere in sight

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

having faith in a false idol in the sky that has your back, when that thing doesnt exist and doesnt have your back, has never helped anyone in any tangible sense

Using a straw man as an argument is a logical fallacy and doesn't help your case.​

yea belief and all that, but dont pretend like any religion can claim tangible support from god. you're all just talking to the air

This entire sentence makes no sense since you haven't defined 'religion' or 'g-d'.
​

in the meantime, horrific things happen on earth and 'god' is nowhere in sight

This sentence is illogical for three reasons: What do YOU mean by 'G-d', how would someone 'see' it, and 'horrible' is subjective.

Thanks for further proving that atheism is illogical, though.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Exactly lol taking information as it is presented to you through research and not holding it dearly to your chest is simply the most non-presumptuous stance you can take.

Sounds like you're talking about yourself and upset that you've been used. My bad. My point wouldn't have been made as well had I told you my intentions prior to the exchange.​

 

[the cac mamba]

Using a straw man as an argument is a logical fallacy and doesn't help your case.​

This entire sentence makes no sense since you haven't defined 'religion' or 'g-d'.
​

This sentence is illogical for three reasons: What do YOU mean by 'G-d', how would someone 'see' it, and 'horrible' is subjective.

Thanks for further proving that atheism is illogical, though.​

how could atheism possibly be "illogical" compared to religion when, for example, christians and muslims are certain about two things that cant coexist. LOGIC would tell you that jesus is gods son, or he isnt. which means either one religion is wrong, which is comedy. or god doesnt care, rendering the importance they place on it, unimportant. which is the answer?

im not really interested in your vague bullshyt tbh, you dont take a stance on anything. you cant even answer the simple question "are you religious and believe in a god or religion"

i'm gonna give you this argument, you're a clown you win breh. take your vague nonsense elsewhere. theres really no arguing with the fact i stated that no religion can prove divine intervention

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

how could atheism possibly be "illogical" compared to religion when, for example, christians and muslims are certain about two things that cant coexist

What can't coexist?​

im not really interested in your vague bullshyt tbh, you dont take a stance on anything. you cant even answer the simple question "are you religious and believe in a god or religion"

Incorrect. I have taken a stance. Nothing vague about it. Told you I wasn't religious and I have no idea what you mean by 'G-d' so your question about it makes no sense.​

i'm gonna give you this argument, you're a clown you win breh.

I 'win' because your arguments suck, b.​

take your vague nonsense elsewhere. theres really no arguing with the fact i stated that no religion can prove divine intervention

Nothing vague about theological noncognitivism. It's very cut-and-dry.

Doesn't matter what you stated since 'divine intervention' is a meaningless term like 'G-d', 'spirit', 'soul', etc.
​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

How is NOT having a belief illogical?

YOU have a belief and have stated it numerous times. Prove it or it is illogical.​

And religion isn't open to anything new. Its the BELIEVERS who keep creating shyt.

Nonsense.​

 

[10:31]

how could atheism possibly be "illogical" compared to religion when, for example, christians and muslims are certain about two things that cant coexist. LOGIC would tell you that jesus is gods son, or he isnt. which means either one religion is wrong, which is comedy. or god doesnt care, rendering the importance they place on it, unimportant. which is the answer?

im not really interested in your vague bullshyt tbh, you dont take a stance on anything. you cant even answer the simple question "are you religious and believe in a god or religion"

i'm gonna give you this argument, you're a clown you win breh. take your vague nonsense elsewhere. theres really no arguing with the fact i stated that no religion can prove divine intervention

GOT EMMMMMMMMMM

 

[the cac mamba]

What can't coexist?
​

i want you to address this simple circumstance. i know you arent about answering direct questions. but give it a shot

christians say that jesus is god/the son of god. the holy trinity. muslims say nah, he was just a prophet

this leaves us with 2 options:

-one of the religions is wrong

-they're both right because god doesnt care, rendering the importance they place on their religion, relatively meaningless

which is it?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

i want you to address this simple circumstance. i know you arent about answering direct questions. but give it a shot

christians say that jesus is god/the son of god. the holy trinity. muslims say nah, he was just a prophet

Define 'G-d'.


​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

GOT EMMMMMMMMMM

ORLY?

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13244600/

They've been trying for years and have yet to succeed.

​

 

[the cac mamba]

Define 'G-d'.


​

prove my point, brehs

the bible and quran define this abrahamic god, you pseudo intellectual. you accused me of being illogical for rejecting that god, so where does that leave me?

jesus answer the question. at least attempt to answer it or post something in the general vicinity

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

prove my point, brehs

You have neither a point nor a valid argument.​

the bible and quran define this abrahamic god, you pseudo intellectual. you accused me of being illogical for rejecting that god, so where does that leave me?

Neither text defines 'G-d'. They give secondary/relational/negative attributes but utterly fail to tell anyone what this entity actually is.

You are illogical for vehemently rejecting nothing as well as creating/using various and sundry arguments against something that has no coherent ontology while resorting to ad hominems because your arguments just plain suck.​

jesus answer the question. at least attempt to answer it or post something in the general vicinity

Can't answer a question that makes no sense. Define 'G-d'.

​

 

[the cac mamba]

You have neither a point nor a valid argument.​

Neither text defines 'G-d'. They give secondary/relational/negative attributes but utterly fail to tell anyone what this entity actually is.

You are illogical for vehemently rejecting nothing as well as creating/using various and sundry arguments against something that has no coherent ontology while resorting to ad hominems because your arguments just plain suck.​

Can't answer a question that makes no sense. Define 'G-d'.

​

i asked you to address tangible belief systems. you cant do it

the funny thing is that we probably barely disagree. im open to a 'god' existing; my contention is that no human knows what it is, so christianity and islam are bullshyt. but you insist on caping for them

however, you completely sidestepped my question. trash, smart/dumb posting

 

[smARTmouf]

Everything is...as you believe it is. Imposing your thoughts or beliefs on others is a losing battle.

The very word illogical, is a trap....It's based on THAT persons beliefs system.

 

[the cac mamba]

Everything is...as you believe it is. Imposing your thoughts or beliefs on others is a losing battle.

The very word illogical, is a trap....It's based on THAT persons beliefs system.

to a muslim, the thought of jesus being god's son is illogical. but this dude @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited is just throwing it around like hes proving points