As the AB deal looks likely to go through, Stans all over social media are in #shambles

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,329
Reputation
6,676
Daps
109,576
Reppin
Bay Area
Nah.

COD on gamepass will absolutely positively lower the quality of the franchise.

MS wants to spread COD out even thinner than it is now. It’s already a yearly release.. now it will be a yearly release and also be on SWITCH.

A weak ass console with 2005 graphics will now be a platform devs will have to target. Innovation, ground breaking tech and visual fidelity? fukk that.. let’s let 8 year olds be able to play.

This is going to be their approach.

MS have zero ambition as a company and just want everyone to be able to play every piece of shyt everywhere.
This makes no sense. COD already comes out on PC which has incredibly better graphics and options than your trashstation 5 and it doesnt slow down production

Your garbage ass console has held back gaming for a decade due to its weak ass hardware, now this is your argument? :laff:

My man, you play on the honda civic of video gaming, you are the budget gamer.

Harsh realities
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
25,332
Reputation
6,445
Daps
87,082
Nah.

COD on gamepass will absolutely positively lower the quality of the franchise.

MS wants to spread COD out even thinner than it is now. It’s already a yearly release.. now it will be a yearly release and also be on SWITCH.

A weak ass console with 2005 graphics will now be a platform devs will have to target. Innovation, ground breaking tech and visual fidelity? fukk that.. let’s let 8 year olds be able to play.

This is going to be their approach.

MS have zero ambition as a company and just want everyone to be able to play every piece of shyt everywhere.

None of this is true :mjlol:

You pull shyt out of your ass and claim facts.

The emotional fanboy babble is strong keep crying. :umad:
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,683
Reputation
12,855
Daps
128,031
Nah.

COD on gamepass will absolutely positively lower the quality of the franchise.

MS wants to spread COD out even thinner than it is now. It’s already a yearly release.. now it will be a yearly release and also be on SWITCH.

A weak ass console with 2005 graphics will now be a platform devs will have to target. Innovation, ground breaking tech and visual fidelity? fukk that.. let’s let 8 year olds be able to play.

This is going to be their approach.

MS have zero ambition as a company and just want everyone to be able to play every piece of shyt everywhere.
COD is already spammed out.
The console versions are typically "inferior"
The switch versions will probably be cloud based.



All in all, COD if anything now can take more liberties if they so choose since they don't have to chase trends.


Now if the consumer base wants that or not is a different story all together
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,329
Reputation
6,676
Daps
109,576
Reppin
Bay Area
None of this is true :mjlol:

You pull shyt out of your ass and claim facts.

The emotional fanboy babble is strong keep crying. :umad:
COD is already spammed out.
The console versions are typically "inferior"
The switch versions will probably be cloud based.



All in COD if anything now can take more liberties if they so choose since they don't have to chase trends.


Now if the consumer base wants that or not is a different story all together
This man talking about cheap hardware as Sony shamelessly puts out the worst and cheapest VR hardware in the world to appeal to they broke boy stanbase :damn:

I run Apex on max settings gsynced to 144 hz, running upwards of 300 fps if I take off gysync

Apex is capped at 60 fps on playstation 5 :mjlol:

But he talking about hardware capabilities :mjlol:

Might be the dumbest argument ive seen in awhile :mjlol:
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
25,332
Reputation
6,445
Daps
87,082
COD is already spammed out.
The console versions are typically "inferior"
The switch versions will probably be cloud based.



All in all, COD if anything now can take more liberties if they so choose since they don't have to chase trends.


Now if the consumer base wants that or not is a different story all together
If he wanted to shyt on the switch, he could have at least been factual by saying it’s not as powerful as base last gen Hardware, but 2005 graphics is factually incorrect and hyperbolic (I’m guessing he’s basing it on low res Pokemon games and poorly optimised ports)… which invalidates his argument and proves his allegiance as a Pony.
 

BlackXCL

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,863
Reputation
401
Daps
14,134
Reppin
t.
This makes no sense. COD already comes out on PC which has incredibly better graphics and options than your trashstation 5 and it doesnt slow down production

Your garbage ass console has held back gaming for a decade due to its weak ass hardware, now this is your argument? :laff:

My man, you play on the honda civic of video gaming, you are the budget gamer.

Harsh realities
Don’t even bring up PC gaming my breh.

Absolutely useless gaming device. Not a single developer has taken advantage of all that extra horsepower, to make a game that truly shines for it… since Crysis.

The day a developer or publisher takes advantage of that horsepower is the day I become a PC gamer.

Hasn’t happened since Crysis.
None of this is true :mjlol:

You pull shyt out of your ass and claim facts.

The emotional fanboy babble is strong keep crying. :umad:
All of it is true. It’s already happening. The only thing I exaggerated on was the 2005 graphics. Ok, more like 2011.
COD is already spammed out.
The console versions are typically "inferior"
The switch versions will probably be cloud based.



All in all, COD if anything now can take more liberties if they so choose since they don't have to chase trends.


Now if the consumer base wants that or not is a different story all together
COD is already spread thin, but at least now it looks good visually. If it comes out on every platform known to man, you gonna sit here and tell me it won’t be watered down?
If he wanted to shyt on the switch, he could have at least been factual by saying it’s not as powerful as base last gen Hardware, but 2005 graphics is factually incorrect and hyperbolic (I’m guessing he’s basing it on low res Pokemon games and poorly optimised ports)… which invalidates his argument and proves his allegiance as a Pony.
Breh you never heard of an exaggeration? :wow:

I’m basing it on every switch game looking like utter shyt. Don’t care what the hell game you throw at me lol, it looks outdated and shytty.
 

rdj

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
985
Reputation
85
Daps
2,174
Don’t even bring up PC gaming my breh.

Absolutely useless gaming device. Not a single developer has taken advantage of all that extra horsepower, to make a game that truly shines for it… since Crysis.

The day a developer or publisher takes advantage of that horsepower is the day I become a PC gamer.

Hasn’t happened since Crysis.

All of it is true. It’s already happening. The only thing I exaggerated on was the 2005 graphics. Ok, more like 2011.

COD is already spread thin, but at least now it looks good visually. If it comes out on every platform known to man, you gonna sit here and tell me it won’t be watered down?

Breh you never heard of an exaggeration? :wow:

I’m basing it on every switch game looking like utter shyt. Don’t care what the hell game you throw at me lol, it looks outdated and shytty.
Yeah keep talking about taking advantage of hardware when the last 3 years your console has been playing games made for the ps4 and xbox one :beli:
 

BlackXCL

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,863
Reputation
401
Daps
14,134
Reppin
t.
Yeah keep talking about taking advantage of hardware when the last 3 years your console has been playing games made for the ps4 and xbox one :beli:
Unlike you, I’ve been calling out cross gen trash since the start.

Y’all have been pretending it’s great. And PC gamers have been acting like they’ve been getting anything more than higher resolution console games since 2007.

Enjoy paying thousands… for slightly higher resolution. :huhldup: :mjlol:

Not a single game will ever take full advantage of that 4080. :scust:

Facts. Don’t even try to deny it. Just trying to justify your purchase
 
Last edited:

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
22,540
Reputation
5,032
Daps
63,085
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
I don’t even care whatever way this deal goes but these ponies on YouTube bawling their eyes out like somebody gunned down a family member in cold blood :mjlol:
I'm not typically an acquirer of Activision games either. However, the influx of studios is going to be crazy. The next Xbox is going to have the greatest lineup ever. I say that without hyperbole.
 

Half A $

Pro
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
1,143
Reputation
60
Daps
1,985
I'm not typically an acquirer of Activision games either. However, the influx of studios is going to be crazy. The next Xbox is going to have the greatest lineup ever. I say that without hyperbole.
And than MS fumbles these new studios like their existing ones and still ends up in 3rd place but stans mention how many people playing COD on Samsung fridges :scust:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,346
Reputation
27,515
Daps
506,351
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
I'm not typically an acquirer of Activision games either. However, the influx of studios is going to be crazy. The next Xbox is going to have the greatest lineup ever. I say that without hyperbole.

still not 100% sold they won't fukk it up. Problem has always been leadership.

But buying established 3rd party publishers shouldn't be hard to fukk up.
 
Top