I dont think its style at all. If they played like this in the 90s/early 2000s the same folks complaining woulda lapped it up and be pining for it now. How do I know? We went from fast break up and down artistry for the first 40+ years to football on a court due to expansion. Scrubs that had no business in the league were in rotations bricking 2 pters. And everybody wants the football with the scrubs back. Because it looked good? No. Because they were kids with limited options and the GOAT (on court and marketing) or his kid was playing. I can objectively look back at that shyt as
. Just like plenty of stuff during the Attitude era ranged from to straight cringe but because you had Rock and Stone Cold around it was a golden era. The issue is that next transcendent star hasnt risen. And the old nikkas done held on longer than one could expect and that nikka still aint here.
BINGO.
I've made that analogy before too.
The Attitude era was the apex of my childhood. Subjectively, I still treat it as one of my more cherished periods of entertainment, that very few things come close to. Being objective, the large majority of it was unintentionally hilarious, gimmicky and straight-up unwatchable. I couldn't fathom thinking it was entertaining now. But because Rock, Stone Cold, Undertaker etc were at the center of it, they covered up all the bad about it.
90s NBA is absolutely no different.
Even the players were shytting on the product calling it diluted at the time, yet these cats on here just gloss over that because they don't want to come to terms with their childhood being a lie (at least, in part).