Never watched an episode. I'm not into watching majority white casted TV shows at all anymore. Never caught my eye.
Your acceptance or denial of truth is based on who said it and not the credence of what they're saying or not. So to you, if cacs or people from cac accredited organizations say it, its true. If they dont, its not. And then you turn around and pretend as if you're pro black
Thats my drip breh, get your own
First you was a duck duck goose ass nikka. Now you're a follow in another man's footsteps ass nikka. Im asking YOU, if YOU do not accept pictures, statues, and the word of people who were there at the time, then what do you accept?
Ala Daum: "That picture is damaged!! They're too dark
Ala Daum: "Here are the real original Egyptians!!!
Heres a black Peruvian:
But no, the people who actually match the pictures cant be them because everybody that looks like them is African. So the consensus is that the pictures are damaged and made them look that dark while leaving the white kings at the bottom that happened to be from Europe (oh except Charles 5) as "white"..
"I need the white man or his organizations to tell me history before I believe it" ass nikka
Your logic is that since contemporaries are the best at observing their time, whatever is depicted then is accurate - like your statues and that Peruvian manuscript.
So, according to your logic, paintings of Charles V, Hapsburg Holy Roman Emperor are accurate since they were created when he was alive. Why are you mad? It’s your logic!
So, you believe that black people are indigenous to the Americas and that Quechuas are just fake indigenous people. Since you just insinuated that Quechuas have been wiped out just like the Ancient Egyptians
Tell us how black people got to Peru O wise Hotep
@Everythingg - Still waiting on those peer-reviewed academic papers discussing the African Hapsburg Kings
You keep ducking addressing your own logic. I asked you what do YOU go by? If the statue of a black man holding the Habsburg family coat of arms isnt proof , if people from other side of the world (Peru) showing another Habsburg (Charles V) as being black doesnt count as proof, then why do the pictures of him being white count?
Why do you keep ducking what you saw from the link you provided that constituted proof of what they were saying being true?
So you believe that black Egyptians were the original Egyptians and that the modern Egyptians are just fake indigenous people?
This tapestry is called "the wild men and the moors". Of course, the black moors are on the defense and the white "wild men" are on the attack, and shoeless might I add. Melanated people were all over the world not just Africa. We dont believe your nonsense anymore because things like this exist. If you explain why we should accept how the cacs of today tell of history over what they said right then and there when it happened, maybe we could get further.
But if you're only gonna try to be like me and ask me the same things that Im asking you, then I'll continue to call you a duck duck goose ass nikka
"Academic" as in cac accredited schoolings right? You wont answer
And YOU keep saying African. I havent said they were African.
Ah! So you've finally understood the stupidity of your logic (re: relying solely upon pictures and statutes for historical claims). Took you long enough
I've said it three times. I've asked you for peer-reviewed academic papers (although you have said that you believe that only cacs engage in academic scrutiny). You're the one who's ducking
Also, provide receipts proving that black people are indigenous to the Americas since that's the new lie you're operating on
Oh sohh I think on a higher level than you
Instead of looking at fancy titles and what public school they went to, I look at what exactly they're saying and what evidence they have to support it
All it takes for you is a fancy title and a public school by their name and you drop the draws for whatever they have to give you
Receipts to you isnt based on evidence but is based on WHO is saying it. And worse enough, not based on people who were actually there...
Why do you keep stating that all education is cac. Your racist anti-blackness doesn't allow you to conceive of indigenous forms of African historical scholarship such as the Ibadan School
Ibadan School - Wikipedia
Are Nigerians cacs? They produced peer-reviewed academic papers about Nigerian history, but I guess academic rigour makes you white
I assure you, they have far less Neanderthal genetic ancestry than you
If you care so much about evidence, why can't you provide me evidence that has been checked and verified by other historians in a peer-reviewed process? Just so you know, Africans do this too (ex. Ibadan School of History).
I don't care about your hangup with your white ancestors. I just want to know why you don't have evidence for all the lies you're spewing.
As usual for the fake pro black, they start trying to use the "c00n" angle when backed into a corner.
I believe things based on EVIDENCE presented. Im not going to believe something because someone with a fancy title that went to a fancy school says it. If they say something AND present evidence thats one thing. But not if they're saying something and presenting evidence that contradicts what the people of that time period presented and said. Especially when its from a historical "black to white" angle such as one seen in Egypt...
And I ASSURE YOU, that you dont know my lineage to say anything about it..
Well Im pointing out that you go to other men to review the evidence for you instead of reviewing it yourself.
But your evidence is people from schools saying something about history and not the evidence from the time period
c00n angle? It's the truth. You are a c00n
You do a disservice to actual black scholars who are expanding thought by posting images from the internet screaming like a bytch
"European royals are black!" "Olmecs are black!" "African Americans are indigenous to America" like all the other online hotep. Embarrassing for black men worldwide.
I'm still waiting on that peer-reviewed evidence
And your lineage is quite clear.
Its whatever bruh. You're a low level thinker who needs other men to think for him. I look at the evidence presented and make a decision on what to believe myself. You look for men to follow