Are there any black people in Game of Thrones?

[TripleAgent]

But plenty of dragons and winter zombie looking fiends

Exactly...repped

 

[NoMayo15]

Idk if he's been mentioned but let us not forget Khalessi's second husband

 

[Everythingg]

OK

Habsburg moor in Germany. The Habsburgs were a GERMAN family that ruled over the (German)Catholic church in the middle ages. But I know nikkas dont like history unless it uplifts Africa (as if there werent nikkas in other places as well as Africa) so you probably wont even return...

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

Habsburg moor in Germany. The Habsburgs were a GERMAN family that ruled over the (German)Catholic church in the middle ages. But I know nikkas dont like history unless it uplifts Africa (as if there werent nikkas in other places as well as Africa) so you probably wont even return...

Nothing you posted proves your claim (black Africans ruled parts of Germany). Try harder. I’m opened minded if you can provide proof. A statue isn’t enough

 

[Everythingg]

Nothing you posted proves your claim (black Africans ruled parts of Germany). Try harder. I’m opened minded if you can provide proof. A statue isn’t enough

Then whats proof? The statue is of a black man, wearing royal clothing and jewelry, holding a Habsburg coat of arms. The Habsburgs:

The House of Habsburg (/ˈhæpsbɜːrɡ/; German: [ˈhaːpsbʊɐ̯k]; traditionally spelled Hapsburg in English), also called the House of Austria (Haus Österreich in German, Casa de Austria in Spanish),[1] was one of the most influential and distinguished royal houses of Europe. The throne of the Holy Roman Empire was continuously occupied by the Habsburgs from 1438 until their extinction in the male line in 1740. The house also produced emperors and kings of the Kingdom of Bohemia, Kingdom of England (Jure uxoris King), Kingdom of Germany, Kingdom of Hungary, Kingdom of Croatia, Kingdom of Illyria, Second Mexican Empire, Kingdom of Ireland (Jure uxoris King), Kingdom of Portugal, and Kingdom of Spain, as well as rulers of several Dutch and Italian principalities.

You so stuck on Africa that you dont know about other places black people ruled...

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

Then whats proof? The statue is of a black man, wearing royal clothing and jewelry, holding a Habsburg coat of arms. The Habsburgs:



You so stuck on Africa that you dont know about other places black people ruled...

A statue isn’t proof. That black African was likely just in the employ of the Habsurgs.

Why are you so desperate to be a part of European history?

 

[Everythingg]

A statue isn’t proof.

And I asked you what is proof? What is an example of what you would call proof of who the Habsburgs were? Got a answer?

That black African was likely just in the employ of the Habsurgs.

Cacs putting a black statue with royal clothing, decked in jewelry, holding THEIR coat of arms. While not leaving any statues of them theirselves holding the coat of arms.

Wanna go back to the drawing board?

Why are you so desperate to be a part of European history?

I never said those were my people or that I was a part of that history. Now why are you so stuck on Africa that you refuse to believe that "black" people ruled in other places other than Africa?

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

And I asked you what is proof? What is an example of what you would call proof of who the Habsburgs were? Got a answer?



Cacs putting a black statue with royal clothing, decked in jewelry, holding THEIR coat of arms. While not leaving any statues of them theirselves holding the coat of arms.

Wanna go back to the drawing board?




I never said those were my people or that I was a part of that history. Now why are you so stuck on Africa that you refuse to believe that "black" people ruled in other places other than Africa?

Africans ruled part of India until 1948. They are still there today.

You have no proof for your Hapsburg claim (you probably don’t even know who the Hapsburgs were since you’ve never studied history). There’s a lot of foolish historical claims on the Coli, such as claiming African-Americans are indigenous to the Americas. Your claim is just as silly. I’m fact, you belittle black scholarship on the African diaspora

Still waiting on proof from you

 

[Everythingg]

Africans ruled part of India until 1948. They are still there today.

Proof?

You have no proof for your Hapsburg claim (you probably don’t even know who the Hapsburgs were since you’ve never studied history).

Third time asking you what you accept as "proof". Still wont answer...

There’s a lot of foolish historical claims on the Coli, such as claiming African-Americans are indigenous to the Americas. Your claim is just as silly.

Till you explain what constitutes proof, it has to be just as foolish as saying white people are indigenous to the Europe. Or someone other than black people are indigenous to America. Your claim that all black people come from Africa is silly as well.

I’m fact, you belittle black scholarship on the African diaspora

I belittle people like you who want to limit the black experience to Africa and Africa alone...

Still waiting on proof from you

You havent defined what you accept as proof. Lets see what deflection from that comes out next

 

[///Vega+++]

cac show
reason why I never bothered watching any of it
nikkaz are mad confused

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

Proof?


Third time asking you what you accept as "proof". Still wont answer...



Till you explain what constitutes proof, it has to be just as foolish as saying white people are indigenous to the Europe. Or someone other than black people are indigenous to America. Your claim that all black people come from Africa is silly as well.



I belittle people like you who want to limit the black experience to Africa and Africa alone...



You havent defined what you accept as proof. Lets see what deflection from that comes out next

If you don't know what proof or evidence to back up your claims are, then if you've exhibited your stupidity to the world. It's not up to tell you what proof is. You must simply provide. Failure to do so shows that you are a liar.

Show me demonstrable, clear evidence that the Hapsburgs were Africans. You can't do it which is why you're deflecting and continuing to lie.

Here's the British Broadcasting Corporation reporting on Indian rulers of African origin, using testimony from ACTUAL SCHOLARS and not high school dropouts posting on the Coli:
Africans in India: From slaves to reformers and rulers

This painting shows Nawab Sidi Haidar Khan of Sachin. The African-ruled state of Sachin was established in 1791 in Gujarat. It had its own cavalry and a state band that included Africans, its own coats of arms, currency, and stamped paper. In 1948, when the princely states were incorporated into independent India and ceased to exist, Sachin had a population of 26,000 - 85% Hindu and 13% Muslim - explains Dr Diouf.

Here is a newspaper article from one of the largest newspapers in India on Indian kings of African origin:
‘Travelling tempo’ to exhibit ancestry of Siddis in India

Here's a Google Scholar link to academic articles about African ruling in India (you'll find many academic papers on this subject that have been peer reviewed):
Google Scholar

Thus, I've disproved your lie that I don't believe Africans could have ruled outside of Africa. They did. They weren't Hapsburgs though


How come you don't believe black people come from Africa?

 

[Everythingg]

If you don't know what proof or evidence to back up your claims are, then if you've exhibited your stupidity to the world. It's not up to tell you what proof is. You must simply provide. Failure to do so shows that you are a liar.

Show me demonstrable, clear evidence that the Hapsburgs were Africans. You can't do it which is why you're deflecting and continuing to lie.

Here's the British Broadcasting Corporation reporting on Indian rulers of African origin, using testimony from ACTUAL SCHOLARS and not high school dropouts posting on the Coli:
Africans in India: From slaves to reformers and rulers

By "actual scholars" you mean cacs huh?

So by "proof" you mean a cac that went to a cac accredited college saying something? Or one that has some cac accredited title? I mean what from the link are you accepting as proof other than you trusting who's saying it?

Here is a newspaper article from one of the largest newspapers in India on Indian kings of African origin:
‘Travelling tempo’ to exhibit ancestry of Siddis in India

Here's a Google Scholar link to academic articles about African ruling in India (you'll find many academic papers on this subject that have been peer reviewed):
Google Scholar

So its true because cacs come together and say its true? Its true because people come together and say its true? Because Im not seeing what you're seeing that they present, that constitutes as proof. If its not statues, if its not pictures, if its not the words of people who were there at the time, what exactly are you accepting as proof of anything? You still ducking...

Thus, I've disproved your lie that I don't believe Africans could have ruled outside of Africa. They did. They weren't Hapsburgs though

I didnt say Africans. Because when you call them Africans, you present them as migrators to a foreign land that they then conquered from the indigenous of that land. Heres how the people of Peru presented Charles V of Europe, who was also a Habsburg:

Spoiler

This is a list of Incan kings and in the second row, last picture, you can see a black guy holding a book with a cross on it. That is Charles V of Europe. So again, if pictures and statues dont constitute proof, are you saying that its cacs/people accredited by cac institutions that constitute proof as to what happened in the past? Duck duck goose ass nikka

How come you don't believe black people come from Africa?

I said all black people do not come from Africa.

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

By "actual scholars" you mean cacs huh?

So by "proof" you mean a cac that went to a cac accredited college saying something? Or one that has some cac accredited title? I mean what from the link are you accepting as proof other than you trusting who's saying it?




So its true because cacs come together and say its true? Its true because people come together and say its true? Because Im not seeing what you're seeing that they present, that constitutes as proof. If its not statues, if its not pictures, if its not the words of people who were there at the time, what exactly are you accepting as proof of anything? You still ducking...



I didnt say Africans. Because when you call them Africans, you present them as migrators to a foreign land that they then conquered from the indigenous of that land. Heres how the people of Peru presented Charles V of Europe, who was also a Habsburg:

Spoiler

This is a list of Incan kings and in the second row, last picture, you can see a black guy holding a book with a cross on it. That is Charles V of Europe. So again, if pictures and statues dont constitute proof, are you saying that its cacs/people accredited by cac institutions that constitute proof as to what happened in the past? Duck duck goose ass nikka



I said all black people do not come from Africa.

So you think all accredited scholars are cacs? You don't think that there are black people studying their own history and writing papers. That's a lot of self-directed anti-blackness and the deflection is hilarious

Charles V (painted when he was alive). You have to accept this painting as proof because there's no difference between this painting and the statue and paintings you've presented:

The painting you showed is damaged. The Inka look too dark-skinned. The modern descendants of the Inka in Peru (the Quechua) don't even look like that dark.

But lemme guess - you think the Inka are black


Since you've asked me so much about proof, I'll ask for the type of evidence I'm looking for. Before, I was going easy on you. Now you have to provide me peer-reviewed academic evidence which demonstrates that the Hapsburg dynasty of Europe were black Africans.



You'll likely continue to lie and deflect, as is the nature of men who crawls on their belly like snakes.

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

Another painting of Charles V from 1519, when he was 19 years old. He looks like Wesley Snipes! :

 

[Everythingg]

So you think all accredited scholars are cacs? You don't think that there are black people studying their own history and writing papers. That's a lot of self-directed anti-blackness and the deflection is hilarious

Your acceptance or denial of truth is based on who said it and not the credence of what they're saying or not. So to you, if cacs or people from cac accredited organizations say it, its true. If they dont, its not. And then you turn around and pretend as if you're pro black

Charles V (painted when he was alive). You have to accept this painting as proof because there's no difference between this painting and the statue and paintings you've presented:

Thats my drip breh, get your own

First you was a duck duck goose ass nikka. Now you're a follow in another man's footsteps ass nikka. Im asking YOU, if YOU do not accept pictures, statues, and the word of people who were there at the time, then what do you accept?

The painting you showed is damaged. The Inka look too dark-skinned. The modern descendants of the Inka in Peru (the Quechua) don't even look like that dark.

Ala Daum: "That picture is damaged!! They're too dark
Ala Daum: "Here are the real original Egyptians!!!

Heres a black Peruvian:

But no, the people who actually match the pictures cant be them because everybody that looks like them is African. So the consensus is that the pictures are damaged and made them look that dark while leaving the white kings at the bottom that happened to be from Europe (oh except Charles 5) as "white"..

Since you've asked me so much about proof, I'll ask for the type of evidence I'm looking for. Before, I was going easy on you. Now you have to provide me peer-reviewed academic evidence which demonstrates that the Hapsburg dynasty of Europe were black Africans.



You'll likely continue to lie and deflect, as is the nature of men who crawls on their belly like snakes.

"I need the white man or his organizations to tell me history before I believe it" ass nikka