Are clowns suppose to be black people?

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
So I appreciate your contribution to the thread but you are acting like "the inception of the clown" is the end all be all of "the current day iteration"

Sure...Clowne and all that other stuff that you linked to is important, but things change meaning all the time. Just because something can be traced to something does not mean that the powers that be haven't altered it so that it now has a different meaning.

I'm definitely not the most "woke" person on the coli but if you can't see that mannerisms, style of dress, etc. from clowns today and in the recent lexicon (in America) bears strong roots to racist themes from the early 1900s then you are either trolling or just not really thinking very analytically.

Big wide red smiles
Curly Afros
Jumping around
big noses
acting dumb (not silly...but actually aloof)
etc.

are all tied to minstrel shows and the white viewpoint on black people in the early 1900s
Thank you for this logical post.
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,126
Reputation
-3,314
Daps
83,526
So I appreciate your contribution to the thread but you are acting like "the inception of the clown" is the end all be all of "the current day iteration"

Sure...Clowne and all that other stuff that you linked to is important, but things change meaning all the time. Just because something can be traced to something does not mean that the powers that be haven't altered it so that it now has a different meaning.

I'm definitely not the most "woke" person on the coli but if you can't see that mannerisms, style of dress, etc. from clowns today and in the recent lexicon (in America) bears strong roots to racist themes from the early 1900s then you are either trolling or just not really thinking very analytically.

Big wide red smiles
Curly Afros
Jumping around
big noses
acting dumb (not silly...but actually aloof)
etc.

are all tied to minstrel shows and the white viewpoint on black people in the early 1900s

So facts don't line up with your worldview, so you look for something beyond the facts.
I got you.
SMMH
 

Oceanicpuppy

Superstar
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
12,044
Reputation
2,350
Daps
35,924
image.png
image.png
Read the second one first. If you don't think Scottish moors means "black" I have some stuff from my textbook that will question that as well it's an entire section on Spanish theatre and their portrayal of moors that spans to the new world. :umad:
 
Last edited:

TL15

Veteran
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
16,655
Reputation
13,713
Daps
136,031
So facts don't line up with your worldview, so you look for something beyond the facts.
I got you.
SMMH


I acknowledged your contribution to the thread but said that things have changed (which is a fact) from their inception.

Dr. Naismith was using baskets for basketball... is the hoop STILL made of wicker? :jbhmm:

Things evolve.

So YES you brought some very valid factual contributions to the thread. Very valid historical data. There is your pat on the back. However, just because something started as one thing, does not mean that the meaning over time remains the same. Understand that time shapes many things; words, definitions, icons, etc. are malleable. You are speaking as though "Clown was founded in Europe with no thought of black people" is a set rule, but things change.

A great example of the malleability of language, culture, etc. is the word "nice". Nice used to mean "very simple or foolish" and now, hundreds of years later, that connotation is not tied to the word. Why? Because things change within context.

So either you are being very obtuse with your rationale , trolling, stubborn, or something else, but most logical people can agree that most things do not exist solely and distinctly from the roots of their definition. I can acknowledge that clowns may not have started as a trope to disrespect black people, but that does not mean that they have not morphed into something different than their original intention.

So you are right...I look "beyond the facts" and apply logic, experience, the naked eye, connotation, into my worldview....
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,126
Reputation
-3,314
Daps
83,526
How in the hell can any academic worth a damn type out that portraying african-americans dates to the middle ages?
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,126
Reputation
-3,314
Daps
83,526
I acknowledged your contribution to the thread but said that things have changed (which is a fact) from their inception.

Dr. Naismith was using baskets for basketball... is the hoop STILL made of wicker? :jbhmm:

Things evolve.

So YES you brought some very valid factual contributions to the thread. Very valid historical data. There is your pat on the back. However, just because something started as one thing, does not mean that the meaning over time remains the same. Understand that time shapes many things; words, definitions, icons, etc. are malleable. You are speaking as though "Clown was founded in Europe with no thought of black people" is a set rule, but things change.

A great example of the malleability of language, culture, etc. is the word "nice". Nice used to mean "very simple or foolish" and now, hundreds of years later, that connotation is not tied to the word. Why? Because things change within context.

So either you are being very obtuse with your rationale , trolling, stubborn, or something else, but most logical people can agree that most things do not exist solely and distinctly from the roots of their definition. I can acknowledge that clowns may not have started as a trope to disrespect black people, but that does not mean that they have not morphed into something different than their original intention.

So you are right...I look "beyond the facts" and apply logic, experience, the naked eye, connotation, into my worldview....


Like I said there is no logic are fact behind your contention.
The facts don't back you up, so you appeal to emotion or a "truth" beyond "facts"
Its okay, I see what you are trying to do, nothing left to discuss.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
I acknowledged your contribution to the thread but said that things have changed (which is a fact) from their inception.

Dr. Naismith was using baskets for basketball... is the hoop STILL made of wicker? :jbhmm:

Things evolve.

So YES you brought some very valid factual contributions to the thread. Very valid historical data. There is your pat on the back. However, just because something started as one thing, does not mean that the meaning over time remains the same. Understand that time shapes many things; words, definitions, icons, etc. are malleable. You are speaking as though "Clown was founded in Europe with no thought of black people" is a set rule, but things change.

A great example of the malleability of language, culture, etc. is the word "nice". Nice used to mean "very simple or foolish" and now, hundreds of years later, that connotation is not tied to the word. Why? Because things change within context.

So either you are being very obtuse with your rationale , trolling, stubborn, or something else, but most logical people can agree that most things do not exist solely and distinctly from the roots of their definition. I can acknowledge that clowns may not have started as a trope to disrespect black people, but that does not mean that they have not morphed into something different than their original intention.

So you are right...I look "beyond the facts" and apply logic, experience, the naked eye, connotation, into my worldview....
He is very biased so he will be purposely obtuse and illogical to "win" and gaslight you instead of trying to pursue the truth.

Thats one thing I got from him based on our interactions.

That and he seems to have some kind of agenda.
 

Oceanicpuppy

Superstar
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
12,044
Reputation
2,350
Daps
35,924
How in the hell can any academic worth a damn type out that portraying african-americans dates to the middle ages?
There were black people in Europe. Not African Americans. He means blacking the face to look like black people.
 

TL15

Veteran
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
16,655
Reputation
13,713
Daps
136,031
Like I said there is no logic are fact behind your contention.
The facts don't back you up, so you appeal to emotion or a "truth" beyond "facts"
Its okay, I see what you are trying to do, nothing left to discuss.

All good breh...clearly we think differently. I think analytically and you like to do research :yeshrug:


full
 
Top