Arabic Wikipedia Entry on Hitler = Interesting

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,621
Reputation
8,738
Daps
101,061
Why would people posting on the Internet need help reading? It's not an entire novel. Not even close.​


Because there are many old posters here who dont know how to use the internet outside of porn and youtube.


Also,welcome to History 101:mjlol:

Is this any different than how they teach black history in school? The arabic version is actually more accurate. Because with all the documentaries and memoribillia sold,Obviously Hitler isnt believed to be pure evil by all. Many think hes a piece of human filth,many think hes a great man . That was basically the jist of the article. Im guessing the American version pretends everyone hates Hitler to cover the truth? Which is that white people loooove them some Hitler:respect:
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
19,027
Reputation
4,495
Daps
79,640
Reppin
North Jersey
So a man that forced his way into power, believed non whites were subhumans, was inspired by Jim Crow, killed his political rivals and allies, started a war that killed tens of millions of people, then started an extermination program of millions of people including Jews, is not bad? WTF?

What is the "objective" version of Hitler's morality that you want to be displayed?
No need to twist my words, I wrote what I wrote.

I literally called the man evil. I referred to his actions a genocide. I don't know further to condemn an human being than that.

My point is, most people's opinions of Hitler begin and end on him being evil. There's nothing about the word evil. I could call the Founding Fathers good/evil and that tells me almost nothing about those people, their motivations or their significance.

Being objective about someone or something you fundamentally disagree with is extremely difficult for most people and it shoes. Sometimes you need a different perspectives to see the whole picture, or come close. It doesn't mean those different perspectives are right. They just are. There's nothing wrong with, especially if they aren't lying.
 

num123

Speak like a child
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
6,746
Reputation
1,778
Daps
27,359
Reppin
Bay Area/Chicago
No need to twist my words, I wrote what I wrote.

I literally called the man evil. I referred to his actions a genocide. I don't know further to condemn an human being than that.

My point is, most people's opinions of Hitler begin and end on him being evil. There's nothing about the word evil. I could call the Founding Fathers good/evil and that tells me almost nothing about those people, their motivations or their significance.

Being objective about someone or something you fundamentally disagree with is extremely difficult for most people and it shoes. Sometimes you need a different perspectives to see the whole picture, or come close. It doesn't mean those different perspectives are right. They just are. There's nothing wrong with, especially if they aren't lying.
So what, should we talk about his love of making shytty art? Being a dog lover? That one time in grade school he gave his teacher an apple? What else should be talked about other than him being one of the worst people ever to live?
 

Gains

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
10,209
Reputation
1,140
Daps
22,376
Because there are many old posters here who dont know how to use the internet outside of porn and youtube.


Also,welcome to History 101:mjlol:

Is this any different than how they teach black history in school? The arabic version is actually more accurate. Because with all the documentaries and memoribillia sold,Obviously Hitler isnt believed to be pure evil by all. Many think hes a piece of human filth,many think hes a great man . That was basically the jist of the article. Im guessing the American version pretends everyone hates Hitler to cover the truth? Which is that white people loooove them some Hitler:respect:

Before WW2 Americans loved them some Hitler
 
Top