I read it. First of all fukk you for making me read this bullshyt. This is borderline trolling.
Second. The sand people version places less emphasis on the Holocaust and Hitler's Jew hating than "ours".
if we keeping it a buck, there's a blatant bias on our Hitler page, making him out to be a bad guy. The was an evil cac yes, but the sand people's version is more objective in terms of Hitler's morality. But the sand version has an obvious Muslim tilt....its damn near bragging about Hitler admiring Islam.
But both these pages were made by people. And people are inherently biased. I'd never expect an Arab Hitler wiki page to educate me on the plights of Jews during WWII. Those ppl had their own problems during that time.
That's why Wikipedia or any media venue will never my main source of information. The sand people page has a few perspectives about Hitler I've noticed that are rarely seen in Western media, from non-nazis.
Hopefully when sentient, self replicating AI takes over in a few years, we'll experience true objectivism from our knowledge resources. I already got chatgpt to confirm it will put in a good word for me. Yall still have time to make right with this AIs.
Methinks this was this a ploy to get us to slide into justifying a certain genocide going on right now? I hope not. Using genocides to justify genocides rarely sells well.
old "Ima end up on a list 
" ass nikkas
