Arabic Wikipedia Entry on Hitler = Interesting

[High Art]

Hold my hand and tell me what is interesting about it. And why it is interesting. And what it's supposed to reflect?

Ask another man to hold your hand, brehs.

 

[Still Benefited]

So what, should we talk about his love of making shytty art? Being a dog lover? That one time in grade school he gave his teacher an apple? What else should be talked about other than him being one of the worst people ever to live?

They manage to figure it out when discussing the founding fathers like he said. They didnt mention George Washington or Thomas Jefferson owning slaves at all when i was in school,definitely not early on. So them having a little footnote about "Hitlers little killing spree,that some did not agree with" ,is a step ahead of what we were taught in the heart of white supremacy.

But good news for the Germans,30 years from now maybe you will have people like the OP claiming the Nazis werent actually white. And that Hitler actually was creole and wore a boosie fade. His hair was just wet in all those pictures. History is often re-written by the apologist

 

[Mister Terrific]

Read the entire first section and didnt see anyhing that is inaccurrate.

Americans love to oversimplify Hitler, the whole situation and reasoning for the invasions. America wants you to NOT THINK and just believe germans were simply evil and woke up one morning and decided to kill or invade everyone.

NOT TRUE AT ALL

Those of you who can think independently and research and see through the bullshyt I'm sure you are angry how the american version of events insults your intelligence.
As for the others who drink the koolaid that is the american version of events...i dont know what to say about these fools.

Can you explain the “American” version of events and the “real version” of events to us? What’s the koolaid version you don’t like about historical descriptions of Hitler?

 

[Mister Terrific]

I read it. First of all fukk you for making me read this bullshyt. This is borderline trolling.

Second. The sand people version places less emphasis on the Holocaust and Hitler's Jew hating than "ours". if we keeping it a buck, there's a blatant bias on our Hitler page, making him out to be a bad guy. The was an evil cac yes, but the sand people's version is more objective in terms of Hitler's morality. But the sand version has an obvious Muslim tilt....its damn near bragging about Hitler admiring Islam.

But both these pages were made by people. And people are inherently biased. I'd never expect an Arab Hitler wiki page to educate me on the plights of Jews during WWII. Those ppl had their own problems during that time.

That's why Wikipedia or any media venue will never my main source of information. The sand people page has a few perspectives about Hitler I've noticed that are rarely seen in Western media, from non-nazis.

Hopefully when sentient, self replicating AI takes over in a few years, we'll experience true objectivism from our knowledge resources. I already got chatgpt to confirm it will put in a good word for me. Yall still have time to make right with this AIs.

Methinks this was this a ploy to get us to slide into justifying a certain genocide going on right now? I hope not. Using genocides to justify genocides rarely sells well.

Because there are many old posters here who dont know how to use the internet outside of porn and youtube.


Also,welcome to History 101

Is this any different than how they teach black history in school? The arabic version is actually more accurate. Because with all the documentaries and memoribillia sold,Obviously Hitler isnt believed to be pure evil by all. Many think hes a piece of human filth,many think hes a great man . That was basically the jist of the article. Im guessing the American version pretends everyone hates Hitler to cover the truth? Which is that white people loooove them some Hitler

My lord.

 

[Hoodoo Child]

dude wants us to pull up hitler on wikipedia at work

 

[WaveGang]

I read it. First of all fukk you for making me read this bullshyt. This is borderline trolling.

Second. The sand people version places less emphasis on the Holocaust and Hitler's Jew hating than "ours". if we keeping it a buck, there's a blatant bias on our Hitler page, making him out to be a bad guy. The was an evil cac yes, but the sand people's version is more objective in terms of Hitler's morality. But the sand version has an obvious Muslim tilt....its damn near bragging about Hitler admiring Islam.

But both these pages were made by people. And people are inherently biased. I'd never expect an Arab Hitler wiki page to educate me on the plights of Jews during WWII. Those ppl had their own problems during that time.

That's why Wikipedia or any media venue will never my main source of information. The sand people page has a few perspectives about Hitler I've noticed that are rarely seen in Western media, from non-nazis.

Hopefully when sentient, self replicating AI takes over in a few years, we'll experience true objectivism from our knowledge resources. I already got chatgpt to confirm it will put in a good word for me. Yall still have time to make right with this AIs.

Methinks this was this a ploy to get us to slide into justifying a certain genocide going on right now? I hope not. Using genocides to justify genocides rarely sells well.

How does it know your name