Anyone Seen Django?

Rapmastermind

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
10,673
Reputation
3,338
Daps
39,626
Reppin
New York City
DJANGO GETS 5 OSCAR NOMINATIONS. NO LEO, JAMIE, KERRY OR SAM:


BEST PICTURE
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR CHRISTOPH WALTZ
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY QT
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
BEST SOUND EDITING
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
27,293
Reputation
2,520
Daps
64,996
Reppin
NULL
DJANGO GETS 5 OSCAR NOMINATIONS. NO LEO, JAMIE, KERRY OR SAM:


BEST PICTURE
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR CHRISTOPH WALTZ
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY QT
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
BEST SOUND EDITING

The cinematography was :bow:

If not anything else I think it should win that award
Should win sound editing, too



Also I forgot that Reginald Hudlin was apart of Django. He pissed white folks off with Black Panther, and blacks folks off with Django LOL
 

Calmye

Cali born Cali bred
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
17,133
Reputation
-4,770
Daps
33,996
Reppin
So. Cal
Ok where's the bald and starving Holocaust survivor action figures tho?:upsetfavre:

Smh come on dog was a bald starving holocaust survivor a character in the movie? Y'all r fukking reaching

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk 2
 

Malik

Superstar
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
9,848
Reputation
1,765
Daps
27,463
Reppin
DMV | Philly
and I think that flashback is to signify that Schultz finally starts to actually "get it,"--what the whole slavery thing is about, how terrible it is, and that by buying Broomhilda back, even if that means the mission is a success, that he is upholding slavery and the horrors that come with it. In realizing this, he decides that he can't live with himself, so he kills Candie, knowing it means he'll die to.

Basically, he makes the transition from being guilty white liberal whose motives are to distance himself from the "bad" whites, to actually being down for the cause and willing to fight and die for it. I've personally seen, in real life, white liberals experience a great deal of cognitive dissonance as they have gone from speaking out against white supremacy to actually understanding it and realizing that they have benefitted from it and in many ways upheld it. The shift in moral compass is often frightening for them, which is why they are so adamant in NOT talking about issues or telling us to "get over it." They don't wanna talk about it or face it cuz it fukks with their entire self-concept of being a "good" person as they realize how much they benefit by living in a white supremacist society.

The more I think about this movie, the more I believe it is designed to throw the curtains back on white supremacy and is a harsh critique of it. It seems to say, "hey, this is what white people think of you, and this is how they justify it, and it's all STUPID!" or from a white person's perspective, "this is what we think of them and how we treat them, we have been irrational and childish (hence Candie and Candie Land), and it's STUPID because they show more humanity than we do (all the white characters, except Schultz, are actually subhuman and lacking insight/character/intelligence, while all the black characters, even the uncle tom, show insight and humanity). This movie is asking everybody to wake up.

What I'm surprised not too many people have commented on in this thread is how black people are portrayed in this flick and the commentaries made on contemporary black issues--how we think of ourselves and how we are scared of "them" on a psychological level...I think the ending is basically saying that we have no need to be scared, we don't need white people to save us, that we can do it on our own...just that we've been conditioned otherwise.

A1 Posting right here :wow:

I cant even post anything. All yall dudes analyzed the movie from every possible angle. Just goes to show you how cruel slavery was, when a dude who kills for a living is troubled by it.

And that German dude.....that boy can act :wow:
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,604
Daps
67,686
finally watched the flick it was straight :lawd: status.

I think Quentin handled slavery marveously, some of the scenes were legitimately horrifying and disturbing. The dog scene and the whipping scenes in particular.

I was thinking how hard it must've been for Leo to play that role. That character is SO EVIL, it must've been uncomfortable at first.

Christoph Waltz killed it, I was very sad when he died but he went out like a G. I died when he said "I couldn't resist :manny:" after he shot Candie.

Sam Jack had me :deadmanny:

cinematography was better than expected. The soundtrack was SICK.
 

Savior

Superstar
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
4,946
Reputation
1,030
Daps
12,876
Reppin
#byrdgang
Just watched it..dunno how to feel about it. shyt was entertaining. Basically an action movie with slavery as the backdrop. It was hard to take the subject matter seriously cause of all the comedy sprinkled in and the violence was so over the top except when slaves were getting tortured/beat. Maybe that was the point :manny:. Strictly from the action movie standpoint it was entertaining as fukk tho and Leo and Sam Jack killed it. But there wasn't really nothing too deep about it....just basic Tarantino fare hate it or love it
 

Bruce LeRoy

All Star
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
3,220
Reputation
1,120
Daps
10,713
Reppin
NY
Watched it twice.. first time I seen it, I thought it was a good entertaining movie but it took a minute for alot of the things in the film to sink in. The second time watching the movie was much much better.

I was surprised at the sad undercurrent the film had. This is a first for a Tarantino movie.. Jamie Foxx pleading to that sadistic cat with the whip for his wife, the mandingo fighter who doesn't want to fight anymore, The Stephens character etc. The movie's overall tone was a bit more serious than most of Tarantinos other flicks and really most of the scenes that are made to be "funny" are the ones where slavers are killed.

Samuel L's character was funny for about 5 minutes IMO but then you quickly start to see him for this pathetic guy who bullies and intimidates his own people to survive. He's lived his life that way for so long that in the end he actually becomes the person who owned him, but worse.

The action scenes were great... movie was solid overall.
 

JayYoung314

St. Louis Survivor
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,600
Reputation
-630
Daps
2,380
Reppin
Saint Louis
shyt was piff... im a lil sad i aint get 2 see it in theatres like i planned too, to share the experience with the rest of society. Instead i watched it in a dark basement by myself all alone. : (
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,081
Reputation
8,501
Daps
200,182
Reppin
NULL
but wouldnt it make more sense to include bald and starving jews in a movie about the Holocaust/getting revenge on Hitler in the same way he included slavery in a "speghetti western" tho?

or am I too far gone from the realm of logical reasoning?

:leon:

The goal was to kill Nazis, not to help free Jews from concentration camps. So no, it wouldn't have made sense.
 

Spin

All Star
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
1,010
Reputation
390
Daps
2,862
and I think that flashback is to signify that Schultz finally starts to actually "get it,"--what the whole slavery thing is about, how terrible it is, and that by buying Broomhilda back, even if that means the mission is a success, that he is upholding slavery and the horrors that come with it. In realizing this, he decides that he can't live with himself, so he kills Candie, knowing it means he'll die to.

Basically, he makes the transition from being guilty white liberal whose motives are to distance himself from the "bad" whites, to actually being down for the cause and willing to fight and die for it. I've personally seen, in real life, white liberals experience a great deal of cognitive dissonance as they have gone from speaking out against white supremacy to actually understanding it and realizing that they have benefitted from it and in many ways upheld it. The shift in moral compass is often frightening for them, which is why they are so adamant in NOT talking about issues or telling us to "get over it." They don't wanna talk about it or face it cuz it fukks with their entire self-concept of being a "good" person as they realize how much they benefit by living in a white supremacist society.

The more I think about this movie, the more I believe it is designed to throw the curtains back on white supremacy and is a harsh critique of it. It seems to say, "hey, this is what white people think of you, and this is how they justify it, and it's all STUPID!" or from a white person's perspective, "this is what we think of them and how we treat them, we have been irrational and childish (hence Candie and Candie Land), and it's STUPID because they show more humanity than we do (all the white characters, except Schultz, are actually subhuman and lacking insight/character/intelligence, while all the black characters, even the uncle tom, show insight and humanity). This movie is asking everybody to wake up.

What I'm surprised not too many people have commented on in this thread is how black people are portrayed in this flick and the commentaries made on contemporary black issues--how we think of ourselves and how we are scared of "them" on a psychological level...I think the ending is basically saying that we have no need to be scared, we don't need white people to save us, that we can do it on our own...just that we've been conditioned otherwise.


Great Post. Also, I think QT is saying that this whole thing is just a game. Take for instance Schultz being a dentist/bounty hunter. While he obviously wasn't a dentist(at least during the movie), some of the bounty killings were in that gray area as well. When he kills the sheriff in that town they get away because he has a "bounty contract" on the guy. The movie never shows them taking that body in and it could be inferred that he used an old contract to get out of that situation. When the KKK came to surround the wagon, they showed his old contracts being taken out of the tooth prop and replaced with explosives.

There is also the scene when Schultz tells Foxx to pick out a costume/gimmick. He tells him that he must never break character. In life, we're all playing a character. We take it serious that we're a doctor, lawyer, writer, etc, but what does that really mean? It's an illusion that we give power to. Schultz character figures out his niche to play the game. Late in the movie Foxx, having learned the skill, tricks the hillbillies with an old contact to escape being sent to that mining place. He learned the GAME and started to apply it. I even remember someone in the theater at that point saying "he's lying his ass off." Aren't those in "power" doing just the same? The problem is society as a whole goes along with it. I think that's what QT was trying to get across. Break the illusion and play the game.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,604
Daps
67,686
Great Post. Also, I think QT is saying that this whole thing is just a game. Take for instance Schultz being a dentist/bounty hunter. While he obviously wasn't a dentist(at least during the movie), some of the bounty killings were in that gray area as well. When he kills the sheriff in that town they get away because he has a "bounty contract" on the guy. The movie never shows them taking that body in and it could be inferred that he used an old contract to get out of that situation. When the KKK came to surround the wagon, they showed his old contracts being taken out of the tooth prop and replaced with explosives.

There is also the scene when Schultz tells Foxx to pick out a costume/gimmick. He tells him that he must never break character. In life, we're all playing a character. We take it serious that we're a doctor, lawyer, writer, etc, but what does that really mean? It's an illusion that we give power to. Schultz character figures out his niche to play the game. Late in the movie Foxx, having learned the skill, tricks the hillbillies with an old contact to escape being sent to that mining place. He learned the GAME and started to apply it. I even remember someone in the theater at that point saying "he's lying his ass off." Aren't those in "power" doing just the same? The problem is society as a whole goes along with it. I think that's what QT was trying to get across. Break the illusion and play the game.
:whoo:

good analysis, I don't even think about this shyt when I watch a movie yall are on some next level shyt
 
Top