That wasn't Leo's blood on her face
Yes it was.
That wasn't Leo's blood on her face
U sure?
Django Unchained (2012) - Trivia - IMDb
"The scene in which Leonardo DiCaprio's character smashes his hand on the table was done with such force that his hand actually began to bleed. DiCaprio ignored it and continued with the scene. This take was the one used in the film."
Yes it was.
I'm trying to tell yall he shot him because he had the gun up his sleeve and he couldnt shake without revealing the gun, its the only explanation that makes sense!!
This movie was great!
"You gon let this nikka sleep in the big house?"
Tell me why white ppl were mad at my theater
Group of 5 young guys after django blew up the house: "Man I hate this movie "
Two old guys on the exit ramp:
Cac #1 : "What'd you think of the movie Bill? "
Cac Bill: "I'll tel you outside "
stop making shyt up nikka....
A Note on Leonardo DiCaprio, Blood, and Django Unchained (and why Tumblr is gullible)
NO NO NO THAT WASNT LEOS BLOOD WHEN HE SMEARS IT ALL OVER KERRY WASHINGTONS FACE THAT POST DOESNT KNOW WHAT ITS TALKING ABOUT.its only his real blood in the take where he slams his hand down and begins to bleed. the rest of the takes (including the ones with kerry) used fake blood. they didnt just shoot that entire scene in one day or one take! he did the take and went and got stitches and they shot the rest with fake blood.MOVIES DONT WORK THAT WAY.*tarantino may be crazy but i highly doubt he would let his actors rub real bodily fluids all over each other for the sake of cinema.*and this was confirmed at a Q+A i attended with kerry washington and sam.
B-b-b-but white people shouldn't be doing movies about slavery.
I know that you may be talking about something completely different at this point in the thread.
However, in regards to the ridiculous argument that's been going on for a few pages, I only have one thing to say.
Django Unchained...
...is a Western...
...about slavery.
Slavery is not just a side point like the Civil War in The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. It is the focal point of the entire film.
It's a Western about slavery just as Roots is a drama about slavery. Yes, it's a Western just like The Proposition was a Western even though its set in Australia.
So much stupidity on both sides of this argument it's baffling.
Did this movie give an honest interpretation of Lincolns views on black's?
Sent from my Galaxy S3
Actually did it show both sides of his issues with dealing with Slavery. It even showed he had Black Servants in the White House. Again the movie was more from a political standpoint.