Limited? Are those the only two you can use to support your claim? I thought numerous religions attested to it.
And I ruled out those two because: In the Quran Muhammad makes a night Journey to Solomon's Davidic temple, as if its a sacred site. But Solomon means nothing to the Arabs, he's not even a part of their faith system before Muhammad. Anytime Solomons temple is attached to a religion I suspect Zionism is the root of that religion. So thru Muhammad and adopting the Quranic narrative the arabs become connected with Zionism and Solomons Temple. Something they'd previously had not attachment to.
Same with Christianity. Jesus is supposed to be the Messiah of Israel, from the Royal House of David of Judah, and his throne would be in Solomon's Davidic Temple. Thats where Jesus since of authority is derived from. But prior to adopting the Biblical narratives in the Pentateuch-Septuagint the Greco-Romans had no attachment to Jerusalem or a Solomons temple. But thru this new faith and accepting Jesus as their lord and savior they are attached to Solomon's Davidic Temple and Zionism.
Thats is why I rule those 2 out as supporting your claim, because they were manufactured by the same propagandist. And they are both attached to the Davidic-Solomonic Temple which is located on the hill called Zion is Jerusalem. So we can see Zionism are the roots of both manufactured belief systems. I would certainly expect those doctrines to confirm your claims, because their based upon so called Judah-ism. Suddenly Jerusalem is important to these different cultures and they fight wars for control of it. Cmon son
Something I've been playing around with...
thanks for admitting that
