anyone else confused by black christians?

[MBwithadream]

As a matter of fact, I don't attend a church regularly. But as far as my home church growing up, I could not say for sure. Why?

Because if you go back now, you will see what I mean, see back then (hell even now) most either at war, travelin for self (no kids) or just plain do nothing(loner), so women who are more together enivormental & social way, well, basically it this, every woman needs a man who can provide for her, protect her, honor her, & what better man can do that other than a god-fearing man who goes by the commandments of GOD.


Hell, go to a wedding, any weeding you will definitely see more bridesmaids than best man.

 

[NoMayo15]

Because if you go back now, you will see what I mean, see back then (hell even now) most either at war, travelin for self (no kids) or just plain do nothing(loner), so women who are more together enivormental & social way, well, basically it this, every woman needs a man who can provide for her, protect her, honor her, & what better man can do that other than a god-fearing man who goes by the commandments of GOD.


Hell, go to a wedding, any weeding you will definitely see more bridesmaids than grooms.

One, how would I be able to determine any of this by simply asertaining the number of male and female members of the church? Second ... I am offended by your simplistic assessment of women. Basically, you're saying if a women isn't with a god-fearing man (as .. I presume you claim to be) then she is some lost soul. Dude, seriously, go fukk yourself lol. What are you, god's gift to women? And if a woman does decide she wants a man to provide for her, what makes you think those particular rules develop the best characteristics of a mate? Foolishness. And lastly, of course there are going to be more bridesmaids than grooms at any particular wedding. There's only ever ONE groom... unless you're in Utah and there's some kinda of weird polygamy thing goin on. But even if you mean something else, what difference does it make? The only conclusion you can draw from routinely seeing more women than men at a wedding is that women attend weddings more than men.

 

[MBwithadream]

One, how would I be able to determine any of this by simply asertaining the number of male and female members of the church? Second ... I am offended by your simplistic assessment of women. Basically, you're saying if a women isn't with a god-fearing man (as .. I presume you claim to be) then she is some lost soul. Dude, seriously, go fukk yourself lol. What are you, god's gift to women? And if a woman does decide she wants a man to provide for her, what makes you think those particular rules develop the best characteristics of a mate? Foolishness. And lastly, of course there are going to be more bridesmaids than grooms at any particular wedding. There's only ever ONE groom... unless you're in Utah and there's some kinda of weird polygamy thing goin on. But even if you mean something else, what difference does it make? The only conclusion you can draw from routinely seeing more women than men at a wedding is that women attend weddings more than men.

I meant best man. not groom. but I see you already quick to remind me of that.

Women are naturally drawn to power & status. They also like bad boys. Some bad guys like women, but some treat them like a big booty hoe (2Chainz Song). If really want know all the of what women wants are go talk to my friend HisexcellenceReincar.


I have yet to have a woman.

 

[NoMayo15]

I meant best man. not groom. but I see you already quick to remind me of that.

Women are naturally drawn to power & status. They also like bad boys. Some bad guys like women, but some treat them like a big booty hoe (2Chainz Song). If really want know all the of what women wants are go talk to my friend HisexcellenceReincar.


I have yet to have a woman.

This all you had to say. Were you abused as a child? Scared to smile, they call you ugly?

 

[MBwithadream]

This all you had to say. Were you abused as a child? Scared to smile, they call you ugly?

I don't eat p*ssy.

*smugCena*

& broke.

used to simp too if you want to know.

 

[Blackking]

I have yet to have a woman.

What does this mean? lol, what does that sh1t mean, r u a grown man?

 

[NoMayo15]

I don't eat p*ssy.

*smugCena*

& broke.

used to simp too if you want to know.

 

[MBwithadream]

What does this mean? lol, what does that sh1t mean, r u a grown man?

I haven't been coatin with no women.

I could have if I was a little mischievous but nah, I never that nikka to just anyone's p*ssy.

 

[Blackking]

I haven't been coatin with no women.

I could have if I was a little mischievous but nah, I never that nikka to just anyone's p*ssy.

U don't need to have money. U don't need to eat p*ssy, even though u are wack for that sh1t.

Just hang out with a friend u gets alot, and u'll learn. Or find a young chick, maybe even a church girl.... 18-21 and naive. If that doesn't work, pay for some. If u are too Black Christian to pay for it, then get ur paper and presence up. If ur fat - get funny. If ur ugly- get money. If ur lame, there are plenty of lame chicks. Either way, why would u want to go on like that? You're just not trying. If you were in Detroit and I knew u, u would be hittin something real nice in under 2 weeks.

 

[MBwithadream]

U don't need to have money. U don't need to eat p*ssy, even though u are wack for that sh1t.

Just hang out with a friend u gets alot, and u'll learn. Or find a young chick, maybe even a church girl.... 18-21 and naive. If that doesn't work, pay for some. If u are too Black Christian to pay for it, then get ur paper and presence up. If ur fat - get funny. If ur ugly- get money. If ur lame, there are plenty of lame chicks. Either way, why would u want to go on like that? You're just not trying. If you were in Detroit and I knew u, u would be hittin something real nice in under 2 weeks.

I babysit a niece & sometimes a grandma. I got obligations to my family, although I think I need to go out.

 

[Blackking]

I babysit a niece & sometimes a grandma. I got obligations to my family, although I think I need to go out.

well I don't pay for it... but maybe u should. if ur against that, then don't go to the club. join something. A class, a group, a job. Hit a chick that u sorta know.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

The same reason why there are few secular blacks now ... at least vocal secular blacks. Religion is a great clutch for the disenfranchised, impoverished and uneducated. Not to mention the social stigma with not being a member of one of the Abrahamic religions.

Sure, maybe religion was a motivator for slave uprisings ... it's very easy to motivate someone to fight another if they believe god is on their side. But suppose those slave owners never taught blacks their religion, or if slaves didn't have a religion. Does that mean slavery would still be going on today? Does that mean Nat Turner, and Frederick Douglass and all these people who fought for emancipation would have instead stayed silent? I don't know, it's hard to say. I'd like to think that even if the events were different, reason would eventually emerge, and the majority of Americans would view slavery and later Jim Crow, as the despicable institution we view it today.

Surely you jest with this comment....

Of course negroes are exponentially more secular now. It's all about action not title.

Look at how nikkas cater to their base nature with sex, drugs, and violence,

Look at how black men abandon/ignore their offspring at an alarming rate...

Look at how sisters give up their womb to any fitting stereotype and then turn their womb into a tomb when they realize that said child will be more of a hinderance to their lifestyle than a blessing.

Is this not secular behavior? Isn't this behavior more rampant now than it was between 1945-68?

Weren't black families communities and families more rock solid back then?

Isn't that the era that produced our greatest social leaders of all times????

Blacks back then were willing to die for their faith and what they believed in.
Negroes were willing to make the ultimate sacrifice back then, but what will a nikka sacrifice now for the betterment of his/her race?

I'll wait on that answer..

People who are willing to pay the ultimate price(their life) for what they believe in are beyond reproach. That is the type of spirit that the black church instilled in the civil rights movement and it was GOD's energy in its purest form...

Would you sacrifice/risk your life for your fellow brother or sister?

And your passive aggressive sentiment as to who clings to religion is insulting....

Key words like uneducated, impoverished, etc...The biggest and most powerful institution in the world, (the Vatican) is the antithesis of your adjectives.

But you want to come on here and convince us that believing in GOD is solely for the bottom percentile of the population and hasn't benefited us anything.

 

[NoMayo15]

Is this not secular behavior? Isn't this behavior more rampant now than it was between 1945-68? Weren't black families communities and families more rock solid back then? Isn't that the era that produced our greatest social leaders of all times????

To be honest, I don't know if these actions are more prevalent now, but I would be interested to see some figures on it. I suspect it might have increased, as black culture is vastly different than what it once was. But let's keep in mind, within the black community, still about 90% of people are absolutely certain that god exists. Within that group consists of adulterers, drug-addicts, and criminals. So let's not pretend it's just non-believers that are doing these things. As a matter of fact, those that don't believe tend to be more educated, and tend to stay out of prison. And it's for this very reason that I can say that the rise in non-belief in the past few decades is not a cause of any perceived decline in moral fiber. Correlation not causation.

Also, these acts aren't advocated by humanism or any kind of secular morality. The notion that since most religions view them as unacceptable, that they are therefore secular is ridiculous.

Blacks back then were willing to die for their faith and what they believed in.
Negroes were willing to make the ultimate sacrifice back then, but what will a nikka sacrifice now for the betterment of his/her race?

I'll wait on that answer..

Kind of a retarded question. If we lived in similar circumstances as blacks did during the Jim Crow era, I'd gladly give up my life if it meant the quality of life would greatly improve for everyone else. But we don't live in that era, and it's not exactly a fair question.

People who are willing to pay the ultimate price(their life) for what they believe in are beyond reproach. That is the type of spirit that the black church instilled in the civil rights movement and it was GOD's energy in its purest form...

Would you sacrifice/risk your life for your fellow brother or sister?

Yes.

And your passive aggressive sentiment as to who clings to religion is insulting....

Key words like uneducated, impoverished, etc...The biggest and most powerful institution in the world, (the Vatican) is the antithesis of your adjectives.

But you want to come on here and convince us that believing in GOD is solely for the bottom percentile of the population and hasn't benefited us anything.

Sorry if it's insulting, but ... I mean ... it's also the truth. When I say it's a great clutch for those people, I don't mean to say that only the poorest and dumbest believe. My point is people hope these things are true because it makes them feel better. Most people are uncomfortable with not knowing. It's scary not knowing what happens when you die, and it's comforting to think there's some sort of cosmic justice in the world. If you're living a crappy life, then it's comforting to know that you might have a better go at it in the next life. But the fact of the matter is none of these ideas are supported by fact.

The Vatican is powerful, and it is wealthy, this is true. But it's also the quintessential institution of willful ignorance. Throughout many times in history, it has fought tooth and nail to suppress humanity's best method to determine what is true and false about the universe.