Nuremberg Laws were inspired by Jim Crow. Nazi Pow in Texas were shocked how Blacks were treated. Roosevelt also refused to meet Jesse Owens after he won gold medal yet he was met by Hitler.
Hitler didn’t meet Owens...wtf
Nuremberg Laws were inspired by Jim Crow. Nazi Pow in Texas were shocked how Blacks were treated. Roosevelt also refused to meet Jesse Owens after he won gold medal yet he was met by Hitler.
Yes, there's lots of construction work right now, but you don't get the point. If you want a stable income, if you raising a family, they you can't just go without work for 3-4 years at a time.Then NYC must be the exception then, bc we're steady building. There are cranes all over the city. Rn in Harlem, they're buying churches and turning them into residential bldgs. You know how many churches there are in Harlem?! At least two on every city block. All being negotiated on, purchased, and developed. Right now.
There's plenty of work, but only if you're not locked out. Don't know what you're talking about. Yes, there was a lull after 2008, but it picked right back up.
There's no such thing as "impartial" sources. What you can do, at least, is remove sources which have giant, determinative biases that have nothing to do with the issue at hand. I don't believe racist organizations when they present information on race. Full stop. It's over before it's started.Sources? I won't be accepting as legitimate any sources from globalists or their neoliberal minions, both groups having expressed 'no borders' sentiments in the recent past. Obviously, they'd have as much of an agenda as the right wingers. We need completely impartial sources, right?
Sources? I won't be accepting as legitimate any sources from globalists or their neoliberal minions, both groups having expressed 'no borders' sentiments in the recent past. Obviously, they'd have as much of an agenda as the right wingers. We need completely impartial sources, right?
Considering the inflow of immigrants by age, schooling and location I evaluate their impact in local markets (cities and states) assuming no mobility of natives and on the US market as a whole allowing for native internal mobility. Our findings show that for all plausible parameter values there is essentially no effect of immigration on native poverty at the national level. At the local level, only considering the most extreme estimates and only in some localities, we find non-trivial effects of immigration on poverty. In general, however, even the local effects of immigration bear very little correlation with the observed changes in poverty rates and they explain a negligible fraction of them.
The simulation results by race and ethnicity suggest that immigration over this time period has had negligible effects on poverty overall. By level of educational attainment, we found the largest potential effects on the poverty rates of households headed by someone with less than a high school degree. The simulations suggest a hypothetical 2005 poverty rate (if the immigrant population had remained at 1970 levels) between 0.5 and 1.9 percentage points lower than the actual poverty rate. Again, this is a relatively small impact. For households headed by a native-born person with a high school degree or greater (the overwhelming majority of U.S. households), the effects of immigration on poverty are essentially equal to zero.
Poverty simulation results for households defined by both the race and educational attainment level of the household head, shown in Figure 5, lead to very similar conclusions.8 Again, the lowest simulated poverty rates imply only modest impacts of labor market competition with immigrants on native poverty rates for households headed by someone with less than a high school degree and virtually no effects for all other groups. For the lowest-skilled households, the largest poverty effects occur for African Americans and Hispanics. For example, the lowest simulated poverty rate (again, if the immigrant population had been held to 1970 levels) for black households headed by someone with less than a high school degree is 43 percent, 2 percentage points lower than the actual poverty rate for this group in 2005 (45 percent). The comparable figures for lowskilled Hispanic households are 34 percent and 37 percent.
We find little evidence of an effect of immigration on native poverty through immigrant-native labor market competition. Despite adverse wage effects on high school dropouts and relatively small effects on the poverty rates of members of this group, the effects on native poverty rates are negligible, primarily because most native-born poor households have at least one working adult with at least a high school education.
The documented wage elasticities are small and clustered near zero. Dustmann et al. (2008) likewise found very little evidence for wage effects in their review of the UK experience. This parallels an earlier conclusion by Friedberg and Hunt (1995) that immigration had little impact on native wages; overall, their survey of the earlier literature found that a 10% increase in the immigrant share of the labor force reduced native wages by about 1%. Recent meta-surveys by Longhi et al. (2005, 2008) and Okkerse (2008) found comparable, small effects across many studies. This consistent finding of small effects has led to many additional efforts to understand its origin. Several studies assess whether endogenous location decisions by immigrants weaken displacement. One strand uses natural experiments of major, exogenous immigration waves to a region: the Card (1990) study of the 1980 Mariel boatlift from Cuba to Miami, the Hunt (1992) study of the 1962 repatriation of European-origin Algerians to France upon Algeriaís independence, and the Friedberg (2001) study of Russian Jewish immigration to Israel in 1990- 2004. These studies found very weak effects after these events despite increases of up to 10% of the local labor force. These types of studies are generally credible, especially if they can demonstrate external validity of results. A second strand uses an interaction of past immigrant stocks and migration trends to instrument for observed local changes.13 These estimations again Önd comparable results.
The probability that immigrants increase unemployment is low in the short run and zero in the long run. Most area analyses and time-series analyses fail to find a significant influence of immigration on (un)employment probabilities. See for instance the findings of Gang et al. (1999) and Shan et al. (1999) for the EU and of Simon et al. (1993) and Marr and Siklos (1994) for the USA and Canada. Nevertheless, some studies do find an increase in unemployment rate (Winegarden and Khor, 1991), unemployment frequency (Winkelmann and Zimmermann, 1993) and unemployment duration (Winter-Ebmer and Zweim¨uller, 2000). Both area analysis and time-series analysis produce reasons to believe that if there is an employment effect it will especially hit the unemployed (Winter-Ebmer and Zweim¨uller, 2000; Gross, 2004). In the long run, immigrants create more jobs than they occupy and unemployment lowers permanently (Gross, 2002).
You mean like Crispy Sotomayor running around in a MAGA hat telling cacs to shoot black children or David Clarke shytting on victims of police brutality on Fox news?
These guys have thousands of people watching them but y’all are pressed about some hypothetical African on Twitter?
Crazy the things people allow when it suits their agenda. nikkas was ready to clutch pearls and get fake offended at "nuffin" but are making posts like this that look they were peeled straight from the razor thin lips of some maga cac if I didnt know any better I'd swear this post was an impression.Then NYC must be the exception then, bc we're steady building. There are cranes all over the city. Rn in Harlem, they're buying churches and turning them into residential bldgs. You know how many churches there are in Harlem?! At least two on every city block. All being negotiated on, purchased, and developed. Right now.
There's plenty of work, but only if you're not locked out. Don't know what you're talking about. Yes, there was a lull after 2008, but it picked right back up.
Sources? I won't be accepting as legitimate any sources from globalists or their neoliberal minions, both groups having expressed 'no borders' sentiments in the recent past. Obviously, they'd have as much of an agenda as the right wingers. We need completely impartial sources, right?
"HITLER DIDN’T SNUB ME; IT WAS [FDR] WHO SNUBBED ME. THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T EVEN SEND ME A TELEGRAM."Hitler didn’t meet Owens...wtf
Pretty much.Just to clarify, are you saying that the Nazis weren't as racist as the Americans?
"HITLER DIDN’T SNUB ME; IT WAS [FDR] WHO SNUBBED ME. THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T EVEN SEND ME A TELEGRAM."
Which Leader Snubbed Jesse Owens? Hint: It Wasn't Hitler
Straight from his auto-biography.
Hitler didn’t meet Owens...wtf
"HITLER DIDN’T SNUB ME; IT WAS [FDR] WHO SNUBBED ME. THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T EVEN SEND ME A TELEGRAM."
Which Leader Snubbed Jesse Owens? Hint: It Wasn't Hitler
Straight from his auto-biography.
Hitler didn’t meet Owens...wtf
Yes, there's lots of construction work right now, but you don't get the point. If you want a stable income, if you raising a family, they you can't just go without work for 3-4 years at a time.
Look at that lull. There were damn near 2 million new homes a year for four years followed by an two-year collapse and then just 500k new homes for three years, and then it was 3-4 more years where the "recovery" didn't breach 1 million homes. That means for whoever was working in new home construction from 2003-2007, a full 3/4 of them had to find some other work from 2008-2014. What kind of career is that?
My uncle was in construction and he was older so he'd done well in his career and piled up a nest egg, but he still went WAY into debt during the lull. And he can do all sorts of shyt, he can work on any job but he was scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find work. He was talking about guys he knew leaving the field and he said he would have left himself if he was younger. This ain't the 90s anymore.
That's why you see so much migrant labor in construction. When the workload fluctuates by a factor of 400% depending on the year, you're not going to be able to fill permanent jobs for most of your crew.
As I said, construction in NYC had a slight lull and was right back on. You can't tell me what's going on in my own city, same way you told somebody upthread they can't tell you about Cali.The New York City Department of Buildings' report on construction in the city during 2018, recently released by Buildings Commissioner Rick D. Chandler, P.E., shows that construction activity leveled off after a historic real estate and development boom. DOB issued a total of 165,988 construction permits in 2018, down from 168,243 in 2017 -- a drop of about 1 percent. This was the first decline in total permits issued year-over-year since 2009. However, there is still an extraordinarily high level of construction activity in neighborhoods around the city, and 2018's permit totals are the second highest on record.
NYC Construction Activity Down Slightly in 2018 -- Occupational Health & Safety
I find that both of the 'neos' like to bomb and force people from their homes. As of late, they also seem to want those people to immigrate to 1st world nations bc they both require cheap labor, and many immigrants are complicit in this agenda.So far as neoliberals, I hate their agenda. That's well demonstrated.