Ann Coulter is Team Tariq

[Rakim Allah]

 

[saturn7]

@Barnett114 @Houston911


We need to keep bumping threads like this. Again, I understand we want free and open speech here, but there is a full brigade of users here, particularly those hanging on to that "ADOS" hashtag, who are here astroturfing being "pro-black" to promote far-right wing ideologies and convince black people to not vote with the clear goal of engineering election outcomes. It's obvious and this manipulation of our discourse needs to be checked.

I'm no Coulter supporter but I can acknowledge when a person I generally don't like says something correct.
What did Coulter say that was wrong when talking about the original intention of Civil Rights in the U.S.A.?
Why do Liberals get their panties in a bunch when anyone makes this statement.



Also @ 7:14.
Do you think the Liberal Kasparian gave an answer that the black community should be happy with? Especially considering how black youth our unemployed at higher rates than their peers?

 

[Wildhundreds]

@Barnett114 @Houston911

This thread was another gathering place for people that need to just be banned. This lady was the leading voice of white nationalist conservatism in America before Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson came through, and she still is. Like I said earlier in this thread, this is a woman who publicly CELEBRATES the death of Trayvon Martin and the acquittal of George Zimmerman like it's a national holiday, and here she is CELEBRATING a white nationalist terrorist who took a long arm ILLEGALLY to black protestors. C'mon now...I don't care WHAT nuanced philosophy of black power you believe in, anyone apologizing for, validating, or legitimizing this woman or her views in any way has no business being here. You have users in this thread who present themselves as pro-black movers and influencers, are telling people "don't vote for a black agenda!" all day and night, and then they are oddly passive of, if not promoting, white nationalism to boot....put two and two together and get rid of these clowns already.










We need to keep bumping threads like this. Again, I understand we want free and open speech here, but there is a full brigade of users here, particularly those hanging on to that "ADOS" hashtag, who are here astroturfing being "pro-black" to promote far-right wing ideologies and convince black people to not vote with the clear goal of engineering election outcomes. It's obvious and this manipulation of our discourse needs to be checked.

You actually believe people can do more on the coli to "sway" the black vote, than they could in person to the people thats around them?

 

[Wildhundreds]

I'm no Coulter supporter but I can acknowledge when a person I generally don't like says something correct.
What did Coulter say that was wrong when talking about the original intention of Civil Rights in the U.S.A.?
Why do Liberals get their panties in a bunch when anyone makes this statement.



Also @ 7:14.
Do you think the Liberal Kasparian gave an answer that the black community should be happy with? Especially considering how black youth our unemployed at higher rates than their peers?

I can't believe im witnessing an attack on free speech... I've "heard" the rumors, but to actually see it is troublesome..

 

[get these nets]

I'm no Coulter supporter but I can acknowledge when a person I generally don't like says something correct.
What did Coulter say that was wrong when talking about the original intention of Civil Rights in the U.S.A.?
Why do Liberals get their panties in a bunch when anyone makes this statement.



Also @ 7:14.
Do you think the Liberal Kasparian gave an answer that the black community should be happy with? Especially considering how black youth our unemployed at higher rates than their peers?

Coulter has been one of the most vocal critics of affirmative action policies FOR African Americans.

This recently new pivot is disingenuous, and everybody who knows her background would say the same thing.
Her books,lectures, and columns are out there for anybody to check out for themselves.
Here is a column of hers from 6 years ago.

Coulter: Would it kill you to hire more black cops? Yes.

Do you think her political/social views have evolved ? Or do you think this public pivot is politically motivated?

 

[saturn7]

Coulter has been one of the most vocal critics of affirmative action policies FOR African Americans.

This recently new pivot is disingenuous, and everybody who knows her background would say the same thing.
Her books,lectures, and columns are out there for anybody to check out for themselves.
Here is a column of hers from 6 years ago.

Coulter: Would it kill you to hire more black cops? Yes.

Do you think her political/social views have evolved ? Or do you think this public pivot is politically motivated?

No and yes.

Of course I don't think she is genuine and she is just doing this as an easy way to shyt on Liberals/Democrats. Coulter wouldn't be able to play this angle if Liberals were not totally dismissive of Black folks and didn't use the CRM to advance all these other groups except the group the CRM was originally intended for.

I don't want nor expect her support. However I expect better responses on issues like immigration and the racial wealth gap from our Democratic "allies".

 

[Houston911]

Sad that it's other mods spewing that immigrant hate tho

You mean the mod that has an African wife?

He don't hate immigrants

 

[Prince Akeem]

@Barnett114 @Houston911

This thread was another gathering place for people that need to just be banned. This lady was the leading voice of white nationalist conservatism in America before Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson came through, and she still is. Like I said earlier in this thread, this is a woman who publicly CELEBRATES the death of Trayvon Martin and the acquittal of George Zimmerman like it's a national holiday, and here she is CELEBRATING a white nationalist terrorist who took a long arm ILLEGALLY to black protestors. C'mon now...I don't care WHAT nuanced philosophy of black power you believe in, anyone apologizing for, validating, or legitimizing this woman or her views in any way has no business being here. You have users in this thread who present themselves as pro-black movers and influencers, are telling people "don't vote for a black agenda!" all day and night, and then they are oddly passive of, if not promoting, white nationalism to boot....put two and two together and get rid of these clowns already.










We need to keep bumping threads like this. Again, I understand we want free and open speech here, but there is a full brigade of users here, particularly those hanging on to that "ADOS" hashtag, who are here astroturfing being "pro-black" to promote far-right wing ideologies and convince black people to not vote with the clear goal of engineering election outcomes. It's obvious and this manipulation of our discourse needs to be checked.

 

[G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman]

You mean the mod that has an African wife?

He don't hate immigrants

There's a reason you came to your own conclusion on which mod I'm talking about

 

[get these nets]

No and yes.

Of course I don't think she is genuine and she is just doing this as an easy way to shyt on Liberals/Democrats. Coulter wouldn't be able to play this angle if Liberals were not totally dismissive of Black folks and didn't use the CRM to advance all these other groups except the group the CRM was originally intended for.

I don't want nor expect her support. However I expect better responses on issues like immigration and the racial wealth gap from our Democratic "allies".

I've been consistent here in agreeing with people pointing out that current Black leadership doesn't do enough to promote AA interests.
That's clear to any objective Black person, AA or of foreign background.

I can see the motivation behind it, though. Latino population has overtaken the total Black population, and the lgbt community has tremendous political power. Moving forward, it's in Black politicians' interest to cater to those communities. I get it.

The other white chick in this video has NO connection to Black people, and understands the growing power of the Latinos and gays. Without even seeing the video, I know and expect what she's going to say.

If anybody here is promoting practical ways to get elected officials to promote AA interests, I could and would get behind it.
People who exploit the frustration of that political neglect, instead of trying to counter it are easy to identify. Clear as day to any objective Black person,
AA or of foreign background.

Comments and rhetoric promoted by tariq and ann are meant to exploit the frustration people feel over political realities. Exploitation for their personal gain.

 

[Houston911]

There's a reason you came to your own conclusion on which mod I'm talking about

The mod I've seen you go back and forth with a ton of times and accuse of hating?

 

[G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman]

The mod I've seen you go back and forth with a ton of times and accuse of hating?

I don't even address that dude directly....that's how much of a lack of respect I have for him.

 

[Wildhundreds]

I've been consistent here in agreeing with people pointing out that current Black leadership doesn't do enough to promote AA interests.
That's clear to any objective Black person, AA or of foreign background.

I can see the motivation behind it, though. Latino population has overtaken the total Black population, and the lgbt community has tremendous political power. Moving forward, it's in Black politicians' interest to cater to those communities. I get it.

The other white chick in this video has NO connection to Black people, and understands the growing power of the Latinos and gays. Without even seeing the video, I know and expect what she's going to say.

If anybody here is promoting practical ways to get elected officials to promote AA interests, I could and would get behind it.
People who exploit the frustration of that political neglect, instead of trying to counter it are easy to identify. Clear as day to any objective Black person,
AA or of foreign background.

Comments and rhetoric promoted by tariq and ann are meant to exploit the frustration people feel over political realities. Exploitation for their personal gain.

This in the bold..

Pointing out a problem is easy..

But the action in trying to resolve the issue is how genuine concern is measured..

My expectations for the republican party is at 0.. Thats why people call me a "republican" because i don't brow beat a party that i have 0 expectations towards..

All she's did was point out a flaw in the democratic party, which i can appreciate, because that particular party champion themselves as the saviors of the world..

 

[acri1]

Here's Ann Coulter's new article about how BBB supposedly only benefits non-whites

The White House’s official press release announcing the Build Back Better Act (BBB) pitches it as a “PLAN TO REBUILD THE MIDDLE CLASS.” It rhapsodizes about “working families” squeezed by the economy, and reminds voters that “Biden promised to rebuild the backbone of the country — the middle class.”

A cartoon illustrates the sort of person who would benefit from Biden’s Build Back Better programs: “Linda,” a white woman, who works at a manufacturing plant but struggles to raise her son, “Leo.”

One thing the White House’s official press release did not mention is that almost all of the $2 trillion doled out under BBB is expressly designated for Black, Latino, Native American, Asian American, Pacific Islander and non-English speaking individuals. White Americans will get nothing and like it.

“Even provisions that don’t explicitly exclude whites, turn out, on closer examination, to exclude whites.”
Over and over again, the bill is written expressly NOT to help the hardworking Linda, apparently because she is white. Here are just a few examples:

— $1 billion to Native American, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian communities for housing “needs.”

— $500 million for minority-serving schools of medicine.


— $112 million for teacher preparation programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs).

— $75 million for culturally appropriate care management and services for older individuals who are racial and ethnic minorities or are underserved due to sexual orientation or gender identity.

— $75 million to study maternal health for pregnant and postpartum minority individuals.


— $50 million study maternal mortality among minorities.

— $50 million to improve behavioral health outcomes for communities of color with substance abuse.

— $75 million to increase research capacity at minority-serving institutions.

And on and on and on.

The very first item in Title II of the bill, titled “ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION,” is a program to distribute more than $100 million in grants to address “low diversity within the teacher and school leader workforce.” To be eligible for a grant, the recipient must have a plan “to increase the diversity of qualified individuals entering into the teacher, principal, or other school leader workforce.”

Similarly, the first provision of BBB’s “ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” section is: “Minority Business Development Agency.”


But wait — here’s a plot twist! This part also includes something for rural America! (So Democrats have heard of Appalachia.) Twenty-one percent of the country is rural. Twenty-four percent is non-white. Guess how the money is divvied up?

One billion dollars for minorities and $200 million for “rural business centers.”

Even provisions that don’t explicitly exclude whites, turn out, on closer examination, to exclude whites. I’ve never seen so many synonyms for “non-white,” such as “persistent poverty communities,” “historically economically distressed,” “historical injustice” and “underserved communities.”

Hang on, Ann — what makes you think “underserved” means “non-white”?

I refer you to page 111 of the bill:

“This section also defines an ‘underserved community’ as a group of people who have been systematically denied the full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life. Underserved communities include Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian American and Pacific Islanders, other persons of color, [etc.].”

How about changes to our environmental laws? White people love the environment! Sorry, out of luck, again, white boy.

BBB allocates almost $7 billion for “national service programs to carry out projects related to climate resilience and mitigation.” Unfortunately, however, all those billions have to go to “entities that serve and have representation from low-income communities …; utilize culturally competent and multilingual strategies; … implemented by diverse participants from communities being served.”

One billion dollars of the “Climate Resilience and Mitigation” loot is specifically directed to “individuals who were formally incarcerated.” [Sic.] Sure, climate change is important — but not as important as giving money to convicted felons!

What the hell happened to Linda?

Linda is wearing a hardhat, so her job has probably been outsourced. Maybe she’ll be helped by BBB’s humongous expansion of the Trade Adjustment Assistance program (TAA). That’s the law passed in the 1960s to compensate American workers whose jobs have been shipped abroad by globalist swine who couldn’t care less about their fellow Americans and don’t mind that every single thing we need, including masks and medicine, is made in China.

Surely, some white people will qualify for that — steelworkers, autoworkers, glass, plastic and paper manufacturing employees.

In fact, the BBB hijacks the whole idea of compensating globalism’s losers and turns the TAA into just another massive welfare scheme. Both the eligibility requirements and payment amounts are expanded beyond all reason, entitling “workers” to years and years of payouts, with no minimum employment period required, and no stipulation that trade has anything to do with the loss of their jobs.

Thus, for example, a program that is — again — meant to remunerate workers whose jobs were shipped abroad will now offer assistance to public sector employees. How does a government employee lose a job at all — much less to trade? (I only wish we had Chinese people running our grade schools.)

Naturally, states will be required to work with “training providers” that have a proven track record serving “Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian American and Pacific Islanders, other persons of color, members of other minority communities” and so on.

Republicans seem to think that if they just talk about how much Biden’s BBB plan costs, their job is done. They ought to read the bill. It might prompt them to finally say something about the Democrats’ clear animus against white Americans.

I Read Biden's Build Back Better Plan and...Oh, My God - Taki's Magazine


It's depressing that there are "black" people clownish enough to support or even want to be associated with this chick.

 

[Skooby]

Here's Ann Coulter's new article about how BBB supposedly only benefits non-whites



I Read Biden's Build Back Better Plan and...Oh, My God - Taki's Magazine


It's depressing that there are "black" people clownish enough to support or even want to be associated with this chick.

Almost nothing in the program is specifically for black Americans other than the little that's going to the black farmers.