null
...
Top 3 posters in this thread:
brehsimilitude - 53 posts
℃ertifed - 44 posts
Malcolmxxx_23 - 34 posts
Lol
Why do posters on here make such stupid comparisons lmao
Top 3 posters in this thread:
brehsimilitude - 53 posts
℃ertifed - 44 posts
Malcolmxxx_23 - 34 posts
Lol
Why do posters on here make such stupid comparisons lmao
Top 3 posters in this thread:
brehsimilitude - 53 posts
℃ertifed - 44 posts
Malcolmxxx_23 - 34 posts
Lol
Take a look again at what he was convicted for.look at at what he was actually convicted for and compare that to what all he was charged with. What I’m getting at is they stacked the charge sheet and most people are good with that. But if you have a strong case and he’s dead to rights you could have simply secured convictions for the most heinous of the crimes that we always say he’s done. But in hindsight he was never convicted of.
The whole for fukking kids is one of them. That was your statement. So I’m assuming he was convicted of fukking multiple kids and would be in jail for the next 30-50 years or how ever long that goes along with that but no they had to pull out some little used laws from the early 1900s. But we have pedos who are convicted of these heinous crimes daily rarely do they need to stack the charge sheet or use lesser known laws.
This isn’t saying R Kelly is innocent it’s just saying clearly justice was not of real concern.
If you think a library, or a book is "hidden", then you're making my point.
I read the rest of that shyt you posted twice and still don't know wtf your point is.
But I get the jest. You're pro-redpill and pro-Tate.
Self-improvement is a good thing.
Both Samuels and Tate have said valuable things, and both have said pure horeshyt.
Neither is to be taken 100%.
You just gotta learn how to discern the good info from the bad, and not follow people blindly off a cliff.
Breh are you crazy? They charged him with what they believed they could convict him on. If a pedo just has child porn, ofc they would just charge him with child porn. Kellz had DECADES of fukkery ofc his charges were going to be huge.
I hope youre trolling. you are making negative sense
"Kelly, 55, of Chicago, was convicted on three counts of producing child pornography and three counts of enticing a minor to engage in sexual activity. Each count of producing child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years in federal prison and a maximum of 20 years. The maximum sentence for each count of enticement of a minor is ten years. In all, Kelly faces a sentence of ten to 90 years in prison."Take a look again at what he was convicted for.look at at what he was actually convicted for and compare that to what all he was charged with. What I’m getting at is they stacked the charge sheet and most people are good with that. But if you have a strong case and he’s dead to rights you could have simply secured convictions for the most heinous of the crimes that we always say he’s done. But in hindsight he was never convicted of.
The whole for fukking kids is one of them. That was your statement. So I’m assuming he was convicted of fukking multiple kids and would be in jail for the next 30-50 years or how ever long that goes along with that but no they had to pull out some little used laws from the early 1900s. But we have pedos who are convicted of these heinous crimes daily rarely do they need to stack the charge sheet or use lesser known laws.
This isn’t saying R Kelly is innocent it’s just saying clearly justice was not of real concern.
"Kelly, 55, of Chicago, was convicted on three counts of producing child pornography and three counts of enticing a minor to engage in sexual activity. Each count of producing child pornography carries a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years in federal prison and a maximum of 20 years. The maximum sentence for each count of enticement of a minor is ten years. In all, Kelly faces a sentence of ten to 90 years in prison."
are you talking about them using the mann act and rico? because he fly kids across state lines on several occasions which is how they were able to use that. they hit him with rico because he had a network of people keeping his secrets secret and they used them to take him down
It’s scary that some of these nikkas have sisters and mothers. Like ol boy wouldn’t have your auntie somewhere tattooed up in a foreign country
Y’all keep thinking this is only on the internet. This is how the nikka that teaches your little girls 2nd grade PE class thinks about them
We just about right on time for a massive cultural shift in thinking. We’ve been allowed to go to far. It’s gonna either be a depression or a war in the next decade. Watch and see, too many evil minded folks out here and they too arrogant.
The times bout to hit our society with something that’s gonna make us all go
It’s scary that some of these nikkas have sisters and mothers. Like ol boy wouldn’t have your auntie somewhere tattooed up in a foreign country
Y’all keep thinking this is only on the internet. This is how the nikka that teaches your little girls 2nd grade PE class thinks about them
We just about right on time for a massive cultural shift in thinking. We’ve been allowed to go to far. It’s gonna either be a depression or a war in the next decade. Watch and see, too many evil minded folks out here and they too arrogant.
The times bout to hit our society with something that’s gonna make us all go
they used those acts as predicate to set up the charges. he was working with a network of people across multiple states those people were arrested flipped and helped set up the case they wanted to do. three states tossed charges at him its not like he just was some innocent bystander. That's how this shyt work. they didn't just have all the evidence fall in there laps in abc order and they just hit him with basic shyt. there is literally no conspiracy hereYes that’s exactly what I’m referring to. They didn’t need that they already had had the convictions based on evidence. Why toss in a rico where no one else is charged. A RICO where only one person is the organization.
I'm a Tate fan. But I'm not going to be here defending him. I don't know if he did it or not. Anyone here saying he is innocent or guilty is absolutely insane to me. You don't know him personally and all of the details of the case has not been released. If he is guilty then yes he deserves jailtime.