Conservatives are having a circle jerk with Michael Moore.
You can have your opinions, but you don't have to be a dikk about them
. Usually I'm with him on somethings, but you can't call snipers cowards and not expect to come out unscathed. Unless it was all calculated for him to be a fall guy about this movie
. But why? A waste of time and energy
he expounded a bit
"Lots of talk about snipers this weekend (the holiday weekend of a great man, killed by a sniper), so I thought I'd weigh in with what I was raised to believe about snipers," Moore wrote in his post. "My dad was in the First Marine Division in the South Pacific in World War II. His brother, my uncle, Lawrence Moore, was an Army paratrooper and was killed by a Japanese sniper 70 years ago next month."
"My dad always said, 'Snipers are cowards. They don't believe in a fair fight. Like someone coming up from behind you and coldcocking you. Just isn't right. It's cowardly to shoot a person in the back. Only a coward will shoot someone who can't shoot back.' "
"Awesome performance from Bradley Cooper," he wrote. "One of the best of the year. Great editing. Costumes, hair, makeup superb!"
"Too bad Clint gets Vietnam and Iraq confused in his storytelling," said Moore. "And that he has his characters calling Iraqis 'savages' throughout the film."
"
There is also anti-war sentiment expressed in the movie. And there's a touching ending," he posted. "Also, best movie trailer and TV ads of the year."
I agree with his last statement. I can understand the point of view of thinking snipers are cowardly, but at the end of the day, war is war, snipers are very useful on either side, and anyone who is willing to go to war isn't much of a coward to me. At the end of the day the person is trying to come out of that situation alive. Shooting an enemy in the back, or not. I guess we should alll lineup in a straight line like the revolutionary war and shoot into eachother