When she said he didn't obey her command, I already knew she was lying. That's the same defense all cops use when they shoot unarmed Black men. Even if you're a cop, if you open your door to your own home and find a stranger in your apartment, you don't give commands, then shoot the person because they don't obey them, like you're out in the streets, unless you want to shoot the person anyway. Most people who are cautious would ask, "who's there", or "what are you doing in my home, etc...", especially if the stranger isn't acting aggressive, which it doesn't sound like this man was doing. Being a cop don't give you the right to shoot and ask questions later. So that "He didn't follow my commands" ain't gonna cut it. Like I said, she sounds guilty for even using that excuse without asking the man anything first. Sound like she's just trying to find a legal way to say she killed him. If she had first asked the man any questions like what I mentioned, but he kept coming forward, then her story would make a little more sense, not saying she couldn't still be lying. But the reason she didn't asked any questions is because she came in there with the intent to kill. So basically, she's saying she came in the apartment, said don't move, then killed the man because he moved. It doesn't look like she gave him time to say anything, although he probably did. If he didn't say anything, then she obviously shot him too fast, more likely on purpose, because it wouldn't take but a few seconds before any of us to start asking a stranger what they where doing in our apartment, etc... Now if the man was too scared because he didn't know who it was, then that would make him even less the aggressor.
The other explanation for him not saying anything would be because he let her in, or knew her. And based on the witnesses, this sound more like the case. Anyway, she sounds guilty to me regardless. No cop with training, is going to do what she did, again unless they did it on purpose. And if I'm not mistaken, in most states she wouldn't be allowed to shoot him if he was in her apartment, if he wasn't threatening her with bodily harm. But I don't know what the law is in Texas on that. But since it was his own apartment, and if Texas does have that law, then this case should really be closed.
I still haven't heard anybody answer why she was trying to use her key to open a door that was ajar. People are use to sticking their key in the key-latch strait forward, when the door is shut. If the door was ajar, then your instinct would tell you something was wrong, because you'd miss the key-latch, since the door would be opened, and in an angle, or you wouldn't try using your key at all. I'd like to know how long she was trying to use her key. Again, who tries to stick their key in a key-latch in a door that's prompt open, even slightly prompt open.