Bond is only 10% of stated bail.. so she’s out on 30k bond.. Someone prob put up their house as collateral
Amber Guyger Found Guilty of Murder!!!..... 10 years
- Thread starter Standing on business
- Start date
Bond is only 10% of stated bail.. so she’s out on 30k bond.. Someone prob put up their house as collateral
I know one thing if she walks Dallas brehs better burn that shyt down...
Why did the police chief hand over the investigation too the Texas Rangers? What Dallas PD and the DA’s office not capable of investigating their own officers?
So two witnesses say they heard her yelling and banging on the door. The affidavit says that the door was cracked and she walked in....
So two witnesses say they heard her yelling and banging on the door. The affidavit says that the door was cracked and she walked in....
Which was basically impossible as shown in the video from shauns twitter. On top of that there's still the matter of her completely missing brightly lit up numbers next to the door and the red mat outside the door.
The amount of lying being done here is insulting to everyone's intelligence.
So NOW the brother’s music was too loud
Haven’t we heard this story before? They couldn’t find not one SPECK of dirt on this dude’s life so now its the old “the ****** was playing his jungle hippity hop music too loud so off with his fukking head” shyt?
fukk this entire debacle man. This shyt gonna legit have me angry all week
Haven’t we heard this story before? They couldn’t find not one SPECK of dirt on this dude’s life so now its the old “the ****** was playing his jungle hippity hop music too loud so off with his fukking head” shyt?
fukk this entire debacle man. This shyt gonna legit have me angry all week
He always played his music too loud AND he didn't comply to her orders. That's how dumb they think people are.So NOW the brother’s music was too loud
Haven’t we heard this story before? They couldn’t find not one SPECK of dirt on this dude’s life so now its the old “the ****** was playing his jungle hippity hop music too loud so off with his fukking head” shyt?
fukk this entire debacle man. This shyt gonna legit have me angry all week
The God Poster
LWO representa
From what I've read the crakkka ass police Union put up the money.
So NOW the brother’s music was too loud
Haven’t we heard this story before? They couldn’t find not one SPECK of dirt on this dude’s life so now its the old “the ****** was playing his jungle hippity hop music too loud so off with his fukking head” shyt?
fukk this entire debacle man. This shyt gonna legit have me angry all week
NO, THIS IS GOOD.
WE FINALLY HAVE A MOTIVE.
WE SAW A CRAKKKA KILL JORDAN DAVIS
OVER THE SAME shyt.
NOW IT ALL MAKES SENSE
WITH HER BANGING,
YELLING OPEN THE DOOR.
IF IT COMES OUT THAT SHE MADE A COMPLAINT BEFORE
SHES GETTING A MURDER CHARGE.
Lifejennings
Superstar
Why are the noise complaints even a topic for discussion?
U pass a total of 9 units with loud music n weed smoke comin
N they have courtesy officers from dpd staffed
Motive/premeditated
HARLEM AL
Your broad loves me.....
Make sense...
NO, THIS IS GOOD.
WE FINALLY HAVE A MOTIVE.
WE SAW A CRAKKKA KILL JORDAN DAVIS
OVER THE SAME shyt.
NOW IT ALL MAKES SENSE
WITH HER BANGING,
YELLING OPEN THE DOOR.
IF IT COMES OUT THAT SHE MADE A COMPLAINT BEFORE
SHES GETTING A MURDER CHARGE.
Playa, if she get off on this I don’t know what I would do. I’m still trying wrap my head around this shyt.
Mike Nasty
Superstar
Earlier in this several posters where talking about the difference between manslaughter and murder, and how it's not murder but manslaughter if she went into his apartment by accident. When you add in the prior music complaints it starts to show a motive which makes this looks a lot more like a murder, cause she would of had a reason to go to his door. Add in the red carpet and some of the neighbors testimony, and now it looks a murder. Ironically her earlier excuse that she had worked 14hrs, will hopefully come back to bite her in the ass, as that would be yet another for her to bang on his door about music.
Even the right wing media is blasting this woman.
Aside from the horrific details of the shooting itself, there are already troubling indications that Guyger’s identity as a police officer is providing her with actual, undeserved advantages in the prosecution of this case.
First, police sources are reportedly indicating that Guyger may actually try to raise the fact that Jean didn’t obey her commands as a defense. It’s not a defense. The moment she opened the door to an apartment that wasn’t her own, she wasn’t operating as a police officer clothed with the authority of the law. She was instead a criminal. She was breaking into another person’s home. She was an armed home invader, and the person clothed with the authority of law to defend himself was Botham Shem Jean.
Which brings us to the second troubling element of the story. So far, Guyger is only charged with manslaughter. But all the available evidence indicates that she intentionally shot Jean. This wasn’t a warning shot gone awry. The pistol didn’t discharge during a struggle. She committed a crime by forcing open Jean’s door, deliberately took aim, and killed him.
quite simply as “intentionally or knowingly caus[ing] the death of an individual.” Manslaughter, by contrast, occurs when a person “recklessly” causes death. Guyger’s warning and her deliberate aim scream intent. She may have “recklessly” gone to the wrong apartment, but she very intentionally killed Jean. There is a chance that the grand jury will increase the charge to murder, so the early manslaughter charge is tentative. But I ask you: If Jean had mistakenly gone to Guyger’s apartment and then gunned her down in cold blood after demanding that she follow his commands, would he face a manslaughter charge?
Finally, it’s troubling that Guyger wasn’t arrested and booked until three days after the shooting. Reportedly, Dallas police had prepared a warrant the day after the killing, but they handed the investigation over to the Texas Rangers, who put a hold on the warrant.
What’s done is done, and the delayed arrest shouldn’t have any ultimate impact on the prosecution, but when all the available evidence indicates that a cop acted outside of her lawful authority, she should receive none of the courtesies and advantages so often extended to members of law enforcement. She’s a citizen, like any other, and it is hard to imagine — again — that if the roles had been reversed Jean would have enjoyed several days of relative freedom before he was arrested and booked. He’d have been in handcuffs that night, and rightfully so.
There is need for vigorous debate about the extent of police misconduct toward black men. I am unconvinced by the “open season” rhetoric, and the data supporting claims that police are more trigger-happy when confronting black men is controversial and conflicting. Without question, that’s an issue worth serious inquiry and study, and no one single incident or handful of incidents is dispositive or even all that relevant to settling it.
At the same time, however, each individual incident demands fair inquiry and the impartial administration of justice. Yet this has too often proven difficult. Juries credit officers for their fearwithout properly determining whether that fear was “reasonable.” And thus we’ve seen the sad spectacle of a mistrialafter a cop shot an unarmed, running man in the back; the acquittal of the Minnesota cop who shot Philando Castile as Castile was doing his best to comply with the cop’s panicked, conflicting demands; and the acquittal of the cop who shot a sobbing Daniel Shaver as he crawled on his hands and knees, begging for his life.
Indeed, the justice system is often so stacked in officers’ favor that they enjoy qualified immunity, a judge-made rule that blocks even civil lawsuits against those who make dangerous and deadly mistakes.
We ask police officers to be brave. We ask officers to face a much higher degree of danger than civilians. We ask them to show restraint even in the face of provocations and tense confrontations. There are countless among them who do all we ask, and more. But we also ask something else: that police officers be subject to the very laws they’re sworn to enforce.
That’s where the system has failed in all too many cases, wounding a family that’s already suffering and breaking the public’s trust each time. At present there’s no evidence that Amber Guyger woke up Thursday morning intending to kill anyone. One can certainly feel a degree of sympathy for a person who makes a terrible mistake. But sympathy must not be allowed to cloud the quest for justice. Guyger’s blue uniform should not grant her a single advantage in the investigation and prosecution to come.
Amber Guyger Botham Shem Jean Police Shooting: Tragedy Shows Need for Cops to Face Impartial Justice | National Review
The closest thing a right leaning publication will come to saying fukk the cops
Aside from the horrific details of the shooting itself, there are already troubling indications that Guyger’s identity as a police officer is providing her with actual, undeserved advantages in the prosecution of this case.
First, police sources are reportedly indicating that Guyger may actually try to raise the fact that Jean didn’t obey her commands as a defense. It’s not a defense. The moment she opened the door to an apartment that wasn’t her own, she wasn’t operating as a police officer clothed with the authority of the law. She was instead a criminal. She was breaking into another person’s home. She was an armed home invader, and the person clothed with the authority of law to defend himself was Botham Shem Jean.
Which brings us to the second troubling element of the story. So far, Guyger is only charged with manslaughter. But all the available evidence indicates that she intentionally shot Jean. This wasn’t a warning shot gone awry. The pistol didn’t discharge during a struggle. She committed a crime by forcing open Jean’s door, deliberately took aim, and killed him.
quite simply as “intentionally or knowingly caus[ing] the death of an individual.” Manslaughter, by contrast, occurs when a person “recklessly” causes death. Guyger’s warning and her deliberate aim scream intent. She may have “recklessly” gone to the wrong apartment, but she very intentionally killed Jean. There is a chance that the grand jury will increase the charge to murder, so the early manslaughter charge is tentative. But I ask you: If Jean had mistakenly gone to Guyger’s apartment and then gunned her down in cold blood after demanding that she follow his commands, would he face a manslaughter charge?
Finally, it’s troubling that Guyger wasn’t arrested and booked until three days after the shooting. Reportedly, Dallas police had prepared a warrant the day after the killing, but they handed the investigation over to the Texas Rangers, who put a hold on the warrant.
What’s done is done, and the delayed arrest shouldn’t have any ultimate impact on the prosecution, but when all the available evidence indicates that a cop acted outside of her lawful authority, she should receive none of the courtesies and advantages so often extended to members of law enforcement. She’s a citizen, like any other, and it is hard to imagine — again — that if the roles had been reversed Jean would have enjoyed several days of relative freedom before he was arrested and booked. He’d have been in handcuffs that night, and rightfully so.
There is need for vigorous debate about the extent of police misconduct toward black men. I am unconvinced by the “open season” rhetoric, and the data supporting claims that police are more trigger-happy when confronting black men is controversial and conflicting. Without question, that’s an issue worth serious inquiry and study, and no one single incident or handful of incidents is dispositive or even all that relevant to settling it.
At the same time, however, each individual incident demands fair inquiry and the impartial administration of justice. Yet this has too often proven difficult. Juries credit officers for their fearwithout properly determining whether that fear was “reasonable.” And thus we’ve seen the sad spectacle of a mistrialafter a cop shot an unarmed, running man in the back; the acquittal of the Minnesota cop who shot Philando Castile as Castile was doing his best to comply with the cop’s panicked, conflicting demands; and the acquittal of the cop who shot a sobbing Daniel Shaver as he crawled on his hands and knees, begging for his life.
Indeed, the justice system is often so stacked in officers’ favor that they enjoy qualified immunity, a judge-made rule that blocks even civil lawsuits against those who make dangerous and deadly mistakes.
We ask police officers to be brave. We ask officers to face a much higher degree of danger than civilians. We ask them to show restraint even in the face of provocations and tense confrontations. There are countless among them who do all we ask, and more. But we also ask something else: that police officers be subject to the very laws they’re sworn to enforce.
That’s where the system has failed in all too many cases, wounding a family that’s already suffering and breaking the public’s trust each time. At present there’s no evidence that Amber Guyger woke up Thursday morning intending to kill anyone. One can certainly feel a degree of sympathy for a person who makes a terrible mistake. But sympathy must not be allowed to cloud the quest for justice. Guyger’s blue uniform should not grant her a single advantage in the investigation and prosecution to come.
Amber Guyger Botham Shem Jean Police Shooting: Tragedy Shows Need for Cops to Face Impartial Justice | National Review
The closest thing a right leaning publication will come to saying fukk the cops
G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
if he didnt obey her "command" was it because he said....."this is my appartement" ???
was it because he was shocked you were intruding??
its really a weak defense