Amber Guyger Found Guilty of Murder!!!..... 10 years

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
16,987
Reputation
3,458
Daps
62,513
Reppin
Hackney, London
What are they saying
They want Mistake of Fact & Self Defence to be allowed to be considered for the jury to think about.

Judge allowed it because she wants the verdict to be lawful.

The defense rested their case so it seems that the trial is in its closing stages.
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,150
Daps
204,785
This line of questioning on the cross examination should probably put the nail in her coffin:

Lead prosecutor Jason Hermus: "For your safety, you should have taken a position of cover and concealment and got help...and, instead, you decided to go in."

Amber Guyger: "Yes, I did go in."

Hermus: "You had a police radio on you, didn't you?"

Guyger: "I did."

Hermus: "Did it work?"

Guyger: "It did."

Hermus: "Did you live two blocks away from police headquarters?"

Guyger: "Yes, sir."

Hermus: "You know that, when you call out as a police officer, the number one thing for every other police officer is to come help you if you say that you need help...?"

Guyger: "Yes, sir."

Hermus: "You know that the response time on this call was about two minutes and bodies were at the apartment...?"

Guyger: "Yes, sir."

Hermus: "So, you could have taken a position of cover and concealment. You could have called for help on your radio and you could have had the cavalry there in two minutes?

Guyger: "I could have."

Hermus: "You could have had SWAT mobilized..."

Guyger: "They could have."

Hermus: "You could have had K9 mobilized... "

Guyger: "They could have, also."

Hermus: "And had you done any one of those things, Mr. Jean would probably be alive today. Right?"

Guyger: "Yes, sir."

Wow
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,243
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,315
In addition to Guyger being guilty just by looking at the facts of the case her defense did a real shytty ass job. I would say there is no way she gets off, but we know how this goes for white people.
Based on the facts and circumstances her defense could only do a bad job
 

Numpsay

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
14,764
Reputation
2,251
Daps
38,934
Reppin
PAT 2 HTown
I just got caught up on the charges being included. This is a bunch of bullshyt going on here.

1. Castle Doctrine should not be considered as she was not in her own home and also Jean was not imminently committing a crime when she did enter.

2. Mistake of Fact/Self Defense-I can consider this if she was on trial for criminal trespassing into the apartment because it was hers, but her actions after entering was unreasonable and mistake of fact/self defense should not be considered.

3. Manslaughter- Should not be considered based on what I said in a previous post. Realize if she is found guilty on manslaughter that will be easily overturned in appeals court based on the law.
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
16,987
Reputation
3,458
Daps
62,513
Reppin
Hackney, London
How come the defense is still speaking?

One defense lawyer finished his argument then no neck defense lawyer pops up.

US brehs, is this normal?
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,370
Reputation
490
Daps
8,017
Reppin
NULL
The defence closing statement..saying he was smoking weed which confused him wtf

Lol, by her own testimony, she gave this dude seconds. She entered the room knowing she was gonna shoot someone. Prosecution is right, this important to everyone. Need to end this cops get to shoot at anything that's remotely a threat excuse. It's as if their perception is greater than reality.
 
Top