Amber Guyger Found Guilty of Murder!!!..... 10 years

Strapped

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,210
Reputation
2,584
Daps
54,543
Reppin
404
Can you explain? :lupe:


From here:

A fatal traffic wreck involving Texas Ranger David Armstrong of Dallas is a good example of the double standards inside DPS. On February 2, 2017, Ranger Armstrong was returning from a special operations shift on the Mexican border when he crashed his DPS vehicle into a pickup truck, ejecting both the driver and the passenger. After several weeks, a DPS Highway Patrol accident reconstruction team was able to recover the vehicle’s computer to confirm his speed at the time of the crash. He was driving 84 miles per hour on Highway 281 in Premont, where the posted speed limit was 45 miles per hour. Ranger Armstrong fractured his hip, and his DPS vehicle burned down to the metal. The passenger of the other vehicle, 30-year-old JD Kristopher Trevino of Premont, died of his injuries five days after the wreck. Even though the accident occurred in Premont city limits, and even though accidents in municipalities are normally investigated by city police, DPS handled the investigation so it could cover up what happened. Among other things, Ranger Armstrong was violating a DPS safety rule at the time of the accident. That rule mandates that officers working on the border take a six-hour rest period before driving home, and the rule had been in effect for more than a year at the time of the accident. Ranger Armstrong had repeatedly violated the rule – a fact known to his supervisors – and he was violating it again when he was driving through Premont at 10:15 p.m. Although most drivers would have been charged with manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, or at least reckless driving, Ranger Armstrong was never charged with anything, nor was he disciplined. Instead, the entire incident was covered up by senior DPS commanders, and Ranger Armstrong is now leading a high-profile investigation into a police shooting in Dallas.

This poster researched what i reposted dap & rep that muthafuka @MasterOfAllHeSurveyz
 
Last edited:

⠀X ⠀

Geoff
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
17,656
Reputation
5,592
Daps
101,782
Regarding Ranger Armstrong, we all do realize that the jury did not hear his testimony where he said that he felt that she didn't commit a crime, right? So I wouldn't be surprised if the defense brings him back on the stand
 

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,580
Reputation
35
Daps
57,290
i havent watched any footage yet, has the state mentioned anything other than the red door mat, pertaining to clues she would've noticed that she wasn't at her apartment? everyone keeps mentioning the door mat, fukk his door mat. what about his neighbor's mats? any other clues that it's a different floor. decorations on someones door, a light thats out, mismatched paint, shrubs in different spots from one floor to the next, hell, the feeling of being at a different elevation; the fukking list im sure goes on and on, but all they want to mention is 1 thing? kiss my dog ass. several DOZEN differences along the route to either his or her apartment from the moment you drive onto the property, including in the parking garage. any sensible person can thus conclude there's no way she could've been confused about where she was; that her route was intentional, and upon arriving at that brothers door, she promptly shot him. Murder

The majority of the time spent by prosecution was trying to show all the things she should have seen and noticed that she would know she was on the wrong floor...
One of the neighbors on the 3th floor, I believe.. lil well spoken black girl. Had a big plant on the outside of her door.
It was very noticeable...

The thing about the trial tho...
If that's what the prosecution's game plan was, to show the cues that the cop was on the wrong floor...
It was a terrible plan because every person that got on the stand mentioned how difficult it was to know which floor u were on...
The tenants, the police, investigators, etc... all said the same thing.

And these are the witnesses that the State was presenting smh...
 
Last edited:

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,580
Reputation
35
Daps
57,290
I’m shock that they didn’t bring the witness known as bunny to testify since she recorded that long as video after what she said was straight lies when the incident first happened

There has been things said that this "bunny" person is not reliable...

I would hate to believe that prosecution is not doing their due diligence
 

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,580
Reputation
35
Daps
57,290
Regarding Ranger Armstrong, we all do realize that the jury did not hear his testimony where he said that he felt that she didn't commit a crime, right? So I wouldn't be surprised if the defense brings him back on the stand

The judge did not want the jury to hear that...
They would have to present Armstrong's opinion in a different way
 

killacal

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
30,869
Reputation
9,107
Daps
178,821
It could have been the other way too tho .

Him seeing a gun and trying to move, duck, get down out the way of being shot... like most people would do
They could tell by the entrance wound if its direct or he was ducking
It's not possible to be anything but her firing down on him
 

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,580
Reputation
35
Daps
57,290
They could tell by the entrance wound if its direct or he was ducking
It's not possible to be anything but her firing down on him

Are u watching the trial?
Did any expert give definitive testimony about how she fire on him.?

During cross examination... there was a person on stand talking about the wounds and trajectory, and I remember him saying it could have been from him standing or crouching...

From what ur saying she would have had to standing closer to him...
 

Laidbackman

All Star
Joined
Jul 9, 2017
Messages
5,114
Reputation
406
Daps
8,150
Reppin
ATL, but rasied in DMV
I'm hearing that Rivera, the cop she was sexting is married, and his wife, whose been coming to trial with him, had to hear all this in front of everybody. Looks like Rivera is about to lose his wife and his side-piece. Now that it's clear Amber Guyger was just a side-piece, I know she was about to take her frustrations out on another man sooner or later, like they always do, that's if she hadn't been doing it already. I wonder how many times Rivera texted her at the last minute, and cancelled the D for the night, or just straight up stood her up. This dame was a walking time bomb, ready to kill a man the first chance she felt the light was green. It looks like this brother was her perfect target for some reason.
 
Last edited:

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,793
Reputation
12,017
Daps
375,298
Reppin
CHICAGO
Yep, I'll add if it's a mistrial the prosecutors and defense attorneys can work out a plea deal instead of going to trial again which I doubt will happen.

I'm just curious who's bankrolling this bytch. Supposedly she has a really good team of attorneys. A local legal expert was on the radio here in Dallas earlier saying that she's most likely paying six figures for each attorney. How does a 30 yr old police officer afford that plus the $500k bond she already posted?

THESE CACS GET CROWD FUNDING EVERYTIME THEY KILL A NEGRO.


:devil:
:evil:

 

⠀X ⠀

Geoff
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
17,656
Reputation
5,592
Daps
101,782
You think they'll bring up her social media posts when she testifies?

I'm wondering how hard they'll go at her.
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,684
Reputation
1,906
Daps
29,918
Reppin
NULL
The majority of the time spent by prosecution was trying to show all the things she should have seen and noticed that she would know she was on the wrong floor...
One of the neighbors on the 3th floor, I believe.. lil well spoken black girl. Had a big plant on the outside of her door.
It was very noticeable...

The thing about the trial tho...
If that's what the prosecution's game plan was, to show the cues that the cop was on the wrong floor...
It was a terrible plan because every person that guy on the stand mentioned how difficult it was to know which floor u were on...
The tenants, the police, investigators, etc... all said the same thing.

And these are the witnesses that the State was presenting smh...

It's like the trial is about the wrong thing. Going to the wrong apartment by accident isn't a crime and is actually believable. Trespassing, breaking in and shooting someone in their own home is a crime and inexcusable. They focused way to heavy on what led up to the shooting when it's not even relevant at the end of the day. They are over complicating a simple case to get her off.
 
Top