Amare Stoudemire snapped on fan

[Absolut]

dude acts like private e mails/text messages dont cause some people to lose jobs, or be used as evidence in the court of law and shyt. who gives a fukk if it was a private message?

 

[daboywonder2002]

i sent that fan a tweet yesterday. dude is a straight snitch.

 

[seemorecizzy]

It's one thing to talk shyt to someone, you can't call someone a faq though.

I mean Jack didn't get fined for

da gay parade is in a couple days
amare had bad timing


the fan is a snitching ass fakkit
i really hate when fans talk reckless and when da celebrity responses reckless they get all offended (eg lebron swearing at dat fan who was talkin bout his mom and delonte)

 

[daboywonder2002]

first thing that snitch tweets when hearing from amare is @D_Marino4 I gotta send this to #ESPN ASAP! Sorry @Amareisreal

 

[Real Talk of NY]

He's not getting prosecuted for saying this. That's what the first amendment does, protect him from government prosecution. Doesn't prevent your employer from taking action for what you say or do.

enlighten me why someone should be fined by their employer for having a private conversation outside of work. Thats like saying we should fine racists for calling me a ni99er in private.

I guess i should stop insulting people on xbox live messages because I might lose my job.

 

[Absolut]

if people find out about said convo, then its not private. if steve nash walked around calling dudes racist slurs in private messages and it hit the media, he would be fined by the league just the same. should the racist piece of shyt pizza delivery guy that called the woman slurs all over that voice mail still have his job because it was a private phone call? fukk outta here

 

[Data-Hawk]

enlighten me why someone should be fined by their employer for having a private conversation outside of work. Thats like saying we should fine racists for calling me a ni99er in private.

You haven't heard about all the people that got fired over facebook? and i'm talking about regular people or about how some jobs want access to their employee's facebook account or want access to your FB account during the interview process?

Depending on the company, you represent them even when you aren't on the clock. The HR dept @ my job has people dedicated to social media and they send out warnings all the time in emails.

Not saying it's fair, but I understand. and if that racists was a public figure yall would expose them also.

 

[jwinfield]

enlighten me why someone should be fined by their employer for having a private conversation outside of work. Thats like saying we should fine racists for calling me a ni99er in private.

I guess i should stop insulting people on xbox live messages because I might lose my job.

When private conversation becomes known to the public, it's no longer a private conversation.

When public conversation involves conduct that goes against that employer's code, they have the right to take disciplinary action.

Even if said conduct doesn't violate the employer's code, but draws a huge backlash and as a result hurt's the employer's money making ability, you've become a problem for them and they can take action.

Like Imus getting fired from CBS and MSNBC for the "nappy headed hoes" comment. If people give him a pass for that comment he doesn't get fired. But people got pissed, called for his dismissal, sponsors started pulling their ads, he lost money for the company.

One of my jobs, at orientation we had social media training, that said we represent the company and we have to watch the shyt we put on there. And we found out that the boss had someone look at our facebook profiles to make sure we didn't have any dumb shyt on there.

 

[Real Talk of NY]

Thats still BS. People should have the right to say what they want in private. Thats how it used to be. I would sue the NBA over that shyt and I bet you I'd win in the supreme court.

 

[Real Talk of NY]

When private conversation becomes known to the public, it's no longer a private conversation.

When public conversation involves conduct that goes against that employer's code, they have the right to take disciplinary action.

Even if said conduct doesn't violate the employer's code, but draws a huge backlash and as a result hurt's the employer's money making ability, you've become a problem for them and they can take action.

Like Imus getting fired from CBS and MSNBC for the "nappy headed hoes" comment. If people give him a pass for that comment he doesn't get fired. But people got pissed, called for his dismissal, sponsors started pulling their ads, he lost money for the company.

Imus said that on air. That was public. If he had said it in a mail to someone I wouldnt care about it.

 

[Absolut]

you have the right to say whatever the fukk you want, wherever the fukk you want. your employer also has the right to sever your employment/take other disciplinary action if they dont like what you say

 

[jwinfield]

Thats still BS. People should have the right to say what they want in private. Thats how it used to be. I would sue the NBA over that shyt and I bet you I'd win in the supreme court.

 

[jwinfield]

Imus said that on air. That was public. If he had said it in a mail to someone I wouldnt care about it.

And if the person that received that letter made it public and there was a similar backlash, Imus would've met the same fate.

 

[Data-Hawk]

Thats still BS. People should have the right to say what they want in private. Thats how it used to be. I would sue the NBA over that shyt and I bet you I'd win in the supreme court.

If it's company policy, how would you win? the message was made public.

 

[Absolut]

so, in other words, you think that racist pizza delivery bigot should still be employed, since he used those slurs on a private phone call with that woman?