I'll be on for sure@JParker @Jayrose3 @1970s HeRon Flow @LinusCaldwell If we on tonight, y'all know we have to discuss this.
Absolutely agreed.
I think alot of people who hear a perspective such as mine are afraid that I'm somehow making excuses for or taking the share of shame that violent elements in the community away.
Not at all.
We definitely need to adjust certain glorificationd and normalizing of dysfunction.
That being said, if this country is not made aware of how dysfunction comes from ineffective gov't service... We'll be essentially attempting to climb up a smooth rock while it's raining; very difficult.
I agree with Iverson.
He came from a rough area. If you came from that type environment then you know black on black crime IS a problem.
Y’all can deflect blame all you want but it’s the truth.
Did you really just neglect to read all of the valuable opinions in this thread to just post some simple ass bullshyt?
Even the term black on black crime reeks of some cac shyt.
Iverson posted something simple and nikkas writing 2 page papers off a couple sentences.
If we can’t rise above that shyt just state the truth and say we can’t.. Rising above is the only option because the white man is not going to fix the issue they caused.
Nothing fancy just the “simple” truth. Maybe we just destined to live in poverty and kill each other. Institutionalized racism is the reason as a group we in the situation we in BUT it ain’t the end all be a for black people.
That’s just my opinion tho. You got to play the cards you was dealt.
You're the problem"Black on Black crime" is a myth. The number 1 indicator of crime perpetrated from one individual unto another in the United States is proximity.
"Black on black crime" insinuates that black people are looking for and targeting specifically black people. Just like "white on white crime". When actually, gang violence, neighbor disputes, etc. are more based upon demographics of the area. There is crime in all areas. In areas with highly concentrated numbers of black people, black people commit crimes against other black people. In areas with highly concentrated numbers of white people, white people commit crimes against other white people.
"Black on black crime" was a way for someone who is not black to point a finger at black people, and it worked sadly Instead of looking at police brutality (the abuse of power from someone meant to serve the public) we are shown numbers of criminals committing crimes and told to focus on the race of those involved, a completely unrelated argument.
Black people should not say "we need to end black on black crime" because that is just "crime". What we need to focus on is changing gang culture in African American communities. We need to be specific with our conversations, our plans, and our actions, instead of just saying "black on black crime"
Breh, you're on some disrespectful shyt and you don't realize it.Iverson posted something simple and nikkas writing 2 page papers off a couple sentences.
If we can’t rise above that shyt just state the truth and say we can’t.. Rising above is the only option because the white man is not going to fix the issue they caused.
Nothing fancy just the “simple” truth. Maybe we just destined to live in poverty and kill each other. Institutionalized racism is the reason as a group we in the situation we in BUT it ain’t the end all be a for black people.
That’s just my opinion tho. You got to play the cards you was dealt.
No. 1, I've been one of the biggest critics of that breh.A lot of these dudes have listen to so much Tariq that they take everything as c00n talk if it calls out an issue.
That's yall favorite strawman/dog whistle to dismiss ppl's opinions ain't it? It used to be cac, c00n, agent. Now it's tariq.A lot of these dudes have listen to so much Tariq that they take everything as c00n talk if it calls out an issue.
I came from that environment too. The PROBLEM is making it about us being black and simply saying black people just have to do better. It’s bigger than us.I agree with Iverson.
He came from a rough area. If you came from that type environment then you know black on black crime IS a problem.
Y’all can deflect blame all you want but it’s the truth.
Breh, you're on some disrespectful shyt and you don't realize it.
Today, though, I'm not on some troll shyt. I'm mature.
Iverson posted something, right?
And what did you think the goal was? To get civil rights leaders dikk hard?
No, it was to stir conversation and create the momentum for intellectual discussion on black issues; even if we disagree.
We are all going to disagree and while so many holier than thou people can somehow look at this thread like it was a waste... nikkas are hypocrites trying to derail discussion but somehow expect brehs who are in much more stressful circumstance to talk it out and rise above violence.
There is a bigger problem related to the black community than violence. It's a disrespect of the next breh's opinion.
I definitely don't agree with him or your opinion. However, I respected Iverson's opinion enough for me not to just create a thread and say, "fukk that nikka."
The audacity of brehs to shame the street nikka for not being able to talk out their issues and communicate with the nikka in the next hood... Yet on a black site, the same brehs are disregarding the next breh's opinion just because it differs. Ironic.
That being said, I appreciate your reading my post, if you did.