ALL TIME....THE HEART BREAK KID SHAWN MICHAELS...or the MACHO MAN RANDY SAVAGE...REAL simple
- Thread starter Ed MOTHEREFFING G
- Start date
Tako
Bench warmer
Macho King 
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
IT'S HARD TO DO A HEARTBREAK KID IMPRESSION UNLESS YOU CAN MOVE ONE EYEBALL LIKE A GECKO, BROTHER!
Macho Man was a SUPERSTAR from day one..you can't say that about anyone else in history. Not Flair. Not Hogan. Austin. Lesnar. Andre. Angle. Bret. LOD. Jake. Hall. Nash. Eddie. No one started from the get go as good and as great and the aura of Macho Man.
Michaels didn't find his way until like 8 years in and still that was wrong since Razor and Taker were hotter.
Michaels didn't find his way until like 8 years in and still that was wrong since Razor and Taker were hotter.
Last edited:
Jmare007
pico pal q lee
This.
Michaels run was pretty damn impressive, even though I was never the biggest fan of his matches, dude could always have an entertaining match. Savage didn't have much in wCw (ring-wise) besides his Flair and DDP feud, dude was beyond hit or miss during that run.
But even though Shawn was more consistent during his career, he never reached the levels of Savage when he was ON, Randy was almost untouchable during his peak and that thing lasted pretty much a decade. What is available of him from ICW and CWA is already impressive and then dude goes to the WWF and keeps having
performances. He gave Warrior and Hogan (and maybe Ronnie Garvin) the best matches of their careers, I don't think Michaels carried dudes that had that kinda level to the heights Mach did.HBK did have some standout performances and he does have legit classics, but to me he's not close to peak Savage. fukk, point me to a match were Shawn can do what Randy (and Sherri) did in the Tenryu match from the All Japan/WWF Tokyo Dome show. The only thing I see Michaels having a legit advantage is being a better tag team wrestler.
To me it is. Savage smokes Michaels.
In what way? Drawing wise is not even a discussion. shyt, Savage was main eventing house shows on 85', almost three years before his main event push. Dude had enough of a name that the company had the trust in him to headline house shows while Vince was taking over every territory (something a very select few did at that time). And his Macho Madness run shyt's on Michael's "ace" run.
In the ring I already pointed it out that to me, Savage's strengths are at a level that overcome Shawn's consistency.
Does Mania III and IV eclipse Mania XIX, XXV and XXVI?
there are questions to be answered
I don't understand that question regarding a Michaels vs Savage discussion
Are you talking about performance from each guy at those shows?
Yes.I don't understand that question regarding a Michaels vs Savage discussion
Poff by a fairly large margin.
You aren't counting Mania X and XII?
The ladder match at X is one of the most influential matches in the annals of wrestling
Michaels was never really a likable babyface until his comeback, Savage made guys like Roberts and Flair great heels by how well he told either beatdowns or how mad his promos were when Liz was involved.
I just chose two mania matches breh...savages match with warrior was a goat finish too so it goes both ways dont overthink it
Jmare007
pico pal q lee
Then why not use WM V or VII or VIII for Savage? Them Hogan, Warrior, Flair matches
Or WM XXIV for Michaels? To me that's one of his most impressive performances. Flair himself admitted that match was all Shawn. The way he structured that match and the story it told
But anyways. XIX, XXV and XXVI are better than IV. But III beats XIX and XXVI, and it's neck and neck with XXV for me.
Kill Dat Noize
Banned
honestly i think it could go either way.
anyone saying it isn't close is crazy.
they're on the same tier IMO.
anyone saying it isn't close is crazy.
they're on the same tier IMO.