All my PAWG, Latina & Asian loving brethren.. go to twitter and search "black guys" (no homo) :whoa:

[PartyHeart]

I actually read this back and forth between these two, Gravity gave her that work

You and him are just the same. Hate Black women, would never be caught dead coming to our defense in a sea of sambos who recite white racist rhetoric about Black women day in and day out on here, but have an issue when a Black feminist does come to our own defense and calls out anti-Black female Black men like yourselves.

Nobody is surprised that you'd fix your fingers to type that lie, but everyone can clearly see his every post has been nonsensical and he has only taken his position out of ego/emotion and not at all out of rational thought. Again, just like you.

 

[Gifted one]

You and him are just the same. Hate Black women, would never be caught dead coming to our defense in a sea of sambos who recite white racist rhetoric about Black women day in and day out on here, but have an issue when a Black feminist does come to our own defense and calls out anti-Black female Black men like yourselves.

Nobody is surprised that you'd fix your fingers to type that lie, but everyone can clearly see his every post has been nonsensical and he has only taken his position out of ego/emotion and not at all out of rational thought. Again, just like you.

I hate black women but the woman I will date and will have children with will be BlackBerry, you're a feminist so your views are already flawed, your argument is with @Gravity not me, you don't know anything about my life and the help I do in my community to help black men and women so miss me with that hate black women mess

 

[PartyHeart]

I hate black women but the woman I will date and will have children with will be BlackBerry, you're a feminist so your views are already flawed, your argument is with @Gravity not me, you don't know anything about my life and the help I do in my community to help black men and women so miss me with that hate black women mess

Yeah, I'm sure you'd love to date and have children with any Black women who was as against her rights as a woman as you are, just like white people love when they can find a Black person who agrees with their anti-Black sentiment.

 

[Gifted one]

Yeah, I'm sure you'd love to date and have children with any Black women who was as against her rights as a woman as you are, just like white people love when they can find a Black person who agrees with their anti-Black sentiment.

You seriously looking for anything to argue about, but I'll let you keep making assumptions

 

[Gravity]

The stupidity

White women are choosing non-white men in greater number than ever before around the world. That includes Black men.

While I don't know the exact numbers I do know that whites date outside of their race extremely low rates. So it maybe true that white women are with non white men more now than ever before, but it's still at a low rate. My position is that white women choosing non white men at a high rate would be a threat to white supremacy.

The racist white man who owns the Clippers organization saw and treated his Black male employees like slaves.
How come white women choosing all those Black basketball players who lap after them like animals did not topple his myth of superiority? He viewed his Black tenants like dogs, and I'm sure he's around a great number of the wealthy Black men who white women choose to make partners--including the coach of his team--how come this did not influence his racist thoughts? Because according to you, white supremacy is clearly all founded in white male hurt feelings, so why didn't his hurt feelings crush him into believing Black men are equal to him?

Pro athletes choose from endless amounts of women who make themselves available to them, not the other way around. White women are lapping around pro black athletes like dogs hoping to be chosen, not the other way around. Stop allowing your bitter bytchiness fukk with your logic and common sense.

You bringing up the Donald Sterling story proves my point. While I don't agree that Sterling treated the players like slaves he certainly has a slave master mentality and that goes back to my original point about white men. Just because a white man chooses to be with a black woman doesn't mean that he isn't a white supremacist. Your point here is completely invalid because Sterling is obviously insecure and threatened by black men. He like all other white men like him sees the white women who are with his black players and other black athletes as trash. Sterling didn't even want his blaxican "girlfriend" to be seen associated with black men so you know how he feels about white women who do so. He didn't even want his little blaxican chic to be seen associated with a "magic accepted negro" like Magic Johnson. This Sterling story perfectly illustrates/validates my point in this thread. It's shows how a lot of black women must completely sell themselves and their race out to be with a white man because most white men will only choose a black or non white woman if she's a sell out willing to perpetuate the status quo which is white male supremacy. Why can't you see things for what they are? Are you that blinded by envy/hate?

The reality: You have absolutely zero concept of what white supremacy is, and you should be ashamed of the fact that you have carried on this long acting as if you do.

the reality that you're a fukking idiot who doesn't even understand the simplest of concepts. You should be too ashamed to continue responding(damn near took your dumbass a month)because you're getting your ass beat senseless in this debate.

And yet in this day in age, with no lynchings as a threat, and IR mixing happening freely between white women and Black men, you can still find a Black child shot dead in the street and face no punishment. You can still find harsher punishments for the same crime of Black offenders than white, and you can still find whites having the majority of the wealth with Blacks having the least, and Blacks still having the least employment prospects even when they are just as qualified as other candidates, and on and on and on. Isn't that strange? Everything is just the same as it was when lynchings were prevalent and white women and Black men didn't mix as they are now when they do .

What a shame your brilliant plan to sex the white supremacy out of white women isn't working

I've said nothing about having a plan to "sex the white supremacy out of white women". That's your bitter, simpleminded sub 80 IQ understanding of what I'm saying. I'll repeat my position for people reading since you are he'll bent on trying to cloud the issue and misrepresent my position. My position is this, the dynamics regarding wm-bw and bm-ww aren't the same.

As far at the stupid shyt you posted above you can't be serious. Just because black men aren't being lynched for looking at white women the "wrong" way anymore doesn't mean that it's all good for IR mixing. I keep telling ppl that you black feminists sound just like white supremacists. You're making the same argument that white racists make to dodge responsibility for the role that their system of racism has in the state of the black community. "well slavery is over, racial discrimination is illegal, and you no longer have to ride the back of the bus so what's the problem? Racism is over". White women still face a definite backlash from white men in their community for choosing non white males and this contributes to the fact that white women don't seek non white males at any kind of significant rate. Again, you problem is that you're too stupid to understand my position here even though I keep dumbing it down for you. My position here is that white women choosing non white males(especially black men) in SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS would threaten white male supremacy. Only 2% of white women are married to non white males as even less than that married to black men. So while your insecurity and bitterness causes you to think that there are all these bm-ww couples running around out here the reality is that there really aren't all that many. You're 0-2 so far.

Yes, because I'm sure if Black women started calling Black men southern tree decorations, recalling on the horrors of Black men being lynched just because we had hurt feelings over them dating IR, it would go over so well with you. You'd just consider us calling out the behavior, like you do when you call Black women bed wenches and draw on our historical rape, right?

"southern tree decorations" isn't a term. The term that was used to describe black men that were lynched in this country was "******". Terms like c00n, Tom, house ******, ect are also all just as derogatory and associated with slavery as the term bed wench so no your fake outrage over "bed wench" isn't justified. Whether you choose to realize it or not all "bed wenches" weren't raped. Not to mention the fact that "bed wenching" continued on long after slavery ended. Again, all you're trying to do is deflect from the actual bed wench behavior that exists amongst some black women(probably you). It's so funny that you talked about the Sterling story not realizing that it proves my point in every way to a T. This V Stiviano chic is a true to life modern day bed wench. She is undeniable proof that there are women out here who will sell themselves and their race out to get down with white men and their system of supremacy. You can't sit up here and whine about the term bed wench being used when there's women like Stiviano out here.

Like I said, you are pro-Black male and absolutely anti-Black female. The only time anyone would ever catch you or any other of the rest of you fake coli militants saying anything positive about Black women it would only be because you believe it edifies Black men in the process. Otherwise, you'd like to see us subdued as much as humanly possible, and I'm glad Black Feminism exists so that we will NEVER allow you boot licking, white skin worshipping sambos to let it happen. Go find your white women to mate with so that you can do your job to "topple white supremacy" and seethe on that fact.

Just because you run your pathetically dumbass up here and type something doesn't make it true. I'm not going to argue against being some fictionally man that you've made up in your little head. You sound delusional.

Lol I am neither bitter nor manless or lonely, and nothing I've said could be construed as such.

I disagree. It's only logical to conclude that you're bitter, man-less, and lonely judging by your posts. You're probably ugly as fukk too. You definitely have an ugly ass personality from what I can see.

After all, I'm not the one online making logical leap after logical leap to suggest that someone of the opposite sex of a different race liking me and my kind would equal freedom. You're pathetic.

In your effort to be sarcastic you seem to have overlooked the fact that you don't know what "logical" means. I assume that you meant to accuse me of making "illogical leaps". You try hard, I'll give you that. Your stupidity is one thing but your dishonesty is just inexcusable. I've made no such "white women liking black men would equal freedom" leap. My position is much more complexed than the simpleminded shyt you keep trying to attribute to me but you're just too stupid to get it. I've repeated my position over and over but it's not my daily that you're not smart enough to comprehend.

 

[Gravity]

If anyone is hurting for attention from the opposite sex its clearly you, and you know this. Never in my life have I seen someone so desperate for validation that they'd make the retarded claim that they can uplift their race by marrying and procreating with another one

You tell these blatant lies because you have no integrity and you don't have the intellect to do any better. You can't quote me saying "you can uplift your race by marrying and procreating with white women" because I've never said that. You can quote me saying "a black person can't be pro black with a non black mate" because I've said that over and over. You ignore what I'm dating to argue against this straw man that you've created in your head because that's all that your minimal intelligence allows. It's clear that you don't possess tw mental capacity to truly engage so ima have to think about even reading the other 2 posts.

 

[PartyHeart]

While I don't know the exact numbers I do know that whites date outside of their race extremely low rates. So it maybe true that white women are with non white men more now than ever before, but it's still at a low rate. My position is that white women choosing non white men at a high rate would be a threat to white supremacy.

You're not very bright. Even in the increase of more white women marrying out, there have been no significant movements that one could say have been a thwart to white supremacy.

Pro athletes choose from endless amounts of women who make themselves available to them, not the other way around. White women are lapping around pro black athletes like dogs hoping to be chosen, not the other way around. Stop allowing your bitter bytchiness fukk with your logic and common sense.

Andre Drummond.

You bringing up the Donald Sterling story proves my point. While I don't agree that Sterling treated the players like slaves he certainly has a slave master mentality and that goes back to my original point about white men. Just because a white man chooses to be with a black woman doesn't mean that he isn't a white supremacist.

Right. But remember, you're the only person here who thinks who a person sleeps with ultimately effects white supremacy. No one here is dumb or insecure enough to say that aloud and think they are correct except you, remember?

Your point here is completely invalid because Sterling is obviously insecure and threatened by black men. He like all other white men like him sees the white women who are with his black players and other black athletes as trash. Sterling didn't even want his blaxican "girlfriend" to be seen associated with black men so you know how he feels about white women who do so. He didn't even want his little blaxican chic to be seen associated with a "magic accepted negro" like Magic Johnson. This Sterling story perfectly illustrates/validates my point in this thread. It's shows how a lot of black women must completely sell themselves and their race out to be with a white man because most white men will only choose a black or non white woman if she's a sell out willing to perpetuate the status quo which is white male supremacy. Why can't you see things for what they are? Are you that blinded by envy/hate?

One of the stupidest paragraphs I've seen on this website and that's saying a lot. Again, you are the only person who is making the claim that who a white person sleeps with can ultimately be a blow to white supremacy. Not me. So that entire thing is some straw man you set up and that really refutes YOUR logic and not my own.

I have never been desperate enough for white validation in any way to believe that them finding Black people sexually attractive, or even just them finding one Black person whom they deem marriageable, necessitates them caring about dismantling white supremacy. I have never needed to create some silver lining for my want to feel desirable to them or to not feel like a c00n while lusting for them like yourself.

On top of that, I see historical evidence of the rape of Black women by white men while they enforced white supremacy that these two things (attraction/marriage and white supremacy) are two separate issues. I have seen enough historical evidence of the ordered lynching and dismembering of Black men by white women, even while they lusted after their Black bodies, to know these are two separate issues. I have seen enough evidence of white women and men TOGETHER objectifying Black men, with white men making a Black man play "buck" to their own wives who too viewed Black men as animals but they still slept with as a fetish. I have seen them do the same together in objectifying Black women, such as with Venus Hottentot and countless others.

You desperately want white women choosing you to mean more than them seeing you as a sexual object at worst or as a life partner at best. You desperately want it to mean something radical and political when it has absolutely no effect on their leanings in a broader sense whatsoever. Or at least you want it to be viewed that way. Because I find it hard to believe anyone is dense enough to legitimately believe the idiocy you are spouting, especially since I've already thoroughly broken your horrendous logic down several times.

I'm much more likely to believe you trying to make white women dating black men some type of civil rights movement is more about ego and your want to be seen as desirable, and you know deep down it has zero effect on white patriarchy power and white supremacy in general.

the reality that you're a fukking idiot who doesn't even understand the simplest of concepts. You should be too ashamed to continue responding(damn near took your dumbass a month)because you're getting your ass beat senseless in this debate.

I didn't reply because I have a life. Sorry you don't know what this feels like, but getting on the internet to reply to morons like yourself who think changing sexual/dating patterns is the cure for social ills is not on the top of my list of things to do

Btw, there is no concept to be understood. It seems you are too stupid to realize that the issue you are trying really hard to simplify into who dates who (the stupidity ) is actually far more complex than what your mind can handle.

 

[PartyHeart]

You tell these blatant lies because you have no integrity and you don't have the intellect to do any better. You can't quote me saying "you can uplift your race by marrying and procreating with white women" because I've never said that. You can quote me saying "a black person can't be pro black with a non black mate" because I've said that over and over.

Right, but you were dumb enough to say this:

Yes, I'm telling you that if white women started choosing non white men in significant numbers that would damage and eventually topple the white male system of supremacy.

so ima have to think about even reading the other 2 posts.

I wouldn't want to read further if I was having my ass handed to me in a debate like you are, too

 

[Gravity]

You're not very bright. Even in the increase of more white women marrying out, there have been no significant movements that one could say have been a thwart to white supremacy.

Only 2% of white women are married to non white men dumbfukk.

Andre Drummond.

Yes, Drummond sent out a bullshyt tweet about some random tv white broad and the white broad came a running.

Right. But remember, you're the only person here who thinks who a person sleeps with ultimately effects white supremacy. No one here is dumb or insecure enough to say that aloud and think they are correct except you, remember?

My position isn't about "a person" dumbass it's about people in significant numbers. You're simply too stupid to get it.

I don't relate to that insecure shyt and couldn't care less about cosigns.

One of the stupidest paragraphs I've seen on this website and that's saying a lot. Again, you are the only person who is making the claim that who a white person sleeps with can ultimately be a blow to white supremacy. Not me. So that entire thing is some straw man you set up and that really refutes YOUR logic and not my own.

I have never been desperate enough for white validation in any way to believe that them finding Black people sexually attractive, or even just them finding one Black person whom they deem marriageable, necessitates them caring about dismantling white supremacy. I have never needed to create some silver lining for my want to feel desirable to them or to not feel like a c00n while lusting for them like yourself.

On top of that, I see historical evidence of the rape of Black women by white men while they enforced white supremacy that these two things (attraction/marriage and white supremacy) are two separate issues. I have seen enough historical evidence of the ordered lynching and dismembering of Black men by white women, even while they lusted after their Black bodies, to know these are two separate issues. I have seen enough evidence of white women and men TOGETHER objectifying Black men, with white men making a Black man play "buck" to their own wives who too viewed Black men as animals but they still slept with as a fetish. I have seen them do the same together in objectifying Black women, such as with Venus Hottentot and countless others.

You desperately want white women choosing you to mean more than them seeing you as a sexual object at worst or as a life partner at best. You desperately want it to mean something radical and political when it has absolutely no effect on their leanings in a broader sense whatsoever. Or at least you want it to be viewed that way. Because I find it hard to believe anyone is dense enough to legitimately believe the idiocy you are spouting, especially since I've already thoroughly broken your horrendous logic down several times.

I'm much more likely to believe you trying to make white women dating black men some type of civil rights movement is more about ego and your want to be seen as desirable, and you know deep down it has zero effect on white patriarchy power and white supremacy in general.

You're simply too stupid to get it. You're arguing against yourself here not against anything that I've actually said. My position is(in the simplest way i can put it) that white women choosing non white men in significant numbers would threaten the system of white supremacy because they're genetically inferior. My position doesn't have anything to do with that dumb shyt that you insist upon going on and on about. The reason that white men go so hard against their women who do marry/mate outside their race is because they recognize the threat that it poses. Being the majority plays a big part in how whites maintain their system of supremacy. Whites have gone to great lengths to control the black and other non white populations for a reason. If white women started getting with non white men in significant numbers then that would reduce the white population. It would also contradict the myth that whites are superior.You're not arguing against those points. You're arguing against shyt that you've got going on in your own head.

 

[Brandeezy]

God damn, it's like reading a novel up in here

 

[PartyHeart]

Only 2% of white women are married to non white men dumbfukk....Being the majority plays a big part in how whites maintain their system of supremacy. Whites have gone to great lengths to control the black and other non white populations for a reason.

Look at you proving you don't even understand percentages vs real numbers. You do realize that what is 2% of them would account for a far higher percentage amongst other races? They are the majority you idiot. Acknowledging this only weakens the poor point you attempted to make before about "dismantling" white supremacy via Black men sleeping with/marrying white women. 10% of their population is like 30% of yours. They might engulf your population entirely before you even got to half of theirs, but you will dismantle their power structure by gaining numbers on them? You will dismantle their power structure by breeding yourself out and having your children follow in your footsteps and marry who will still be the majority and dilute you out even further?? Lol. Ok.

Yes, Drummond sent out a bullshyt tweet about some random tv white broad and the white broad came a running.

You will literally say whatever lie you need to to make yourself feel better. I'm dying laughing.

You're simply too stupid to get it. You're arguing against yourself here not against anything that I've actually said. My position is(in the simplest way i can put it) that white women choosing non white men in significant numbers would threaten the system of white supremacy because they're genetically inferior. My position doesn't have anything to do with that dumb shyt that you insist upon going on and on about. The reason that white men go so hard against their women who do marry/mate outside their race is because they recognize the threat that it poses..... If white women started getting with non white men in significant numbers then that would reduce the white population. It would also contradict the myth that whites are superior.You're not arguing against those points. You're arguing against shyt that you've got going on in your own head.

You continuously explaining your "position" (see: pathetic display of insecurity) as many times as you like doesn't make it any less stupid. I've already dismantled your plea to "hurt feelings" by displaying how the men go so hard against their women in every race for dating out, yet none but white men can claim to have any worldwide supremacy to protect. Women too go hard at men of their own race who date/marry out (although we lack the male privilege for it to be as thorough) and we certainly don't have any systematic supremacy to shield. Going hard at the opposite sex of your race choosing another instead of someone like you is a natural cultural group reaction, it is not some indication of a wider political agenda.

Secondly, I've already proven that your idea, even if it were true, would be more true for the reverse type of relationship (WM & BW) according to your logic. Somehow white men choosing Black women wouldn't contradict the myth that whites are superior, and Black men choosing white women somehow would not reinforce it. It only works the opposite way. The way that nets you more attention from other races of women, and less competition for your own. How convenient for you You still haven't been able to give real life examples or even explain how your strange "position" would somehow apply to BM/WW relationships toppling white supremacy but be impossible for BW/WM relationships, despite your insistence that white MEN are the only ones with true belief in white supremacy (not white women..smh) and all of the power and influence in it to boot.

Finally, I've already proven several times over that the idea isn't true period and doesn't make sense anyway, most recently by giving you the example of the boom and growing international power/sway in Asian countries despite their women increasingly "confirming white supremacy" by choosing white men (because that's all your feeble mind can categorize white supremacy as, whether other races of women choose to sleep with white men or not). Furthermore, and if only you weren't so hard up for Black men receiving non-Black approval because of your obviously low personal self worth, you'd realize how stupid of an idea it is just by even shallowly thinking about what you're saying. Even homosexuals would be insulted at someone whittling down their struggle to the inability to marry, but here you are seriously hinging centuries of oppression and its elimination on Black men getting themselves a white woman. Absolutely pathetic.

There is not one argument you have made in all your long, insult hurling, grasping at straws diatribes that has made logical sense or refuted anything I said at the very beginning. You can keep lying to yourself in whatever ways you need to to ignore reality, or to even make yourself feel that you are winning this debate, but you're not and your point is delusional to put it best. Your ideas are idiotic and you are getting your ass handed to you because you have not been able to take your emotion out of it and use logic since the very beginning of our conversation.

 

[Gravity]

Look at you proving you don't even understand percentages vs real numbers. You do realize that what is 2% of them would account for a far higher percentage amongst other races? They are the majority you idiot.

This completely irrelevant to anything that I've said which isn't surprising seeing as how you still don't comprehend my point. You''ve literally been arguing against yourself here the entire time. I'm just pointing and laughing at your stupid ass at this point.

My position here is that a significant number of white women being with non white men would threaten white supremacy. The dumb shyt that you just posted has nothing to do with that point. I'm flying over your empty ass head.

Acknowledging this only weakens the poor point you attempted to make before about "dismantling" white supremacy via Black men sleeping with/marrying white women.

That's not my point and I haven't even used the word "dismantle" one time in our entire exchange so I have no idea why you put the word in quotation marks. Actually I do have an idea. You're a gotdamn delusional idiot who can't deal with I'm actually saying so you are relegated to arguing with your own dumbass self.

10% of their population is like 30% of yours. They might engulf your population entirely before you even got to half of theirs, but you will dismantle their power structure by gaining numbers on them? You will dismantle their power structure by breeding yourself out and having your children follow in your footsteps and marry who will still be the majority and dilute you out even further?? Lol. Ok.

My position is about white women being with non white men not just black men. While whites are the majority, they are genetically inferior and they understand this even if stupid motherfukkers like you don't. When a white woman has children with a non white man the children aren't considered white. Lol the idea of children with non white men as fathers being white themselves. White women who go outside the white race are usually disowned from the white community and their children are never accpeted. You're so clueless and ignorant to how this society works I wonder how you function.

You will literally say whatever lie you need to to make yourself feel better. I'm dying laughing.

Its a shame that you can't do any better than this. You should be ashamed. I would ask your slack jawed ass to point out what I lied about, but if I were really lying you would've just exposed the lie instead of postin this empty ass trying too hard comment. All Drummond did was pick the white chic for one of his WCW and she came and got at him after finding out about it. Stop allowing your bitterness and resentment of black men to distort your view of reality.

You continuously explaining your "position" (see: pathetic display of insecurity) as many times as you like doesn't make it any less stupid. I've already dismantled your plea to "hurt feelings" by displaying how the men go so hard against their women in every race for dating out, yet none but white men can claim to have any worldwide supremacy to protect. Women too go hard at men of their own race who date/marry out (although we lack the male privilege for it to be as thorough) and we certainly don't have any systematic supremacy to shield. Going hard at the opposite sex of your race choosing another instead of someone like you is a natural cultural group reaction, it is not some indication of a wider political agenda.

Wow, here you are straight up defending white men. Doesn't take much to bring the bed wench out of most black feminists. Stop jumping your c00n ass in front of your white massas trying to save them from these bullets, they don't need(or want) you. You trying to equate black men with white men regarding being opposed to their race of women going outside of the race is despicable. Black men have never gone to the extremes that white men have gone to in effort to prevent black eomen from going outside if their race. History is proof of this and it speaks for itself. You're either ignorant or completely indifferent to history. Either way yous a dumb bytch.

Secondly, I've already proven that your idea, even if it were true, would be more true for the reverse type of relationship (WM & BW) according to your logic.

Your illogical stupidass posts hardly serve as proof of anything other than you being a gotdamn idiot who cant follow my logic. You have yet to post one valid retort to anything that I've said. You're 0-everything you dumb bytch.

Somehow white men choosing Black women wouldn't contradict the myth that whites are superior, and Black men choosing white women somehow would not reinforce it. It only works the opposite way. The way that nets you more attention from other races of women, and less competition for your own. How convenient for you

It's not about convenience you insecure pathetic fukk, it's about logic and common sense. Reality serves as proof of what I'm saying you and you obviously have a problem dealing with reality. You acknowledge that this is a white male patriarchal society yet you refuse to acknowledge the differences between white men and women regarding the positions/roles that they play in this society. This Sterling story proves everything I'm saying here. Did Sterling having a little blaxican bed wench contradict the system/culture of white supremacy that he's so hell bent on maintaining? No. His little bed wench being seen associating with black men did contradict that culture though. I'm trying to explain why that is to your stupid ass but you aren't capable of comprehending due to your insecurity and bytchiness.

You still haven't been able to give real life examples or even explain how your strange "position" would somehow apply to BM/WW relationships toppling white supremacy but be impossible for BW/WM relationships, despite your insistence that white MEN are the only ones with true belief in white supremacy (not white women..smh) and all of the power and influence in it to boot.

This Sterling story is a real life example of everything I've said in this thread. My position isn't even just about black and white but that's your focus because you obviously have an agenda. I suspect that you've been left by a brother for some white chic or whatever and that's why you're so irrationally butt-hurt over what I'm saying. It's not just about bm-ww couples toppling white supremacy. I've never said that, that's just your dumbed down interpretation of what I'm saying. I'll repeat again for your stupid ass. My position is that if white women started getting with non white men in significant numbers it would threaten the system of white supremacy. Would the system be threatened if the scenario was reversed and white men started getting with non white women in significant numbers? Absolutely. There's no chance of that happening though because white men understand the threat that choosing non white women in significant numbers would pose to their position of dominance in this society. Sure white men lust after and will keep black women and other non white women as bed wenches and such but they're never going to "wife" non white women in significant numbers because non white women can't produce white children. This is why bed wenches are no threat to white supremacy and are actually agents working to perpetuate it. Obviously white women with black or other non white men can still have racist ways and a lot of white but the act of a white woman choosing a non white man is a direct rejection of white male supremacy. You also need to acknowledge that women usually follow the man that they choose to be with not the other way around.

Finally, I've already proven several times over that the idea isn't true period and doesn't make sense anyway, most recently by giving you the example of the boom and growing international power/sway in Asian countries despite their women increasingly "confirming white supremacy" by choosing white men (because that's all your feeble mind can categorize white supremacy as, whether other races of women choose to sleep with white men or not).

Asian women in Asian countries aren't choosing white men you stupidass bytch. The Asian women choosing white men are the ones in white countries. The nerve of your incredibly dumb ass trying to speak for me. You're literally the dumbest motherfukker that I've encountered in awhile and that's the only thing that you've proven.

Furthermore, and if only you weren't so hard up for Black men receiving non-Black approval because of your obviously low personal self worth, you'd realize how stupid of an idea it is just by even shallowly thinking about what you're saying. Even homosexuals would be insulted at someone whittling down their struggle to the inability to marry, but here you are seriously hinging centuries of oppression and its elimination on Black men getting themselves a white woman. Absolutely pathetic.

You're arguing against yourself not against anything that I've actually said. I'm simply laughing at your stupid ass.

There is not one argument you have made in all your long, insult hurling, grasping at straws diatribes that has made logical sense or refuted anything I said at the very beginning. You can keep lying to yourself in whatever ways you need to to ignore reality, or to even make yourself feel that you are winning this debate, but you're not and your point is delusional to put it best. Your ideas are idiotic and you are getting your ass handed to you because you have not been able to take your emotion out of it and use logic since the very beginning of our conversation.

Says the dumb bytch who still doesn't comprehend my one and only argument in this discussion. You STILL don't get it We should really end this because we're just going in circles at this point. You're going to keep posting dumb shyt that has nothing do with what I'm saying and I'm going to keep calling you out for being a gotdamn idiot.

 

[PartyHeart]

This completely irrelevant to anything that I've said which isn't surprising seeing as how you still don't comprehend my point. You''ve literally been arguing against yourself here the entire time. I'm just pointing and laughing at your stupid ass at this point.

My position here is that a significant number of white women being with non white men would threaten white supremacy. The dumb shyt that you just posted has nothing to do with that point. I'm flying over your empty ass head.

That's not my point and I haven't even used the word "dismantle" one time in our entire exchange so I have no idea why you put the word in quotation marks. Actually I do have an idea. You're a gotdamn delusional idiot who can't deal with I'm actually saying so you are relegated to arguing with your own dumbass self.

My position is about white women being with non white men not just black men. While whites are the majority, they are genetically inferior and they understand this even if stupid motherfukkers like you don't. When a white woman has children with a non white man the children aren't considered white. Lol the idea of children with non white men as fathers being white themselves. White women who go outside the white race are usually disowned from the white community and their children are never accpeted. You're so clueless and ignorant to how this society works I wonder how you function.

Its a shame that you can't do any better than this. You should be ashamed. I would ask your slack jawed ass to point out what I lied about, but if I were really lying you would've just exposed the lie instead of postin this empty ass trying too hard comment. All Drummond did was pick the white chic for one of his WCW and she came and got at him after finding out about it. Stop allowing your bitterness and resentment of black men to distort your view of reality.

Wow, here you are straight up defending white men. Doesn't take much to bring the bed wench out of most black feminists. Stop jumping your c00n ass in front of your white massas trying to save them from these bullets, they don't need(or want) you. You trying to equate black men with white men regarding being opposed to their race of women going outside of the race is despicable. Black men have never gone to the extremes that white men have gone to in effort to prevent black eomen from going outside if their race. History is proof of this and it speaks for itself. You're either ignorant or completely indifferent to history. Either way yous a dumb bytch.

Your illogical stupidass posts hardly serve as proof of anything other than you being a gotdamn idiot who cant follow my logic. You have yet to post one valid retort to anything that I've said. You're 0-everything you dumb bytch.

It's not about convenience you insecure pathetic fukk, it's about logic and common sense. Reality serves as proof of what I'm saying you and you obviously have a problem dealing with reality. You acknowledge that this is a white male patriarchal society yet you refuse to acknowledge the differences between white men and women regarding the positions/roles that they play in this society. This Sterling story proves everything I'm saying here. Did Sterling having a little blaxican bed wench contradict the system/culture of white supremacy that he's so hell bent on maintaining? No. His little bed wench being seen associating with black men did contradict that culture though. I'm trying to explain why that is to your stupid ass but you aren't capable of comprehending due to your insecurity and bytchiness.

This Sterling story is a real life example of everything I've said in this thread. My position isn't even just about black and white but that's your focus because you obviously have an agenda. I suspect that you've been left by a brother for some white chic or whatever and that's why you're so irrationally butt-hurt over what I'm saying. It's not just about bm-ww couples toppling white supremacy. I've never said that, that's just your dumbed down interpretation of what I'm saying. I'll repeat again for your stupid ass. My position is that if white women started getting with non white men in significant numbers it would threaten the system of white supremacy. Would the system be threatened if the scenario was reversed and white men started getting with non white women in significant numbers? Absolutely. There's no chance of that happening though because white men understand the threat that choosing non white women in significant numbers would pose to their position of dominance in this society. Sure white men lust after and will keep black women and other non white women as bed wenches and such but they're never going to "wife" non white women in significant numbers because non white women can't produce white children. This is why bed wenches are no threat to white supremacy and are actually agents working to perpetuate it. Obviously white women with black or other non white men can still have racist ways and a lot of white but the act of a white woman choosing a non white man is a direct rejection of white male supremacy. You also need to acknowledge that women usually follow the man that they choose to be with not the other way around.

Asian women in Asian countries aren't choosing white men you stupidass bytch. The Asian women choosing white men are the ones in white countries. The nerve of your incredibly dumb ass trying to speak for me. You're literally the dumbest motherfukker that I've encountered in awhile and that's the only thing that you've proven.

You're arguing against yourself not against anything that I've actually said. I'm simply laughing at your stupid ass.

Says the dumb bytch who still doesn't comprehend my one and only argument in this discussion. You STILL don't get it We should really end this because we're just going in circles at this point. You're going to keep posting dumb shyt that has nothing do with what I'm saying and I'm going to keep calling you out for being a gotdamn idiot.

You once again wrote all that drivel attempting to insult me but never once actually addressed the points I made, which were full of facts in comparison to you ad-hominems, hurt feelings, and outright lies. And look at you eventually going against what you originally said and what this entire argument was originally about because you KNOW I was/am thoroughly shredding your logic and forced you to see how stupid it was. You had no choice but to admit there is no possible way you could be dumb enough to believe one side of the coin and not the other unless you were pandering for attention from white women and the "okaying" of BM/WW, but wanted to set a different, more negative standard to deny the "okay-ness" of Black women with white men.

Furthering your essential admittance to me dominating you in this debate, you're now trying to claim you've been talking about non-white men as a whole when no other men but Black were EVER mentioned in any of your other posts until I destroyed the stupidity of you reasoning. You're trying to say women choosing white men is confirming white supremacy, yet Asian women IN AMERICA pair with white men more than any other female group and the men and women of their race outearn white men and women on average And I caught how you are dumb enough to suggest that white supremacy is strictly an American thing too, by pretending what happens in other countries doesn't matter, but I think I already have enough ammo to prove your stupidity than to even delve into that.

Btw, in America, Asians are also less targeted in regards to the criminal justice system, their family structure in tact when they do date within, and their wealth and ownership is on the rise. I am sooooo excited to hear the new retarded theory you cook up to avoid this fact and continue to try to tie white supremacy with sexual selection though.

The bolded is a key example of how low your self esteem really is, and how much your Blackness is the cause of it sadly. You are really putting it on display. I mean, you just got through telling me a page or so back that a Black child can be created in a white womb, but you are adamant in the idea that whites must come from a white womb. So its either, you are very obviously anti-Black female or you have a very low opinion of what it means to be Black, or both. I'm betting on the last option. Funny enough, you hate the system of white supremacy so much, want to supposedly dismantle it, but advocate to Black men the opposite of what you perceive white men are doing to maintain it You say white men are smart enough to not 'wife' non-Black women, but here you are advocating Black men sleep with and 'wife' white women because doing what white men wouldn't be dumb enough to do, would somehow work against them and not for them if Black men did it....

Finally, the enlarged point entirely goes against what you said at the beginning, where you claimed Black men with white women could hurt white supremacy, and Black women with white men could never do the same. Now you are saying both can. The only really stupid excuse you are trying to give to disguise your blatant backtracking, is adding other non-white people to the mix (something you also weren't doing at the beginning of this debate). Terrible.

It has become extremely obvious you don't know what the hell you're talking about and never have. Again, you were arguing from a place of ego and never from a place of accuracy (especially in relation to white supremacy and its workings).

 

[Gravity]

You once again wrote all that drivel attempting to insult me but never once actually addressed the points I made, which were full of facts in comparison to you ad-hominems, hurt feelings, and outright lies.

You haven't made one factual point that refutes what I've said here. Not one. Yous a silly dumb bytch. That's not ad hominem attack it's an obvious observation.

And look at you eventually going against what you originally said and what this entire argument was originally about because you KNOW I was/am thoroughly shredding your logic and forced you to see how stupid it was. You had no choice but to admit there is no possible way you could be dumb enough to believe one side of the coin and not the other unless you were pandering for attention from white women and the "okaying" of BM/WW, but wanted to set a different, more negative standard to deny the "okay-ness" of Black women with white men.

I haven't gone back in anything that I've said. In fact, your stupidity had caused me to repeat myself over at over and over proving that I haven't gone back on anything. You'll lie quicker than a cat can lick it's ass. You'll literally say anything.

Furthering your essential admittance to me dominating you in this debate, you're now trying to claim you've been talking about non-white men as a whole when no other men but Black were EVER mentioned in any of your other posts until I destroyed the stupidity of you reasoning.

Between you being a gotdamn idiot who doesn't read or comprehend too well and you being a pathetic liar, you hardly ever speak the truth

I'm simply acknowledging the FACT that this is a white male patriarchal society that's based onthe myth of white male superiority. A select few white men choosing to be black women doesn't threaten that myth for the same reasons that slave masters raping black female slaves didn't threaten slavery. On the flip side though, white women choosing non white men(black men especially) does threaten the myth that white men are superior. What's so difficult to understand?

That post is from April 10th over a month ago you lying ass bytch. The fukk is wrong with you?

You're trying to say women choosing white men is confirming white supremacy, yet Asian women IN AMERICA pair with white men more than any other female group and the men and women of their race outearn white men and women on average

So the fukk what dumbass the Asian women who put white men on a pedastal chasing them are perpetuating white male supremacy as well.

And I caught how you are dumb enough to suggest that white supremacy is strictly an American thing too, by pretending what happens in other countries doesn't matter, but I think I already have enough ammo to prove your stupidity than to even delve into that.

I've suggested no such thing you lying ass bytch. White supremacy exists anywhere white people are significant numbers. What I said to you is that Asian women in Asian countries don't chase white men.

Btw, in America, Asians are also less targeted in regards to the criminal justice system, their family structure in tact when they do date within, and their wealth and ownership is on the rise. I am sooooo excited to hear the new retarded theory you cook up to avoid this fact and continue to try to tie white supremacy with sexual selection though.

So the fukk what? What is your point here?

The bolded is a key example of how low your self esteem really is, and how much your Blackness is the cause of it sadly. You are really putting it on display. I mean, you just got through telling me a page or so back that a Black child can be created in a white womb, but you are adamant in the idea that whites must come from a white womb. So its either, you are very obviously anti-Black female or you have a very low opinion of what it means to be Black, or both.

The rules regarding race in our society are well established and that is what I'm speaking on. You don't get to make up your own definition of race you dumb bytch. Name one person in this society born from a black mother who is classified as white. The list of people born from a white mother classified as black is endless. You can start that list with the President. Yous a fukking idiot.

I'm betting on the last option. Funny enough, you hate the system of white supremacy so much, want to supposedly dismantle it, but advocate to Black men the opposite of what you perceive white men are doing to maintain it You say white men are smart enough to not 'wife' non-Black women, but here you are advocating Black men sleep with and 'wife' white women because doing what white men wouldn't be dumb enough to do, would somehow work against them and not for them if Black men did it....

You lie so much it's pathetic. The only thing I've advocated is for black men to get with black women. Here's what I've actually said contrary to your lying ass assertions

A black man with a white woman can't really be pro black either though. Once you understand that the name of the game is to keep black people as a whole oppressed then you can't choose a non black woman while claiming to be in the struggle against that fight.

I actually posted this before you leaped your ugly ass in the conversation.

Finally, the enlarged point entirely goes against what you said at the beginning, where you claimed Black men with white women could hurt white supremacy, and Black women with white men could never do the same. Now you are saying both can. The only really stupid excuse you are trying to give to disguise your blatant backtracking, is adding other non-white people to the mix (something you also weren't doing at the beginning of this debate). Terrible.

I've already proved that you're a liar and that I've mentioned the potential threat that all non white men pose. We are talking about black men especially though and my point remains the same. The dynamics regarding wm-bw vs bm-ww pairings is not the same. Bm-ww pairings are more of a threat to the system of white supremacy than wm-bw pairings are. You havent refuted my position or even made a valid argument for why you disagree whatsoever. Hell, you're so gotdamn stupid that you don't even understand the argument that I've layed out supporting that position. All you've done is posted a bunch of dumb shyt while using bytchmade tactics in an attempt to cloud the issue because that's all you can do.

It has become extremely obvious you don't know what the hell you're talking about and never have. Again, you were arguing from a place of ego and never from a place of accuracy (especially in relation to white supremacy and its workings).

The only thing that's obvious here is that if you were twice as smart as you are now you'd still only be half as smart as I am. Seriously, yous a dumb bytch.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

We celebrate dogs and swine humping our legs now? :notocacs: