All my PAWG, Latina & Asian loving brethren.. go to twitter and search "black guys" (no homo) :whoa:

[PartyHeart]

You haven't made one factual point that refutes what I've said here. Not one. Yous a silly dumb bytch. That's not ad hominem attack it's an obvious observation.

I haven't gone back in anything that I've said. In fact, your stupidity had caused me to repeat myself over at over and over proving that I haven't gone back on anything. You'll lie quicker than a cat can lick it's ass. You'll literally say anything.

Between you being a gotdamn idiot who doesn't read or comprehend too well and you being a pathetic liar, you hardly ever speak the truthThat post is from April 10th over a month ago you lying ass bytch. The fukk is wrong with you?

You're not repeating yourself, you're saying a new version of the original nonsense you were attempting to prove each time after I shredded holes in your logic. You can tell by how much you're still typing and desperately trying to convince yourself and anybody that might still be reading your pathetic rants that you know you've lost.

So the fukk what dumbass the Asian women who put white men on a pedastal chasing them are perpetuating white male supremacy as well.

So what? So it goes directly against your point you idiot

I've suggested no such thing you lying ass bytch. White supremacy exists anywhere white people are significant numbers. What I said to you is that Asian women in Asian countries don't chase white men.

So the fukk what? What is your point here?

I'm amazed how dumb you are

The point is that Asian women choosing white men in America hasn't had an effect on white supremacy whatsoever. It has neither reinforced or improved white supremacy in any way, because the key to white supremacy isn't who white men marry. On top of that it hasn't had any negative effect on the Asian community, their economics, or their familial structure. Your stupidity is redundant at this point. Its like debating with someone who is mentally handicapped.

The rules regarding race in our society are well established and that is what I'm speaking on. You don't get to make up your own definition of race you dumb bytch. Name one person in this society born from a black mother who is classified as white. The list of people born from a white mother classified as black is endless. You can start that list with the President. Yous a fukking idiot.

It happens all the time. Just because its unbeknownst to you doesn't mean its nonexistent you idiot. In fact, this will surely blow your mind, but there's even a name for it. Its called passing you waste of brain cells, and its been going on for centuries. To the point that there was a very famous film made about it over 60 years ago, and a whole new class/lifestyle formed on it in the south, particularly in Louisiana. Like I said, you try so hard to sound like you have any clue at all about racial dynamics in this country, but continuously show that not only do you lack the mental capacity to piece together simple deductions, but you also lack even the basic knowledge of racial dynamics to even begin to piece things together period.

You lie so much it's pathetic. The only thing I've advocated is for black men to get with black women. Here's what I've actually said contrary to your lying ass assertions
I actually posted this before you leaped your ugly ass in the conversation.

lmao @ how mad you are. I'd be furious too if I was getting my ass handed to me like you are. You still out here trying to pretend you were talking about non-Black men as a whole this entire time like we can't go back and read your retarded posts from jump and see you're lying.

I've already proved that you're a liar and that I've mentioned the potential threat that all non white men pose. We are talking about black men especially though and my point remains the same. The dynamics regarding wm-bw vs bm-ww pairings is not the same. Bm-ww pairings are more of a threat to the system of white supremacy than wm-bw pairings are. You havent refuted my position or even made a valid argument for why you disagree whatsoever. Hell, you're so gotdamn stupid that you don't even understand the argument that I've layed out supporting that position. All you've done is posted a bunch of dumb shyt while using bytchmade tactics in an attempt to cloud the issue because that's all you can do.

The only thing that's obvious here is that if you were twice as smart as you are now you'd still only be half as smart as I am. Seriously, yous a dumb bytch.

And the flip flopping continues

From saying IN JUST YOUR PREVIOUS POST that if all white men started choosing non-white women (which includes Black women you moron) it'd be a threat to white supremacy just like if all white women started choosing non-white men it'd be a threat to white supremacy, to now saying but with Black men its just "more of a threat" than with Black women. You are grasping at STRAWS to make your liking white women more 'okay' than the reverse honey. And just to remind you: its pathetic as fukk. Your insecurity is almost as laughable as your inability to muster up a rational thought.

I'll wait for the next rehashing of your point though. You're on version twenty at this point.

 

[Gravity]

You're not repeating yourself, you're saying a new version of the original nonsense you were attempting to prove each time after I shredded holes in your logic. You can tell by how much you're still typing and desperately trying to convince yourself and anybody that might still be reading your pathetic rants that you know you've lost.

No you TRIED to prove that I was somehow switching it up and saying something that I hadn't previously said only to be exposed as a liar. I'm saying the exact same things that I've said from the beginning. This is easy for me and I take pleasure in shytting on your stupidass anytime you open you slack jawed ass mouth to me.

So what? So it goes directly against your point you idiot

No it doesn't, that's why you didn't explain how.

I'm amazed how dumb you are

The point is that Asian women choosing white men in America hasn't had an effect on white supremacy whatsoever. It has neither reinforced or improved white supremacy in any way, because the key to white supremacy isn't who white men marry. On top of that it hasn't had any negative effect on the Asian community, their economics, or their familial structure. Your stupidity is redundant at this point. Its like debating with someone who is mentally handicapped.

Look at you trying to speak for Asians now Contrary to this nonsensical bullshyt that you've just pulled from your ass I've seen countless Asian men and some Asian women discuss their problems with The whole wm-aw thing. Asian women who put white men on a pedastal above their own certainly perpetuate white supremacy and other Asians definitely call them out on it. Obviously Asians opposed do feel that it has a negative impact on their community. That's actually based on what I've read some Asians say too. I've read Asian men who resent being devalued and seen as beneath white men by some of their women. I've also read Asian women talk about how they resent those who reinforce certain submissive stereotypes that white men have about Asian women. Asian women dating out with white men at such a high rate is definitely an issue in the Asian community. You'll come up here and say anything regardless of how untrue and illogical it is.

It happens all the time. Just because its unbeknownst to you doesn't mean its nonexistent you idiot. In fact, this will surely blow your mind, but there's even a name for it. Its called passing you waste of brain cells, and its been going on for centuries. To the point that there was a very famous film made about it over 60 years ago, and a whole new class/lifestyle formed on it in the south, particularly in Louisiana. Like I said, you try so hard to sound like you have any clue at all about racial dynamics in this country, but continuously show that not only do you lack the mental capacity to piece together simple deductions, but you also lack even the basic knowledge of racial dynamics to even begin to piece things together period.

"Passing" doesn't count dumbass. The term "passing" is defined as a black person fooling people and living as a white person. I asked you to name one person who Was born from a black mother who is CLASSIFIED as white. A black person who "passes" as white Is believed to have 2 white parents. If its known that a person has a black patent then that person can't pass as white.

lmao @ how mad you are. I'd be furious too if I was getting my ass handed to me like you are. You still out here trying to pretend you were talking about non-Black men as a whole this entire time like we can't go back and read your retarded posts from jump and see you're lying.

The game won't get anywhere. You're so pathetically delusional that even when you're dead ass in the middle of a lie you'll just continue to lie as if you're fooling the person who has you caught. I'm starting to think that your emotionally unstable at this point. Yea you dumb bytch, anyone can go back and see who's lying. That's why I re-posted what I said over a month ago

And the flip flopping continues

From saying IN JUST YOUR PREVIOUS POST that if all white men started choosing non-white women (which includes Black women you moron) it'd be a threat to white supremacy just like if all white women started choosing non-white men it'd be a threat to white supremacy, to now saying but with Black men its just "more of a threat" than with Black women. You are grasping at STRAWS to make your liking white women more 'okay' than the reverse honey. And just to remind you: its pathetic as fukk. Your insecurity is almost as laughable as your inability to muster up a rational thought.

I'll wait for the next rehashing of your point though. You're on version twenty at this point.

Obvioisly you can't walk and chew gum at the same time. You can't process two thoughts simultaneously. While its true that white supremacy would be threatened if white men started choosing black and other non white women in significant numbers, the likelihood of that happening is basically non existent. You want proof? Look at reality. Due to their unjust system of supremacy/oppression white men have always had access to black women as well as other non white women. If white men were going to wife non white women up in significant numbers then they would've done so because there's never been anything preventing them from doing so. There's never been any backlash against white men for getting with non white women. Slave masters weren't disowned from their families for getting with their slaves. On the other hand white women haven't had that "freedom". They've never been able to go outside of their race without facing severe backlash. The double standard that you're trying to deny is solidified by white men. The same white men that would lynch any black man who dared look at a white woman the wrong way had no problem raping black women and keeping them as bed wenches. That tells you right there which pairing they saw as the most threatening. this is basic common sense. In man-woman relationships men are usually the leaders meaning that a woman will usually follow the ideology of the man that she's chosen to be with. You're going against logic and common sense so it's no shock that you're getting your ass kicked. Post some more dumb shyt so I can verbally smack the fukk out of you again.

 

[Serious]

@ where this thread went.

definitely got to add this to my summer reading list,...Simply don't have the time to read right now...

 

[PartyHeart]

No you TRIED to prove that I was somehow switching it up and saying something that I hadn't previously said only to be exposed as a liar. I'm saying the exact same things that I've said from the beginning. This is easy for me and I take pleasure in shytting on your stupidass anytime you open you slack jawed ass mouth to me.


No it doesn't, that's why you didn't explain how.

Smh @ being so in your emotions you can't even quote properly anymore. I'm not about to dig through that terrible formatting to address each of your moronic, backtracking points one by one again. At the end of the day, your post is once again switching and attempting to move the goal posts once your faulty logic gets caught and exposed.

1. You say you were always talking about non-Black men dating white women as a whole, yet your very first post, before I even made the mistake of quoting your retarded ass says:

This why the double standard that some black women complain about regarding black/white interracial dating is valid. A black woman being with a white man is not the same as a black man being with a white woman. A black woman with a white man is automatically a wench.

Not a one mention of non-Black men as a whole.

2. You say you were saying from the beginning if ALL non-white men get chosen by white women that that is a threat to white supremacy. You claim you never said just Black men with white women is a threat to white supremacy but here is you in your second retarded post:

White women with black men is a direct threat to the myth of white male supremacy. Black women makin themselves available for white men isn't a threat to a white supremacy, it's a benefit to it. I'm just acknowledging what white men have always acknowledged.

It was only after I exposed to you how IDIOTIC this thought process is from a numbers standpoint that you introduced other non-white male minorities into this so-called threat to white supremacy. That was MUCH later in the debate.

3. You say that from the beginning you never made a distinction between the amount of 'threat' to white supremacy that would result from all non-white men being chosen by white women, and all non-white women being chosen by white men. But anyone can see from your previous 2 retarded posts, that's a lie. You specifically lauded and tried to uphold the double standard you are attempting to create for men being with white women, specifically Black men because truthfully you were never talking about any other race of men until I obliterated your logic, as opposed to women being with white men. But here are several of your retarded posts at the beginning of the debate showing, THAT WAS A LIE:

One of white mens' biggest fears is white women being with black men and this has been clearly illustrated throughout history. A lot of laws were put on the books based on the strength of this very fear. Cocaine was made illegal based on the fear that it was causing black men to go around smashing white women. Prostitution was made illegal based on the fear that black men pimping/trafficking white women. The examples that illustrate the incurable fear that white men have of black men being with white women is endless. There's been no effort to keep black women from white men though.

I suspect that if that jury had been composed of white women with black men or other non white men the verdict would've been different. Again, a white woman who with a black man(unless the black man is bonafide wannabe white man Clearance Thomas type c00n)is a direct challenge to white male supremacy

You had a marked history of saying Black women with white men is no threat to white supremacy, but then were forced to admit this once your shytty logic backed you into a corner you couldn't get out of:

My position is that if white women started getting with non white men in significant numbers it would threaten the system of white supremacy. Would the system be threatened if the scenario was reversed and white men started getting with non white women in significant numbers? Absolutely.

That is after saying for pages and pages on end:

White women with black men is a direct threat to the myth of white male supremacy. Black women makin themselves available for white men isn't a threat to a white supremacy, it's a benefit to it.

Which confirms what I said FROM THE BEGINNING. If you are dumb enough to believe you can sleep and marry your way out of white supremacy as a Black man (or non-white man as you later changed your argument to), you must exercise extremely faulty and extremely retarded logic in order to say with a straight face that you CANNOT sleep and marry your way out of white supremacy as a Black woman (or a non-white woman, as again you strategically changed your argument to once I shredded you).

 

[DEAD7]

 

[PartyHeart]

Some more highlights from your pathetic, low self esteem rants, just for fun:

Of course black children can be born from non black wombs. What planet are you from?

Take on and defend to the death the ideologies of your oppressor who HATES you and sees you as inferior and claim to be pro-Black, brehs.

non white women can't produce white children.

Extend exclusivity and pedastalize white women while openly denying it for non-white women, brehs.

When a white woman has children with a non white man the children aren't considered white. Lol the idea of children with non white men as fathers being white themselves. White women who go outside the white race are usually disowned from the white community and their children are never accpeted.

So I guess even if we go with the one drop rule you are fighting so adamantly for, the reverse somehow isn't true right? The children from a white father and a Black mother are considered white and a further confirmation of white male supremacy, right?

Be so desperate to try to make a distinction that doesn't exist you blatantly contradict yourself within the same post, with one sentence damn near following its contradiction, brehs.

 

[Serious]

So I guess even if we go with the one drop rule you are fighting so adamantly for, the reverse somehow isn't true right? The children from a white father and a Black mother are considered white and a further confirmation of white male supremacy, right?

Be so desperate to try to make a distinction that doesn't exist you blatantly contradict yourself within the same post, with one sentence damn near following its contradiction, brehs.

Come on now, you what he means by "America's" classification of race

 

[Gravity]

Smh @ being so in your emotions you can't even quote properly anymore.

I haven't the desire or energy to proof read these posts editing them and all that. Damn near every one of your pathetically stupidass posts has been edited some edited 3 hours later. That's just how hard you're trying here. That's how "mad" you are. You don't see my posts being edited because I'm not trying as hard. I'm shytting on you in one take.....easy. I gives a fukk if the formatting isn't perfect.

1. You say you were always talking about non-Black men dating white women as a whole, yet your very first post, before I even made the mistake of quoting your retarded ass says:

Not a one mention of non-Black men as a whole.

I've already established that you're a compulsive lying ass bytch.

you're now trying to claim you've been talking about non-white men as a whole when no other men but Black were EVER mentioned in any of your other posts until I destroyed the stupidity of you reasoning.

On the flip side though, white women choosing non white men(black men especially) does threaten the myth that white men are superior. What's so difficult to understand?

^^^That's you being caught in a bold face lie you sniveling c*nt.

2. You say you were saying from the beginning if ALL non-white men get chosen by white women that that is a threat to white supremacy. You claim you never said just Black men with white women is a threat to white supremacy but here is you in your second retarded post:

It was only after I exposed to you how IDIOTIC this thought process is from a numbers standpoint that you introduced other non-white male minorities into this so-called threat to white supremacy. That was MUCH later in the debate.

There's no contradiction you dumb bytch. You only think so because you still dot comprehend what I've been saying from the very beginning. You're not even dealing with my point in effort to dumb this down into an argument over semantics. "well in this post you only said black men but in this post you say black men and non white men". You lied ho and you're still lying. You were completely unaware of the fact that I was talking about non white men in general and black men specifically the entire time. It wasn't "later on in the debate". The post that I re-posted to prove that you were lying is from over a month ago. Gotdamn you're stupid.

3. You say that from the beginning you never made a distinction between the amount of 'threat' to white supremacy that would result from all non-white men being chosen by white women, and all non-white women being chosen by white men. But anyone can see from your previous 2 retarded posts, that's a lie. You specifically lauded and tried to uphold the double standard you are attempting to create for men being with white women, specifically Black men because truthfully you were never talking about any other race of men until I obliterated your logic, as opposed to women being with white men. But here are several of your retarded posts at the beginning of

Look from now own just quote my posts in my own words and respond to that. I'm not even going to waste my time responding to this "you say..." bullshyt because it's clear that you aren't smart enough to paraphrase. You lack the basic comprehension skills and overall intelligence to put what I'm saying in your own words. This only leads to you arguing against yourself like you're doing here. You don't have to paraphrase me, my words are there to be quoted verbatim.

You had a marked history of saying Black women with white men is no threat to white supremacy, but then were forced to admit this once your shytty logic backed you into a corner you couldn't get out of

That is after saying for pages and pages on end:

That's not an "admission" because I've never denied it. Here's why wm-bw pairings aren't a threat to white supremacy. 1) White have shown that they will never wife black women in significant numbers. Despite have umimpeded access to black women for centuries, black women are the last choice of the white man when he looks to marry outside of his race. Sure white men will keep as bed wenches and "dirty little secret" type fetishes but they'll never wife black women in significant numbers. There's no threat of that because if it was going to happen it would've happened already. 2) When white men do wife black women, they choose black women who are willing to perpetuate the status quo. They pick black women who believe in or are willing to deal with white supremacy. White men certainly aren't going to wife women who are truly trying to fight against their system of supremacy that grants them privileges. Black women with white men are trying to get down with those white privileges themselves.

Which confirms what I said FROM THE BEGINNING. If you are dumb enough to believe you can sleep and marry your way out of white supremacy as a Black man (or non-white man as you later changed your argument to), you must exercise extremely faulty and extremely retarded logic in order to say with a straight face that you CANNOT sleep and marry your way out of white supremacy as a Black woman (or a non-white woman, as again you strategically changed your argument to once I shredded you).

Pointing out a potential threat to white supremacy is not the same ad declaring it as a strategy that should be used. There's no reason for you to even make that leap when I've come out and directly told you that I'm opposed to it. I could literally quote me saying "I'm against blacks going outside of the race......you can't be pro-black with a non black mate" numerous times in several different posts. You insist upon ignoring what I'm saying to argue against your own disingenuous interpretation of what I said. You need some self esteem and a gotdamn tutor.

 

[PartyHeart]

Come on now, you what he means by "America's" classification of race

No I know what he means by the social classification of race, I was actually the one who brought it up. However, he is trying to convolute that to say that to be Black biologically = one drop rule. And that 2 Black parents = 1 Black parent (particularly if the father is Black ) and the result is a Black child. That is not the case. In addition, he contradicts himself by trying to draw that distinction but then essentially denying that under that same rule the child would also be classified as Black if the mother was Black and the father white too.

 

[Gravity]

Some more highlights from your pathetic, low self esteem rants, just for fun:


Take on and defend to the death the ideologies of your oppressor who HATES you and sees you as inferior and claim to be pro-Black, brehs.

The concept of race Isis this society was established long before me and it will be here long after I'm gone. It does us as black people no good to ignore the concept of race in favor of believing whatever we want to believe. The delusional "I've got my own personal definition of race" mentality that you seem to have is why you see black people with Wesley Snipe's complexion claiming everything but black. Either you believe in our society's concept of race or you don't.

Extend exclusivity and pedastalize white women while openly denying it for non-white women, brehs.

You're the one pedalizing whites by being offended at me pointing out that you can't as a black woman can't give birth to a white person. Personally I don't see anything impressive about the ability to give birth to a white person. White women being the only women who can give birth to whites isn't a compliment to me it's a dis. You see it as being "exclusive" and I see it as being genetically inferior. The white man's seed/genes just isn't as strong as the black man's. Thats's basically what racism as we know it boils down to. White people are genetically inferior do whites are racist because they think it's the only way that they can survive.

So I guess even if we go with the one drop rule you are fighting so adamantly for, the reverse somehow isn't true right? The children from a white father and a Black mother are considered white and a further confirmation of white male supremacy, right?

Be so desperate to try to make a distinction that doesn't exist you blatantly contradict yourself within the same post, with one sentence damn near following its contradiction, brehs.

I can't even follow you here. It looks like you're trying to be sarcastic but I can't really tell lol.

No I know what he means by the social classification of race, I was actually the one who brought it up. However, he is trying to convolute that to say that to be Black biologically = one drop rule. And that 2 Black parents = 1 Black parent (particularly if the father is Black ) and the result is a Black child. That is not the case. In addition, he contradicts himself by trying to draw that distinction but then essentially denying that under that same rule the child would also be classified as Black if the mother was Black and the father white too.

You're such a liar. I've denied no such thing. Of course children the product of wm-bw pairings are considered black. You were the one arguing the opposite saying that black women could give birth to white kids. You really are a piece of shyt.

 

[PartyHeart]

^^^That's you being caught in a bold face lie you sniveling c*nt.

There's no contradiction you dumb bytch. You only think so because you still dot comprehend what I've been saying from the very beginning. You're not even dealing with my point in effort to dumb this down into an argument over semantics. "well in this post you only said black men but in this post you say black men and non white men". You lied ho and you're still lying. You were completely unaware of the fact that I was talking about non white men in general and black men specifically the entire time. It wasn't "later on in the debate". The post that I re-posted to prove that you were lying is from over a month ago. Gotdamn you're stupid.

I think you really are mentally retarded. I said in the very same post that you started out saying Black men then moved into all non-white men. It was obvious that you were always talking purely about Black people however, from your only mentioning Black men in your first couple of posts, to your highlighting of "especially Black men" in even the post you quoted, to your lack of mentioning all non-Black women until I destroyed your argument using numbers many posts later.

Look from now own just quote my posts in my own words and respond to that. I'm not even going to waste my time responding to this "you say..." bullshyt

Of course you aren't. You went from making a horrible point, then rephrasing it a million times after you got your logic exposed, to now not wanting to address your stupidity head on at all.

That's not an "admission" because I've never denied it. Here's why wm-bw pairings aren't a threat to white supremacy. 1) White have shown that they will never wife black women in significant numbers. Despite have umimpeded access to black women for centuries, black women are the last choice of the white man when he looks to marry outside of his race. Sure white men will keep as bed wenches and "dirty little secret" type fetishes but they'll never wife black women in significant numbers. There's no threat of that because if it was going to happen it would've happened already.

Nope. Black women do not want white men in large numbers the way Black men like yourself want white women. We deny them and this has been proven time and time again through studies. You want it very badly to be that they are rejecting Black women because you are, as I said form the beginning extremely anti-Black female and seek to put an anti-Black female slant on our IR numbers, but all stats show that Black women have no interest in dating IR. This is changing because disgusting, self hating closeted homosexual Black men who go around slandering Black women and trying to subdue us in every way possible like yourself though. You, and your Tommy Sotomayors and the like are (and quite effectively might I add) making many Black women feel they have no allies whatsoever even in their race so now they are just now beginning to open up to others. But trust and believe for decades this was not the case, and stats prove this.

2) When white men do wife black women, they choose black women who are willing to perpetuate the status quo. They pick black women who believe in or are willing to deal with white supremacy. White men certainly aren't going to wife women who are truly trying to fight against their system of supremacy that grants them privileges. Black women with white men are trying to get down with those white privileges themselves.

Is this the part where you make up lies to prove your point with no evidence whatsoever? Oh ok. Go ahead and prove that this is the type of Black women white men wife, you self hating liar. I have presented evidence for everything I've said, including when it comes to posting your lies and contradictions, and I have plenty more. Let's see you do the same for once in this debate besides hurling sentences full of insults that nobody but you are emotionally affected by.

Pointing out a potential threat to white supremacy is not the same ad declaring it as a strategy that should be used. There's no reason for you to even make that leap when I've come out and directly told you that I'm opposed to it. I could literally quote me saying "I'm against blacks going outside of the race......you can't be pro-black with a non black mate" numerous times in several different posts. You insist upon ignoring what I'm saying to argue against your own disingenuous interpretation of what I said.

This is you skirting around your own words again, as well as you displaying you complete lack of deductive reasoning skills. If something is supposedly a threat to white supremacy and white supremacy is what you seek to abolish, why would you hesitate to call it a strategy?? There's something extremely telling in that. Even more, if you are absolutely dense enough to admit that even white men aren't stupid enough to think that marrying Black women in numbers is going to actually help them take on more power or subdue the Black race further, why the fukk are you stupid enough to believe Black men, who compared to white men have no power, can follow the same model and actually make gains???

I know why, its because you are a fukking moron. I don't even say that as any insult anymore, but as a simple fact. It all comes back down to the fact that your suggestion that somehow Black women choosing white is wrong but Black men choosing white is not only not wrong but actually a positive. You keep forgetting that white women....ARE WHITE. And that by Black men choosing WHITE over BLACK they too would be confirming white supremacy. You are desperately trying to make it so that it only works one way when it doesn't. That is your ego and your idiocy speaking.

And the irony of it all is that all of your posts have been a confirmation of everything Black feminism stands for though you hate it so. Because you continuously view Blackness through a lens of MALENESS. Black MALES choosing white females would be confirming white supremacy over Black women in the same way that Black FEMALES choosing white men would be confirming white supremacy over Black males. But the former doesn't effect you in your maleness, so you refuse to acknowledge its harmfulness, and even attribute benefits to it. But in your refusal to acknowledge it you give more support to the very thing you seek to dismantle, white supremacy, and give even more credence to the very necessity of the thing you hate, Black feminism. You fukking idiot.

 

[PartyHeart]

The concept of race Isis this society was established long before me and it will be here long after I'm gone. It does us as black people no good to ignore the concept of race in favor of believing whatever we want to believe. The delusional "I've got my own personal definition of race" mentality that you seem to have is why you see black people with Wesley Snipe's complexion claiming everything but black. Either you believe in our society's concept of race or you don't.

So do you also believe in the concept of racism then? Because the 'exclusivity of whiteness' is a big proponent to that. That they think their blood is 'tainted' if they mess with a Black but say yes you can claim them as your own. It is a key to white supremacy.

You're the one pedalizing whites by being offended at me pointing out that you can't as a black woman can't give birth to a white person. Personally I don't see anything impressive about the ability to give birth to a white person. White women being the only women who can give birth to whites isn't a compliment to me it's a dis.

So then what is the ability to give birth to a Black person? Especially if everybody from white to Black to Mexican to Asian can do it which you said is the case? I guess at some point you wouldn't even need a Black person to create a Black child anymore. Just 2 people, each with one white parent, would suffice.

You see it as being "exclusive" and I see it as being genetically inferior. The white man's seed/genes just isn't as strong as the black man's. Thats's basically what racism as we know it boils down to. White people are genetically inferior do whites are racist because they think it's the only way that they can survive.

Black + white = grey and grey =/= Black. You might say it goes more with Black than it does with white, but it is not the same.

A biracial person often has very distinct features from a Black person as well. You are fooling yourself if you pretend this is not the case. They are equal parts Black and equal parts white, I mean this is simple fact. Literally the only reason they are considered Black by society is because white supremacy has made it so that mixing with any Black blood is tainting and the result is a cast out to be placed with Blacks. There's a reason why you can make the declaration that anything mixed with Black is Black but you wouldn't automatically declare one particular race or the other for an Asian/White mixed person.

I can't even follow you here. It looks like you're trying to be sarcastic but I can't really tell lol.You're such a liar. I've denied no such thing. Of course children the product of wm-bw pairings are considered black. You were the one arguing the opposite saying that black women could give birth to white kids. You really are a piece of shyt.

I never said that you moron, quote me where I did? I simply schooled you on the fact that there are plenty of people with a Black parent who pass as white when you tried to claim that it was impossible. It has been happening throughout history and still happens today.

 

[Akata Man Bromo]

*slowly backs out of this thread*

 

[TheArchitect]

Hmmm...maybe it's time I made a twitter...

 

[Gravity]

At this idiot