I gotta co-sign. Im a big fan of both shows but I dont see how being more realistic is a reason for a show bein better. These are 2 completely different types of shows and both are great in their own ways. Its kind of like arguing MJ/Magic, Kobe/Lebron, Barry/Emmit, etc. All greats, but tough to compare bc of how different they are. Same with these 2 shows
When people criticize a show for being unrealistic its usually because of obvious plot holes...If you have holes that are quickly or lazily filled up to put a full story together, (or worse are never filled) then that can legitimately be a criticism...I don't think this is more of an issue with Breaking Bad than it is with most shows.. But it is something that can be pointed out..
The reason The Wire (up until season 5) and Sopranos didnt have many plotholes is because they were more "art imitating life" type shows..Many of the story lines were adaptations of real life people and scenarios that Davids Simon met while being a reporter...Omar, Stringer and Avon were real life people in Baltimore....The Sopranos are based off of the DeCavalcante crime family from New Jersey..Most of the stories happened to real Gambino and Luchese soldiers...When you do an adaptation of "ripped from the headlines" type stories its easier to have a consistent character.. Because the blueprint is there..And its based off of reality and history...I'm not sure if a nerdy school teacher, who's brother-n-law/best friend is in the DEA has ever become one of the biggest drug traffickers in America, within a 12 month period all while dying of cancer..What is the blueprint for that type of character? It's an ambitious undertaking and I give Vince props because he gets it "right" 90% of the time..
And its not an easy task..But still I think he lets his imagination run wild or he'll bring in a character (like Todd) with no in depth back story to explain why they are doing the things they do...I think the biggest reason for this is the condensed timeline, which has always been my biggest beef with the show..I don't have a problem that a lot of these scenarios happen on BB...It just seems like a stretch that they would all happen to the small inner circle of people all within such a short span of time...
With The Wire and Sopranos the story lines and ensemble casts were so broad that witnessing all these "wild and unpredictable" things happening seemed more reasonable because they werent just only happening to Tony and Carmela and they all didnt occur within an 18 month period..The Wire or Sopranos would have showed us what Saul Goodman does when he goes home on the weekend...Im not even sure if he has a wife or kids...For Huell Babineaux to be such a vital piece to the final season's plot we knew nothing about him or his back story...When he snitches its not like... "we knew that would happen" or " no not Huell how could he?!?" It's more like "Oh well I guess"