Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,811
Daps
203,969
Reppin
the ether
It wasn't grammar it was you saying "no" twice, I'm typing on my mobile while I'm on the run. If I'm typing something completely in error, I dont mind someone correcting me a bit. I already was told incorrectly I used scapegoat wrong but your two "no"s stood out

Also somehow you really missed what I was juxtaposing. Not sure now if your two " no"s were just an innocent error or you lack reading comprehension .
You're talking about reading comprehension in the same message where you put all your energy into accusing me of saying something I didn't say? :snoop:



But I'm talking about AOC and Trump's over reliance on Twitter to spread their version of fake news. Hate that I have to spell it out, but if you've read any of my prior posts it would have given you that context
I think that makes it even worse, I'm still of the mindset that it's tactless and bad form to consistently put business on Twitter which we know what that platform has become. She hasn't started yet, so some of the things she's saying, she hasn't even had the opportunity to have a proper communication with people before blasting them. She's just playing up the public ,which I guess selfishly, her team has probably given her the idea that she got next and shes making sure she stays in the limelight. It's reeks of the narcissism underlying Trump. Funny how she has too respond to every negative tweet or article . Some no name writer calls her a bytch, she responds. I believe she's called out the right media already as well. There's a lot of parallel to Trump but you guys are ignoring it because you like her politics.
Literally the only parallels with Trump you listed are that she uses Twitter to communicate with the public and she responds to her critics. :why:

You just randomly called her tweets, "fake news", which is a better parallel to what Trump does than anything AOC has done. :pachaha:



this amounts to nothing. Instead of going up to discuss this first with Manchin, she went straight to the media putting her "demands" in the media. Hasn't even taken a seat yet , but is all in the media posturing. So of course when Manchin agrees that he also wants renewable energy, it will play into "AOC forced Manchin"
Breh, Manchin is the most conservative and coal-friendly Democrat representing the most conservative and coal-friendly state. He's 71-years-old with more than half of his life in politics, and you're gonna posture like his position on fossil fuels isn't already set in stone and ain't gonna move from anything other than massive public/party pressure? :childplease:

This is Manchin on energy, and you got it like he's gonna come out in favor of phasing out coal soon just because AOC has a private chat. :mjlol:
Manchin's first bill in the Senate dealt with what he calls the EPA's overreach. After the EPA vetoed a previously-approved permit for the Spruce Mine in Logan County, West Virginia, Senator Manchin offered the "EPA Fair Play Act."[74] The bill would "clarify and confirm the authority of the Environment Protection Agency to deny or restrict the use of defined areas as disposal sites for the discharge of dredged or filled material."[75] Manchin said the bill would prevent the agency from "changing its rules on businesses after permits have already been granted."[76]

On October 6, 2010, Manchin directed a lawsuit aimed at overturning new federal rules concerning mountaintop removal mining. Filed by the state Department of Environmental Protection, the lawsuit "accuses U.S. EPA of overstepping its authority and asks the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to throw out the federal agency's new guidelines for issuing Clean Water Act permits for coal mines." In order to qualify for the permits, mining companies need to prove their projects would not cause the concentration of pollutants in the local water to rise 5 times past the normal level. The New York Times reported that EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said the new legislation would protect 95 percent of aquatic life by banning operators from dumping mine waste into streams.[77]

Manchin has received criticism from environmentalists due to his close family ties to the coal industry. He served as president of Energysystems in the late 1990s before becoming active in politics. On his financial disclosures in 2009 and 2010, his reported earnings from the company were $1,363,916 and $417,255 respectively.[78] Critics have stated his opposition to health regulations that would raise expenses for the industry are due to his stake in the industry; Jim Sconyers, chairman of West Virginia's Sierra Club chapter stated that "he's been nothing but a mouthpiece for the coal industry his whole public life."[78]However, opinions on the subject are mixed; The Charleston Gazette noted "the prospect that Manchin's $1.7 million-plus in recent Enersystems earnings might tilt him even more strongly pro-coal might seem remote, given the deep economic and cultural connections that the industry maintains in West Virginia."[79]

On November 14, 2011, Manchin chaired his first field hearing of that committee in Charleston, West Virginia, to focus on Marcellus Shale natural gas development and production. Manchin said, "We are literally sitting on top of tremendous potential with the Marcellus shale. We need to work together to chart a path forward in a safe and responsible way that lets us produce energy right here in America."[80]

Manchin supports building the Keystone XL Pipeline from Canada. Manchin has said, "It makes so much common sense that you want to buy [oil] off your friends and not your enemies." The pipeline would span over 2,000 miles across the United States.[81]

On November 9, 2011, Manchin introduced the "Fair Compliance Act" with Senator Dan Coats (R-IN). Their bill would "lengthen timelines and establish benchmarks for utilities to comply with two major Environmental Protection Agency air pollution rules. The legislation would extend the compliance deadline for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, or CSAPR, by three years and the deadline for the Utility MACT rule by two years—setting both to January 1, 2017."[82]

Manchin introduced the "American Alternative Fuels Act" on May 10, 2011, with Senator John Barrasso (R-WY). The bill would remove restrictions on the development of alternative fuels, repeal part of the 2007 energy bill restricting the federal government from buying alternative fuels and encourage the development of algae-based fuels and synthetic natural gas. Regarding the bill, Manchin said, "Our unacceptably high gas prices are hurting not only West Virginians, but all Americans, and they underscore a critical need: the federal government needs to be a partner, not an obstacle, for businesses that can transform our domestic energy resources into gas."[83]

In 2011, Manchin was the only Democratic senator to support the proposed Energy Tax Prevention Act, which sought to prohibit the United States Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas.[84] He was also one of four Democratic senators to vote against the Stream Protection Rule.[85] In 2012 Manchin supported a GOP effort to "scuttle Environmental Protection Agency regulations that mandate cuts in mercury pollution and other toxic emissions from coal-fired power plants", while West Virginia's other senator, Jay Rockefeller, did not.[86]

Manchin criticized Obama's environmental regulations as a "war on coal" and demanded what he described as a proper balance between the needs of the environment and the coal business.[87] The Los Angeles Times has noted that while professing environmental concerns, he has consistently stood up for coal, saying "no one is going to stop using fossil [fuels] for a long time." He "does not deny the existence of man-made climate change," wrote the Los Angeles Times, but "is reluctant to curtail it."[88] In February 2017, he was one of only two Democratic senators to vote to confirm Scott Pruitt as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.[89] In June 2017, Manchin supported President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate accord, saying he supported "a cleaner energy future" but that the Paris deal failed to strike "a balance between our environment and the economy."[90]

You literally couldn't find a worse Democrat on energy and pollution issues than Manchin. :dead:
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,835
Daps
12,054
Literally the only parallels with Trump you listed are that she uses Twitter to communicate with the public and she responds to her critics. :why:
No Duh? I specifically said this is what I was paralleling and how it's funny she does it and she's a hero, when Trump does it we tell him to get off Twitter. That is the hypocritical behavior I'm pointing out.



As far as Manchin, instead of playing politics on twitter, she should first discuss with the man instead of attacking him on Twitter. But since she's not in office yet, she's behaving like stupid internet troll who doesn't understand politics aka @Rhakim


I'm not gonna argue about something you said that I literally quoted. You're just trying to weasel out of it because I proved you wrong.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,811
Daps
203,969
Reppin
the ether
I'm not gonna argue about something you said that I literally quoted. You're just trying to weasel out of it because I proved you wrong.
You literally quoted someone else, that wasn't me. This isn't the first or even the second time you've done that, you REPEATEDLY have had an issue with not realizing who you are even communicating with and then doubling down on your errors even after they correct you. That's why your condescension looks so unbecoming.



No Duh? I specifically said this is what I was paralleling and how it's funny she does it and she's a hero, when Trump does it we tell him to get off Twitter. That is the hypocritical behavior I'm pointing out.
If someone had said, "No politicians should be using Twitter ever, even if they're not in office yet", then praised AOC for her twitter use, they would be hypocrites.

If someone chides Trump for childish insults, false claims, belligerent behavior and trying to conduct executive orders via Twitter without the assistance of his advisers, then praises AOC for effectively rebuking her critics with on-target receipt-based retorts and then pivoting back to clear espousal of her main policy proposals, that's not hypocritical, that's discernment.



As far as Manchin, instead of playing politics on twitter, she should first discuss with the man instead of attacking him on Twitter. But since she's not in office yet, she's behaving like stupid internet troll who doesn't understand politics aka @Rhakim
You're already shown blatant ignorance of Manchin's positions and how he got to them, and you're lecturing her on understanding politics?

Manchin represents the most coal-friendly positions of the most coal-friendly state as he comes from a coal-connected family and has been paid literally millions of dollars by the fossil fuel lobby. He's 71 years old and has spent DECADES :cape: for the coal industry. It is his DEFINING position in politics. I've already given you the receipts.

The idea that Manchin would change his core beliefs and positions solely because he had a sit-down chat with a rookie member who wasn't even in the same chamber as him is silliness.

There is absolutely zero chance that Manchin substantially changes any of his positions on energy issues, it would take away his entire rationale for being a senator. AOC's only shot to have any influence is to bring enough pressure from the public onto party leadership that they refuse to seat him in that slot. And she's doing it via the most effective public communication tool she has.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,835
Daps
12,054
You literally quoted someone else, that wasn't me. This isn't the first or even the second time you've done that, you REPEATEDLY have had an issue with not realizing who you are even communicating with and then doubling down on your errors even after they correct you. That's why your condescension looks so unbecoming.




If someone had said, "No politicians should be using Twitter ever, even if they're not in office yet", then praised AOC for her twitter use, they would be hypocrites.

If someone chides Trump for childish insults, false claims, belligerent behavior and trying to conduct executive orders via Twitter without the assistance of his advisers, then praises AOC for effectively rebuking her critics with on-target receipt-based retorts and then pivoting back to clear espousal of her main policy proposals, that's not hypocritical, that's discernment.

You can qualify her twitter Usage as much as you want, she's using it to attack her detractors and every person who mention her name is being attacked. No different that Trump, you're being bias because you're a supporter. She literally just attacked a fellow Democrats policy and imbued her own. It's no different than trump, she's not communicating she's attacking and pumping her slanted leftist fake news. She's already been fact checked about some of the bullshyt. Again she's hasn't even taken office yet!!!

Wasn't she just attacking Lobbyists ?! How does she think the laws are made? Lobbyists play an important part in politics bringing issues that some of these politicians would never know about to the forefront . She doesn't understand what she's doing and is very Trump with her short, presumptuous , half truthful tweets
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,835
Daps
12,054
You're not using that word correctly.

You literally quoted someone else, that wasn't me. This isn't the first or even the second time you've done that, you REPEATEDLY have had an issue with not realizing who you are even communicating with and then doubling down on your errors even after they correct you. That's why your condescension looks so unbecoming.

Oh I misquoted you huh...:stopitslime:



How about you're a habitual liar
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,811
Daps
203,969
Reppin
the ether
Oh I misquoted you huh...:stopitslime:



How about you're a habitual liar

What's my name?

Is it @Jhoon?

It's bad enough that you repeatedly attribute something to one person that someone else said. It's worse that you keep doubling down when corrected.

At this point I've got to believe that you're just a troll pretending to be ignorant, because no one is really that ignorant. You're on ignore now. :camby:



You can qualify her twitter Usage as much as you want, she's using it to attack her detractors and every person who mention her name is being attacked. No different that Trump, you're being bias because you're a supporter. She literally just attacked a fellow Democrats policy and imbued her own. It's no different than trump, she's not communicating she's attacking and pumping her slanted leftist fake news. She's already been fact checked about some of the bullshyt. Again she's hasn't even taken office yet!!!

Wasn't she just attacking Lobbyists ?! How does she think the laws are made? Lobbyists play an important part in politics bringing issues that some of these politicians would never know about to the forefront . She doesn't understand what she's doing and is very Trump with her short, presumptuous , half truthful tweets
Don't use words that you can't use correctly.

And we caping for lobbyists now. :dead:

Literally ONE reason for lobbyists to exist. So those with financial resources and group connections can promote their interests over those without. :heh:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,811
Daps
203,969
Reppin
the ether
@Rhakim

I don’t know why you are engaging with that goof-ball.
I always give the new fools a few weeks to change their ways. I had never seen him post on HL until just a couple weeks ago, he came out of nowhere. Is he an alias for someone else?

Anyway, he's on ignore now.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,774
Reputation
3,753
Daps
160,033
Reppin
Brooklyn



The New York Times

2 hrs ·
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is to become the youngest congresswoman in U.S. history, said that her ancestry includes Sephardic Jews who fled Europe. “Some of those people landed in Puerto Rico,” she explained. “As is the story of Puerto Rico, we are a people that are an amalgamation. We are no one thing. We are black; we are indigenous; we are Spanish; we are European.”


About this website

NYTIMES.COM

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Jewish, Too?
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, who is to become the youngest congresswoman in American history, said that her ancestry includes Sephardic Jews who fled Europe.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,835
Daps
12,054
What's my name?

Is it @Jhoon?

It's bad enough that you repeatedly attribute something to one person that someone else said. It's worse that you keep doubling down when corrected.

At this point I've got to believe that you're just a troll pretending to be ignorant, because no one is really that ignorant. You're on ignore now. :camby:




Don't use words that you can't use correctly.

And we caping for lobbyists now. :dead:

Literally ONE reason for lobbyists to exist. So those with financial resources and group connections can promote their interests over those without. :heh:


This is the second time you're saying Im using a word incorrectly and you have no idea wtf you're talking about. I caught you lying in the other post. It's pointless to argue word Usage because you're a dumb ass and when called out your lack the integrity to own up it. Don't even know who @Jhoon is, some nobody poster?

And you claim on ignore but you'll respond to me soon again because you know you're wrong and you'll be hell bent to respond to me to try to get a win because you look like a fool right now.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,835
Daps
12,054



The New York Times

2 hrs ·
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is to become the youngest congresswoman in U.S. history, said that her ancestry includes Sephardic Jews who fled Europe. “Some of those people landed in Puerto Rico,” she explained. “As is the story of Puerto Rico, we are a people that are an amalgamation. We are no one thing. We are black; we are indigenous; we are Spanish; we are European.”


About this website

NYTIMES.COM

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Jewish, Too?
Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, who is to become the youngest congresswoman in American history, said that her ancestry includes Sephardic Jews who fled Europe.


Makes sense she's a jew, not everyone in Puerto Rico have African in them. She trying to pocahontas her way into people's hearts lol ...you can look at her and tell she has probably has no direct African ancestry in her

Pretty sure she was tapped in heavy in order to get in this position .
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,852
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,785
Reppin
305
:snoop: Gat damn. This dude is either a hater or has a huge crush on AOC. On a daily basis he’s on here fighting brehs on what she says on twitter and her political stances. She got him as mad as she has these gop politicians and journalists:wow:

It’s ok breh. We all think she’s cute too.:takedat:
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,675
Reputation
6,347
Daps
169,246
Makes sense she's a jew, not everyone in Puerto Rico have African in them. She trying to pocahontas her way into people's hearts lol ...you can look at her and tell she has probably has no direct African ancestry in her

Pretty sure she was tapped in heavy in order to get in this position .
She isn't Jewish you dumb ass. :heh:

How can brehs live their lives in complete ignorance? :why:
 
Top