Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590


Lol. The shucking and jiving in here is off the charts.


AOC issued the biggest direct attack on black congressmen nationwide from a fellow democrat since the 80’s.

If “insert name” democrat ever did that ppl would be in uproar, black congressmen actually are but of course their comments are downplayed.

She issued the biggest attack in 4 decades Against incumbent CBC members, by a fellow dem. That’s a quantifiable fact.


She’ll probably get up to 80% of the ppl she challengers being black before y’all stop saying “it’s just a coincidence”:francis:
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
So you want to claim that Engel "controls" what you call "one of the top 5-10 biggest infrastructure projects in history", but there are zero receipts even MENTIONING his name in association with the project anywhere. You're running completely on "a friend told me."

You're so fukking full of shyt and you're not even trying to hide it. :laff:

well who’s running it on the house side then?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
well who’s running it on the house side then?

Rep. Nadler is the House's biggest booster for the project, that was mentioned repeatedly already in this thread including in articles you posted. His name is all over in connection to the project, while Engel is nowhere to be found.

Rep. Nadler Statement on Gateway Tunnel Project Funding in FY19 Appropriations Bill

Congressman's dream tunnel forges ahead



Unlike Engel, Nadler actually DOES sit on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, along with 8 members of the CBC.

Let me note again - Nadler and 8 members of the CBC are on the relevant House committee that would push through funding for this project (Nadler and several CBC members are even on the appropriate subcommittee). But Engel isn't. He has zero relevant pull in the House.

Just admit you made this shyt up and take your L.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
I told y’all about trumps speech about nationwide police reform, a week before the wsj had an article.
My God you're full of shyt. :picard:

On June 11th Trump announced he was going to have a rally in Tulsa. That same day Trump PUBLICLY announced he was finalizing an executive order addressing police misconduct nationwide.

Trump proposal avoids committing to major police reform as protesters call out brutality and racism



A good two days after that was PUBLICLY announced, you "broke the story" here and claimed your "boy who works in politics" told you that his police misconduct rules would be announced during the Juneteenth speech that was already scheduled.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/wor...dards-during-his-speech-on-juneteenth.786308/



Instead of announcing the misconduct regulations in the Tulsa speech like you said he would, Trump signed it as an executive order on June 17th. You inexplicably said "told you so" even though it wasn't being announced on the Juneteenth speech like you claimed and the fact that he was planning an executive order had already been public days before you said anything.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/wor...ech-on-juneteenth.786308/page-2#post-38038225



So the news you "broke" was shyt that had already been public for two days and the new info you added turned out to be 100% wrong.

But you're still trying to use that as an example of how you're secretly keyed in to backroom politics. :mjlol:

Like I said, you're completely full of shyt. :russ:
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
My God you're full of shyt. :picard:

On June 11th Trump announced he was going to have a rally in Tulsa. That same day Trump PUBLICLY announced he was finalizing an executive order addressing police misconduct nationwide.

Trump proposal avoids committing to major police reform as protesters call out brutality and racism



A good two days after that was PUBLICLY announced, you "broke the story" here and claimed your "boy who works in politics" told you that his police misconduct rules would be announced during the Juneteenth speech that was already scheduled.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/wor...dards-during-his-speech-on-juneteenth.786308/



Instead of announcing the misconduct regulations in the Tulsa speech like you said he would, Trump signed it as an executive order on June 17th. You inexplicably said "told you so" even though it wasn't being announced on the Juneteenth speech like you claimed and the fact that he was planning an executive order had already been public days before you said anything.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/wor...ech-on-juneteenth.786308/page-2#post-38038225



So the news you "broke" was shyt that had already been public for two days and the new info you added turned out to be 100% wrong.

But you're still trying to use that as an example of how you're secretly keyed in to backroom politics. :mjlol:

Like I said, you're completely full of shyt. :russ:

none of ur links have anything to do with him saying the speech at Tulsa. Which he just said he didn’t do bc a couple black supporters of his asked him not to.

he admitted he was going to at Tulsa, my friend told me. I posted it to thecoli, and then he changed his mind. And publicly stated he was going to divulge the order in tulsa WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Talks Juneteenth, John Bolton, Economy in WSJ Interview


U took one resource saying he was going to issue an order, married that to another resource saying he was going to go to tulsa. Neither of which say he’s going to have a speech about that specific issue in Tulsa and somehow someway convinced yourself. That I’m the one full of shyt.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
none of ur links have anything to do with him saying the speech at Tulsa. Which he just said he didn’t do bc a couple black supporters of his asked him not to.

he admitted he was going to at Tulsa, my friend told me. I posted it to thecoli, and then he changed his mind. And publicly stated he was going to divulge the order in tulsa WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Talks Juneteenth, John Bolton, Economy in WSJ Interview

U took one resource saying he was going to issue an order, married that to another resource saying he was going to go to tulsa. Neither of which say he’s going to have a speech about that specific issue in Tulsa and somehow someway convinced yourself. That I’m the one full of shyt.
How could he "divulge the order" in Tulsa when he had ALREADY divulged the order in Dallas two days before you posted shyt? :dahell:

Breh, YOU were the one who said that him signing the fukking executive order was the shyt you predicted. YOU came up with that, not me:



You took credit for "predicting" an executive order that had already been announced days earlier, then when I call you out on it you claim you were just talking about the speech when you had already tried right there to take credit for predicting the order. Julzing ass liar. :heh:

That was the executive order that he already announced on June 11th, two days before you had said shyt. He couldn't announce an executive order in Tulsa if he had already announced it in Dallas more than a week earlier. And he can't sign an executive order at a political rally. So you're just showing us that you're completely full of shyt.


So what's your big scoop? That Trump was planning to talk about the biggest topic in America during his speech? THAT is a scoop to you? :laff:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
Let's recap:

1. @Warren Moon is trying to take credit for predicting that Trump would do something in Tulsa that he never did, when

2. He already had tried to take the credit for his "prediction" by claiming it referred to the executive order, not Tulsa, even though that executive order had already been announced days before his prediction.

3. He's doing all this to try to force us to believe that he has inside information that Congressman Engel is secretly masterminding a multi-billion project that he never talks about, is virtually never mentioned in connection to, and isn't even on the right committee to fund.

4. Which is only relevant because he claims to have other secret information that the contract will be given to Black workers, even though the project hasn't even been funded yet and there are zero such receipts for said deal anywhere.

5. And he's created this massive conspiracy theory solely to juelze for why it's secretly bad that AOC is supporting a liberal Black man over a White centrist. :facepalm:
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
How could he "divulge the order" in Tulsa when he had ALREADY divulged the order in Dallas two days before you posted shyt? :dahell:

Breh, YOU were the one who said that him signing the fukking executive order was the shyt you predicted. YOU came up with that, not me:



You took credit for "predicting" an executive order that had already been announced days earlier, then when I call you out on it you claim you were just talking about the speech when you had already tried right there to take credit for predicting the order. Julzing ass liar. :heh:

That was the executive order that he already announced on June 11th, two days before you had said shyt. He couldn't announce an executive order in Tulsa if he had already announced it in Dallas more than a week earlier. And he can't sign an executive order at a political rally. So you're just showing us that you're completely full of shyt.


So what's your big scoop? That Trump was planning to talk about the biggest topic in America during his speech? THAT is a scoop to you? :laff:


Trump talking about police reform in Tulsa black Wall Street on Juneteenth was a big deal. That’s why they stopped him.


that was the entire reason of the post bc he was a dumb ass and going to do that. :mindblown:

Idk why you’re trying to inception this shyt to prove something in your own head.

trump said he was issuing an exec order.

word was he was going to do it in Tulsa on Juneteenth. This was not anywhere online, I posted thecoli post.

trump issues the exec order before Juneteenth.

I posted it on the 14th

and trump admitted he was going to do it on the 19th.

wtf do u not understand about that? :dwillhuh:

the title of the thread is literally:


Word of mouth: Donald Trump may be issuing national police standards during his speech on Juneteenth

Which he was going to do and admitted he was going to
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
Trump talking about police reform in Tulsa black Wall Street on Juneteenth was a big deal. That’s why they stopped him.


that was the entire reason of the post bc he was a dumb ass and going to do that. :mindblown:

Idk why you’re trying to inception this shyt to prove something in your own head.

trump said he was issuing an exec order.

word was he was going to do it in Tulsa on Juneteenth. This was not anywhere online, I posted thecoli post.

trump issues the exec order before Juneteenth.

I posted it on the 14th

and trump admitted he was going to do it on the 19th.

wtf do u not understand about that? :dwillhuh:

the title of the thread is literally:


Word of mouth: Donald Trump may be issuing national police standards during his speech on Juneteenth

Which he was going to do and admitted he was going to


Then why in that exact thread did you try to take credit for it when he signed the executive order on June 16th, you lying ass motherfukker?




And you can't issue an executive order during a speech, dumbass. :mjlol:
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
Then why in that exact thread did you try to take credit for it when he signed the executive order on June 16th, you lying ass motherfukker?




And you can't issue an executive order during a speech, dumbass. :mjlol:

Bro u keep saying executive order. That’s not wtf I said I literally posted the the title of the thread and bolded it just for you.


Word of mouth: Donald Trump may be issuing national police standards during his speech on Juneteenth

Those standards were him literally saying he’s going to create a national database on Juneteenth in Tulsa.


Idk wtf u going through but you’re losing it. No bullshyt
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
Bro u keep saying executive order. That’s not wtf I said I literally posted the the title of the thread and bolded it just for you.

Word of mouth: Donald Trump may be issuing national police standards during his speech on Juneteenth

Those standards were him literally saying he’s going to create a national database on Juneteenth in Tulsa.


Idk wtf u going through but you’re losing it. No bullshyt



I've quoted this four times, I don't know if you have a mental disorder or what.



That is you yourself taking credit for the executive order. Right there. Right in the thread we're talking about. YOU took credit for predicting the executive order.

Of course you were lying then, and you're lying now. You didn't predict jack shyt. But a week ago you tried to claim that your prediction came true when Trump issued the executive order, and now that I put up receipts catching you in that lie, you're trying to change your prediction to something that DIDN'T come true and hide the fact that you were already caught lying about that a week ago.

Explain that post. Right there. The one where you claim your prediction came true when you posted the executive order.
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,590
Breh, I've quoted this four times, I don't know if you have a mental disorder or what.



I'm quoting you yourself taking credit for the executive order. Right there. Right in the thread we're talking about. YOU took credit for predicting the executive order.

Of course you were lying then, and you're lying now. You didn't predict jack shyt. But a week ago you tried to claim that your prediction came true when Trump issued the executive order, and now that I put up receipts catching you in that lie, you're trying to change your prediction to something that DIDN'T come true and hide the fact that you were already caught lying about that a week ago.

Explain that post. Right there. The one where you claim your prediction came true when you posted the executive order.


I Quoted a tweet that had the words “executive order” in it and added two words.... told you so :dwillhuh:


If I quoted a different tweet, just saying he issued police standards, the context would be the same :dwillhuh:. Trump was going to talk about his police standards at the Tulsa site. But later backed out.


More choosing that tweet instead of another had zero reason to do with the words “executive order” in the tweet. It was just the first tweet on my timeline when I searched. :dwillhuh:


I didn’t know you’d have a 2 am rant/tirade about the word usage in the tweet I chose. :unimpressed::hubie:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,924
Reppin
the ether
I Quoted a tweet that had the words “executive order” in it and added two words.... told you so :dwillhuh:


If I quoted a different tweet, just saying he issued police standards, the context would be the same :dwillhuh:. Trump was going to talk about his police standards at the Tulsa site. But later backed out.


More choosing that tweet instead of another had zero reason to do with the words “executive order” in the tweet. It was just the first tweet on my timeline when I searched. :dwillhuh:


I didn’t know you’d have a 2 am rant/tirade about the word usage in the tweet I chose. :unimpressed::hubie:

:mindblown: are you even trying to say here? That's not a response at all. :dahell:

When you said, "Told you so", you were clearly claiming that that tweet with Trump issuing an executive order on police misconduct was proving your prediction right. Even though he had already publicly said in Dallas that he was going to do that shyt two days before you made your prediction.

I'm starting to actually feel bad. If it's 2am where you are maybe you should get some sleep and apologize in the morning for making an ass of yourself.
 
Top