It's crazy. He goes on these wild rants and counterattacks instead of answering the simplest questions.
@Warren Moon, your FIRST post in this thread was "I hate this chick" when she hadn't even become a representative yet or "targeted" anyone. Your claims that she's on some campaign to target Black politicians were already debunked pages ago. Stop pretending like this isn't personal for you.
It's crazy. He goes on these wild rants and counterattacks instead of answering the simplest questions.
* He still can't tell us a single item in the tweet he cited that supports his "prediction", even though he wrote "told you so" under it.
* He still can't quote a single statement from the WSJ article that supports his "prediction", even though he keeps linking it.
* He still can't explain how he could claim that Engel was controlling a tunnel project when his name isn't connected to it anywhere, or why he didn't know that Nadler was famously the one pushing it in Congress.
* He claimed that no one in media covers the tunnel because it's "too boring", and ignored when I posted a dozen links showing that it's talked about all the time.
* He still can't explain why supposedly there's a network of Black staffers who have the inside scoop on both the Trump campaign and Engel's office, and why they spill the beans to some random internet poster, but nothing they talk about ever reaches the media....I guess no White people on Trump or Engel's staff know any of these things and no black media cares, in Warren Moon's world?
I think you need some sleep breh.
Ur just trying to come at me. 
You claimed that Engel "controlled" the tunnel process, and directly asked me to tell you who was leading it in Congress if not Engel. I had to tell you that Nadler was leading it in Congress (something that EVERYONE who knows anything about the tunnel already knows) and gave you mad receipts.
Where do you get 6 from? I've actually posted over a dozen links in this thread showing Nadler's leadership on the Congress side of the tunnel issue, and I could have posted hundreds. You don't like that I posted from a wide time frame? How 'bout these?
But today you're the only one who is making up all sorts of bullshyt with zero receipts and refusing to back down when you get proven wrong.And I’m not the only poster or person in that community saying shyt that happens in the background on here
Da fukk does that have anything to do with anything?
shyt is sad to watch
She endorsed Bernie and campaigned for him. And the only House members challenging Pelosi for her seat were further right than Pelosi.idc what y'all say. AOC is a shill.
She says alot of sweet shyt, but when it was time to put it on the line she sucked Nancy Pelosis dikk and abandoned Bernie.
AOC is an astute politician and not a bull in a china shop zealot. The Progressive movement needs more pragmatism and I’m glad AOC is the leader of itidc what y'all say. AOC is a shill.
She says alot of sweet shyt, but when it was time to put it on the line she sucked Nancy Pelosis dikk and abandoned Bernie.
AOC has substance and is one of the most genuine people on The Hill. None of these politicians are saviors. But the more of them who aren’t corporatists will make policy have more meat for poor and working class people.
