well black politicians only make up 10% of congressmen. yet they made up 40% of the people she targeted.
Why did she target black ppl at a 4x rate?
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez - "Not All Dems Are The Same"
- Thread starter AnonymityX1000
- Start date
well black politicians only make up 10% of congressmen. yet they made up 40% of the people she targeted.
Why did she target black ppl at a 4x rate?
@Warren Moon is doing some impressive dodging when it comes to the CBC not endorsing Bowman. It is really a classic performance on how to avoid addressing a subject. I’m truly impressed 
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
You tell me man, I have said repeatedly she isn't targeting them, there is no logic that supports why she would target them and she also supports Black politicians currently running that aren't yet in Congress.
You are clinging to some weird statistic to make it seem like she has ulterior motives. If that's all you got I don't think it is worth discussing any longer. Come with any other evidence then we can continue to discuss. I'll let you have the last word.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
@Warren Moon is doing some impressive dodging when it comes to the CBC not endorsing Bowman. It is really a classic performance on how to avoid addressing a subject. I’m truly impressed
@Warren Moon is doing some impressive dodging when it comes to the CBC not endorsing Bowman. It is really a classic performance on how to avoid addressing a subject. I’m truly impressed
Ppl got deals they need to get done.
but you and @jayshiggs listen to the wsj or the daily podcast today.
Charles booker is a primary challenger. That was initially solely funded by African American money and ppl who are CBC financial pillars.
aoc will never be the leader of black progressivism.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Still didn't address the CBC backing Engel over Bowman.
Still didn't address the CBC backing Engel over Bowman.
first sentence in my response.
ppl got deals to get done
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
The CBC got deals to get done that they couldn't with a future member? Please flesh out your point more, currently it's not making any sense. lol
Yeah the CBC has deals to get done a new challenger wouldn’t be able to get done bc he doesn’t have the connections.
Why are you so silent about a black funded progressive movement?
you should be loving that right?
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Deals don't sound like legislation. Self-interest before the common good.Yeah the CBC has deals to get done a new challenger wouldn’t be able to get done bc he doesn’t have the connections.
Why are you so silent about a black funded progressive movement?
you should be loving that right?
Oh what do you want me to say? Hip Hip Hooray! More power to ya keep doing what you are doing. How's that?
Deals don't sound like legislation. Self-interest before the common good.
Oh what do you want me to say? Hip Hip Hooray! More power to ya keep doing what you are doing. How's that?
95% of jobs post “new deal” are not directly instituted by legislation.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
OK, I don't know what we are talking about again. lol
If you want jobs in your district and need to make deals to do so.
Most jobs don’t come directly from legislation
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
OK and Engel is underpinning all this for CBC members?! I think they can let one house member fall in order to support a new Black member of Congress. They are the CBC, what's the point if other things besides Black representation/solidarity is more of a priority?
Who is making that argument? I’m not an AOC stan. She is far from perfect, and I have several good faith criticisms of her. However, I find it odd that you are so invested in her downfall when you support politicians with worse records on Black issues. Also Jamaal Bowman is an individual that could become one of the leaders in Black progressivism. But, instead of endorsing him the CBC Choose to endorse a White Jewish individual, that couldn’t care less about Black issues. There are good individual members of the CBC, but as a whole it been a joke.