storyteller
Veteran
I didn’t post the munchkin analogy, I figured you’d pick on it. Clearly you didn’t.
So basically you’re saying if a congressman endorses primary opponents against their fellow dem incumbents; its utterly meaningless, as long as said congressman endorsed other democrats for vacant (traditionally) democratic seats or in races against republicans?
Yes, and I've even bolded the key word here. PRIMARY. She's still endorsing Democrats, sometimes black Democrats even....party loyalty isn't the problem here and neither is racial make up.
I'm gonna roll with Occam's Razor which is that she's picking out ideologically similar options, I bet support for Medicare 4 All and or the Green New Deal followed by their chances to win the primary were bigger factors than whatever nonsense you imagine she's using to pick targets. It's not really coherent, so I'm not certain.
The democratic incumbents she does and doesn’t endorse in the primary race isn’t a relevant issue at all? As long as she has a certain number of endorsements overall.
You seem to be losing the thread here. I'm saying that AOC is endorsing Progressive Democratic candidates to win seats in Congress. She's targeted seats held by Republicans, Democrats and Open Seats alike. She's targeted white people's seats, black people's seats and latino's too...so whatever race based or loyalty based argument you're trying to make requires you to straight up ignore or not count a meaningful number of her endorsements. That is literally cherry picking.