There's nothing in that discussing the meaning of "unwilling" to work that was the ubiquitous walk back she did of them documents after claiming it was a republican doctored document despite it being on her website.
We all know she removed this language in the final bill submitted but it was in a version and so it's safe to say its in her head
this isnt discussing the meaning?
Intense criticism
ensued, and some of Ocasio-Cortez's staffers and advisers attempted to walk back the "unwilling to work" line.
First, one of her surrogates said the document was "doctored" and circulated by Republicans, then her chief of staff said the line was from a draft that was never intended for publication.
In a
tweet on Saturday evening, Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, explained that the line was written with specific recipients in mind, such as retirees.
"We were essentially thinking about pensions and retirement security," he said. "E.g. economic security for a coal miner who has given 40 years of their life to building the energy infra of this country, but who may be not be willing to switch this late in his career."
Had us fooled at first.
